Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62d54/62d540e477b2fc4e185bed99aff836ee8cf05e0d" alt="Samsung HZ25W front Samsung HZ25W front"
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as WB5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus 8000 and Samsung HZ25W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The 8000 was launched 12 months prior to the HZ25W which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the 8000 scores against the HZ25W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Samsung HZ25W
8000 | HZ25W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus 8000
HZ25W | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 12 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Samsung HZ25W
8000 | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 enjoys outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8000 and Samsung HZ25W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the 8000 versus the HZ25W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b36a/2b36ade4c386e586ef25a4e5346ecd01a9121d43" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and HZ25W is 94 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6b28/c6b286e6e83a501730897a489b78d721596d4588" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and HZ25W.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos though you should really factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69180/69180cfa8ff999dc3895f3676865eeb67e69a551" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/facab/facab56d42a3a4013722164d477e6f2a7036a643" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Samsung HZ25W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Samsung HZ25W |
Alternative name | mju Tough 8000 | WB5000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lbs) | 428 grams (0.94 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $380 | $350 |