Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VH-515
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012

Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 vs Olympus VH-515: A Comprehensive Compact Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing the right compact camera can be a surprisingly complex task, especially when you’re seeking one that delivers not just portability but also respectable image quality and reliable performance across diverse photography situations. Today, we’re diving deep into two Olympus compact cameras from the same brand lineage but differing significantly in design philosophy and feature set: the Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 (aka mju Tough 8000) announced in 2009, and the later Olympus VH-515 from 2012.
This comparison isn’t just about numbers - we explore their core strengths and limitations based on real-world performance, technical specifications, and use case suitability. Whether you’re a beginner looking to get started with adventure photography, or a seasoned enthusiast prioritizing image quality and versatility on the go, this review lays out everything you need to decide.
At a Glance: Physical Design and Handling
First off, let’s look at the body size, ergonomics, and user interface - key factors that directly impact your shooting experience.
Feature | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VH-515 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 95 x 62 x 22 | 102 x 60 x 21 |
Weight (grams) | 182 | 152 |
Screen Size (inches) | 2.7 | 3.0 |
Screen Resolution (px) | 230 | 460 |
Touchscreen | No | Yes |
Environmental Sealing | Yes | No |
Viewfinder | None | None |
Lens Mount | Fixed | Fixed |
The Olympus 8000 impresses with its rugged build featuring environmental sealing that guards against dust and moisture - a definite boon for outdoor or adventure photographers who need durability without hauling bulky gear. Despite its compact size, the 8000 feels solid in hand thanks to its slightly chunkier profile.
On the other hand, the VH-515 is lighter and slightly wider but lacks any official weather sealing. Its more modern 3-inch touchscreen provides a much clearer interface for navigating menus and framing shots, which can be very appealing for casual shooting and quick adjustments.
If you’re planning on shooting in harsh environments, the Tough 8000’s build quality offers peace of mind that no plastic shell can match. Meanwhile, the VH-515’s sleeker design caters more to typical urban and travel photography where portability and touchscreen convenience take priority.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality Breakdown
A crucial determinant of image quality is sensor type, size, and resolution. Both cameras share a 1/2.3-inch sensor size - common in compacts - but Olympus took different sensor technologies for each model.
Specification | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VH-515 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Dimensions (mm) | 6.08 x 4.56 | 6.17 x 4.55 |
Sensor Area (mm²) | 27.72 | 28.07 |
Resolution (MP) | 12 | 12 |
Antialias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Max Native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
ISO Range | 64-1600 | 100-1600 |
RAW Support | No | No |
Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 4:3, 3:2 | 4:3, 16:9 |
The BSI-CMOS sensor in the VH-515 represents a notable advancement over the older CCD in the 8000. Backside illumination means better light gathering efficiency, improved low-light behavior, and cleaner images at higher ISOs. The VH-515’s improved pixel layout and updated image processor (TruePic III+) further contribute to sharper photos with more dynamic range.
The 8000’s CCD sensor holds up decently at base ISO, delivering pleasant color rendition and contrast, but you’ll notice noise creeping in aggressively beyond ISO 400, limiting its use in dim environments or fast-action shots.
For landscape photographers prioritizing fine detail and clean skies, the VH-515 is the technically superior option; however, its lack of RAW limits post-processing flexibility. Both cameras output only JPEGs, making in-camera settings critical for optimal results.
Lens Versatility and Optical Performance
Lens focal range and aperture play a decisive role in the camera’s creative and practical capabilities.
Feature | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VH-515 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length (35mm eq) | 28-102 mm (3.6x zoom) | 26-130 mm (5x zoom) |
Max Aperture | f/3.5 - f/5.1 | f/2.8 - f/6.5 |
Macro Focus Range | 2 cm | 5 cm |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (Yes) | Sensor-shift (Yes) |
The VH-515 has a wider zoom range (5x) and slightly wider wide-angle coverage (26mm) compared to the 8000’s 3.6x zoom and 28mm wide end, which provides more framing flexibility, especially for street and travel photographers. The 8000, however, shines in macro focusing, capable of crisp shots down to 2 cm from the sensor - a boon if you love close-up photography of plants or small objects.
The max aperture of f/2.8 at the wide end on the VH-515 is also notably faster than the 8000’s f/3.5. This allows for better subject isolation and more light gathering for indoor or low-light scenarios, though the narrower aperture at telephoto (f/6.5) can be a hindrance at longer zooms.
