Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The 8000 was manufactured 6 years prior to the TG-4 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the 8000 scores versus the TG-4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus TG-4
8000 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus 8000
TG-4 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 70 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Olympus TG-4
8000 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 enjoys physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the 8000 vs the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c24d/5c24d961665b6a42ea3ddce6c5b8efb0c24ca99d" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and TG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53b91/53b91431bd5fd3b31b0336c432f4fc2000abb7d0" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and TG-4.
Clearly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to offer greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85395/85395ff3a0bcc1bb9125c85d7817151847648f60" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eefea/eefead3484892c3914113156988a7be6be21876b" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $380 | $379 |