Both utilize sensor-shift image stabilization, key for handheld shooting and video capture, but expect best results at moderate zoom levels.
If you prioritize macro and adventure-focused close-up work, the Tough 8000 deserves your attention; if you prefer zoom versatility for diverse subjects like landscapes and street scenes, the VH-515 takes the win.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance
Moving to autofocus (AF) and shooting dynamics - areas that critically affect usability across action, wildlife, and portraiture.
Feature | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VH-515 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast-detect | Contrast-detect with face detect |
AF Modes | Single AF only | Single AF, tracking AF |
Number of AF Points | Not specified (basic) | Multiple AF areas |
Continuous Shooting | None | 2 fps |
Live View Focus | Yes | No |
The 8000’s autofocus is rudimentary - it relies on simple contrast detection without face or subject tracking, so acquiring sharp focus in dynamic conditions is challenging. There’s no continuous AF or burst mode, which limits candid or fast street photography.
The VH-515 improves autofocus capability with face detection and autofocus tracking, increasing reliability for portraits and moving subjects. However, its modest continuous shooting speed of 2 frames per second is modest by 2010s standards and limits utility for sports and wildlife shoots requiring rapid frame capture.
Both cameras lack manual focus control, constraining advanced users but simplifying use overall.
For your wildlife or sports needs, neither camera excels dramatically - but the VH-515’s autofocus improvements and tracking are meaningful for casual action shooters.
Screen and User Interface Experience
The rear screen is an invaluable tool for framing, reviewing, and changing settings, and here we see significant generational differences.
Feature | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VH-515 |
---|---|---|
Screen Size | 2.7” | 3.0” |
Resolution | 230K pixels | 460K pixels |
Touchscreen | No | Yes |
Live View | Yes | Yes |
The VH-515’s larger, higher resolution touchscreen enhances usability, especially for users accustomed to smartphones and tablets. Touch AF and menu navigation simplify the experience, making this an approachable compact for newer photographers.
The 8000’s screen is smaller, lower-res, and fixed-type without touch, contributing to a more traditional point-and-shoot feel. While less intuitive, it keeps battery consumption lower.
Neither camera has electronic viewfinders; you’re restricted to using the LCD for composition, which may pose challenges in bright sunlight.
The touchscreen interface and clearer display of the VH-515 are a big plus for on-the-fly creativity and easier control.
Video Capabilities and Multimedia
While still-camera performance often dominates discussions, video functions increasingly matter for hybrid content creators.
Feature | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VH-515 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 640 x 480 (VGA) @ 30fps | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) @ 30fps |
Video Format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone Input | No | No |
Headphone Jack | No | No |
In-Body Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Sensor-shift |
The VH-515 emerges clearly as the more capable video camera, capturing Full HD 1080p at 30 fps with modern efficient codecs (H.264). Although lacking external mic inputs, the image stabilization helps handheld shots look smoother.
The 8000 is stuck with VGA resolution and outdated Motion JPEG, which delivers grainy, low-detail footage by today’s standards.
If you value video functionality and want to capture high-quality clips alongside your photography, the VH-515 is your obvious choice.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
Battery longevity and storage impact your ability to sustain shoots and manage files effectively.
Feature | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VH-515 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | Not specified | LI-50B |
Storage Types | xD Picture Card, microSD, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi connected |
The 8000’s use of xD Picture Card and microSD is unusual and increasingly obsolete, making it harder to find affordable, high-capacity cards today.
The VH-515 uses the ubiquitous SD card standard, including higher capacity and faster SDHC/SDXC cards, easing workflow and storage management.
Interestingly, the VH-515 supports Eye-Fi wireless cards for some wireless transfer capabilities, which the 8000 entirely lacks.
Battery specifics are scant, but given the VH-515’s lighter weight and efficient sensor, expect slightly longer run times.
Real-World Photography Practice: Sample Images and Use Cases
To see how these specifications translate into actual pictures, here are sample shots from both cameras covering various photography scenarios.
Portrait and Bokeh Performance
- The VH-515’s wider aperture at 26mm (f/2.8) produces slightly better subject isolation and smoother background blur, albeit limited by the compact sensor size.
- The 8000’s narrower apertures and older autofocus struggle with sharpness and focusing on eyes, especially under low light.
- Face detection on the VH-515 improves capturing well-focused portraits with accurate skin tones.
Landscape and Dynamic Range
- VH-515 yields higher resolution and dynamic range, rendering more detail in shadows and highlights.
- 8000 images show more washed out skies and lower overall tonality gradation.
- Both struggle in extreme dynamic range scenarios compared to larger sensor cameras but suffice for casual landscape work.
Wildlife and Sports
- Both cameras’ autofocus systems and frame rates are limiting factors for action photography.
- VH-515’s face and AF tracking make it somewhat easier to capture moving subjects, but neither camera is designed for professional sports use.
Street and Travel Photography
- The 8000’s ruggedness benefits adventurous travelers venturing outdoors.
- VH-515’s compact, sleek profile and touchscreen garner favor in urban environments.
- Image quality and zoom flexibility of the VH-515 give it an edge in street scenarios.
Macro Photography
- 8000’s macro focus down to 2 cm enables tight shots of subjects, outperforming VH-515's 5 cm minimum.
- Stabilization in both aids handheld macro shooting.
Night and Astro Photography
- Both cameras have noisy output at their top ISOs (1600), limiting star photography.
- VH-515’s BSI sensor produces somewhat cleaner high ISO images but is still no match for larger sensor compacts.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Reliability
One area where the Stylus Tough 8000 stands out is with environmental sealing - dustproof and splashproof features are built into the design offering toughness Olympus built its reputation on.
The VH-515 lacks weather resistance, arguably restricting it to mild weather shooting unless extra care is taken.
For professional reliability in challenging conditions, the 8000’s ruggedness makes it the go-to choice.
Tailoring Your Choice: Who Should Pick Which?
Let’s digest everything we’ve covered into actionable buying recommendations.
User Profile | Recommended Camera | Why? |
---|---|---|
Outdoor/Adventure Photographers | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ruggedness, macro focus, durability |
Casual Travel and Street Photographers | Olympus VH-515 | Superior sensor, zoom range, touchscreen |
Video Enthusiasts | Olympus VH-515 | Full HD video, image stabilization |
Macro Hobbyists | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Closer minimum focus distance |
Budget-Conscious Buyers | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Usually found at lower prices |
Photography Beginners | Olympus VH-515 | Easier interface, better AF system |
Sports/Wildlife Hobbyists | Neither; consider specialized models | Autofocus and burst rates too limited |
Scoring the Cameras Across Key Metrics
To summarize our findings objectively, here’s an overall performance scorecard, based on image quality, autofocus, build, features, and value.
The VH-515 ranks higher due to its superior sensor, better zoom, and video capabilities. The Tough 8000 scores well for ruggedness and macro, but trails in imaging technology.
How They Compare in Popular Photography Genres
Finally, here’s how each camera performs in specific photography disciplines:
- Portraits, landscapes, and travel photography favor the VH-515.
- Macro and rugged adventure photography align with the 8000.
- Neither suits demanding wildlife or sports photography.
- For video and everyday snapshots, VH-515 is preferred.
Final Thoughts: Getting the Most Out of Your Compact Olympus
Choosing between the Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and the Olympus VH-515 boils down to your priorities: rugged durability plus macro capability vs. advanced sensor tech and expanded zoom/video functions.
Here are some closing tips to help you get started:
- Try them in person: Handling the cameras helps evaluate ergonomics and interface comfort. The VH-515 touchscreen may appeal to many, but some value the Tough 8000’s physical buttons and sturdiness.
- Pair with right accessories: Invest in quality memory cards matching each camera’s requirements (xD/microSD for 8000, SD for VH-515). Consider protective cases for the VH-515 since it’s not weather sealed.
- Practice within limitations: Neither supports RAW or extensive manual controls, so mastering exposure compensation, composition, and light management is essential.
- Leverage stabilization: Both cameras’ sensor-shift stabilization is a plus; experiment with slower shutter speeds and handheld shooting.
- Understand video needs: Rely on VH-515 for casual Full HD videos; use 8000 only for simple clips.
Ready to capture memories with a compact that fits your style and photography goals?
Both cameras offer unique strengths worth exploring - check out hands-on tests or secondhand options to find your perfect match and elevate your creative journey.
Happy shooting!
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VH-515 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lb) | 152 gr (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $380 | $648 |