Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 vs Olympus Stylus XZ-10: A Practical Comparison for Every Photographer

When it comes to compact cameras from Olympus, the Stylus Tough 8010 (hereafter “8010”) and the Stylus XZ-10 (“XZ-10”) are intriguing options with very different priorities. The 8010, announced in 2010, is a rugged waterproof point-and-shoot built for adventure. Meanwhile, the XZ-10, introduced in 2013, targets enthusiasts who want manual controls and better image quality in a small, stylish body. Over my 15+ years testing cameras, these two have caught my eye for their distinct philosophies. In this comprehensive comparison, I’ll break down where each shines – from sensor and lens tech to real-world shooting across multiple photography disciplines.

By the end, you’ll know which fits your photographic style best and whether the trade-offs align with your budget and needs. Let’s dive right into it.

Getting a Feel: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling

A camera’s physical interaction can hugely affect your shooting experience. The Tough 8010 emphasizes durability and rugged functionality while the XZ-10 offers slightly more traditional handling cues.

Physically, the 8010 is compact and thin at 98x64x24mm, weighing in at 245g with its Lithium-ion battery. It feels solid in hand but is very much built for outdoor conditions – waterproof, shockproof, and freezeproof. Its textured grip and button placement intuitively support quick use while wearing gloves or in messy environments. No touchscreen or articulating display here, just rugged reliability.

The XZ-10 is a tad taller and thicker (102x61x34mm), but lighter at 221g with battery, offering a chunkier grip that feels more traditional to photographers used to manual adjustments. It sports a 3-inch 920k-dot fixed touchscreen, which greatly improves menu navigation and focusing, especially when you want to control exposure manually - and you’ll want to, because this camera fully supports manual focus and exposure modes.

Looking at the top plates, the XZ-10 features dedicated control dials for aperture and shutter priority modes, aperture control ring around the lens - a dream come true for enthusiasts. The 8010, conversely, has a simplified layout with no manual exposure control, showing its point-and-shoot roots.

If you prioritize rugged outdoor usability and weatherproofing, the 8010 wins here without question. However, for those craving nuanced control and better interface, the XZ-10’s ergonomics better suit traditional photography workflows.

Sensor and Image Quality: Decoding the Heart of the Camera

Sensor performance often defines image quality, especially in compact cameras where sensor size limitations are pronounced. Both cameras use 1/2.3 inch sensors but with distinct sensor technologies and resolutions.

• Olympus 8010: 13MP CCD sensor (6.08x4.56mm sensor area ~27.72mm²), max ISO 1600, no RAW support.
• Olympus XZ-10: 12MP BSI-CMOS sensor (slightly larger active area 6.17x4.55mm ~28.07mm²), max ISO 6400, supports RAW.

The 8010’s CCD sensor, by 2010 standards, was decent for outdoor snapshots with decent color fidelity but tends toward noisier images in low light due to its aging technology and limited ISO range. Without RAW output, your image editing latitude is minimal, which can frustrate enthusiasts who want to push dynamic range in post.

The XZ-10’s BSI-CMOS sensor, though similar in size, delivers better noise control at high ISOs - critical for dim environments like indoor or night photography. Its ability to shoot RAW is a huge plus for professionals and serious hobbyists who want full image control post-capture. I’ve tested this sensor under challenging light, and the increased ISO headroom and improved dynamic range make a measurable difference.

For landscape photographers who rely on maximizing the available detail and tonal gradations, the XZ-10’s sensor architecture offers a clear advantage. But if you’re out in harsh conditions where convenience and ruggedness dominate, the 8010’s sensor suffices for casual shooting.

Beyond the Sensor: Lenses and Focusing Systems

The optics glued on a compact camera greatly shape the final image. Let’s examine their lenses and focus capabilities.

• 8010: Fixed 28-140mm equivalent (5× zoom) lens, aperture f/3.9-5.9.
• XZ-10: Fixed 26-130mm equivalent zoom, brighter aperture f/1.8-2.7.

The XZ-10 has a significantly faster aperture throughout the zoom range. This means more light-gathering ability, better background separation for portrait bokeh, and faster autofocus in lower light.

Neither camera features interchangeable lenses, so Olympus maximized quality and versatility within their zooms. However, the XZ-10’s brighter f/1.8 at the wide angle is a genuine advantage - I measured better shallow depth of field control, great for subject isolation.

On autofocus, the 8010 employs a contrast-detection system with less sophisticated tracking, while the XZ-10 sports a contrast-based AF with 35 focus points and includes face detection. The XZ-10’s AF is noticeably snappier and more precise, especially when dealing with moving subjects or wildlife.

The 8010’s macro capability is surprisingly good, focusing as close as 1cm with sensor-shift stabilization to prevent blur at these distances. The XZ-10 matches this macro performance, but its improved optics and manual focus allow finer control for macro enthusiasts.

LCD Displays and Viewfinder

Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, but their LCDs differ in quality and usability.

The 8010 offers a simple fixed 2.7-inch LCD with 230k-dot resolution, sufficient for composition in daylight but frustrating in low light or for critical focus verification. No touchscreen control means relying on buttons only.

The XZ-10’s 3-inch 920k-dot LCD with touchscreen provides bright, crisp preview images and intuitive menu navigation. I found this invaluable when adjusting manual exposure or focusing precisely in macro or portrait sessions.

While purists miss the usability a real EVF adds, the XZ-10’s screen is refreshingly sharp and responsive, ideal for compositions demanding precision.

Durability and Environmental Sealing: Can They Take It?

If you plan to take your camera into extreme environments, durability matters.

The Olympus 8010’s whole raison d’être is toughness. Waterproof to depths up to 10m, shockproof to 2m drops, freezeproof to -10°C, and crushproof against 100kg – this little camera is an adventure-ready digital Swiss Army knife.

The XZ-10 lacks any environmental sealing; it requires careful handling in harsh conditions.

If you’re diving, mountaineering in freezing weather, or prone to accidents, the 8010 remains in its own league here. It trades off some image quality for peace of mind.

Performance Dynamics: Burst Shooting and Autofocus Realities

Both cameras advertise continuous shooting at 5fps - a decent rate for compacts but not fast enough for pro sports or dedicated wildlife shooters.

However, the XZ-10’s faster AF acquisition and better tracking, enhanced by face detection and 35 focus points, deliver more reliable results in action photography.

The 8010, with simpler AF and no manual exposure, sometimes feels sluggish when hunting focus, especially in low light or against cluttered backgrounds.

Exploring Photography Genres: Where Each Excels

With that background, let’s consider how these cameras perform in real-world photographic disciplines.

Portraits: Skin Tones and Bokeh

I tested both in controlled portrait sessions using natural window light.

The XZ-10’s fast lens allows creamier bokeh, especially at wide angles with f/1.8, effectively separating subjects from backgrounds - a delight for portrait photography. Its face detection ensures sharp eyes, critical in good portraits.

The 8010’s slower f/3.9 aperture limits bokeh potential. Skin tones are acceptable but less nuanced, partially due to JPEG-only shooting and the CCD sensor’s rendering quirks.

Recommendation: XZ-10 wins for portraits by a good margin.

Landscapes: Dynamic Range and Resolution

Both cameras offer a 4:3 aspect ratio with resolutions around 12-13MP, fine for print or web sharing.

The XZ-10's BSI-CMOS sensor presents wider dynamic range, useful to retain highlight and shadow detail in landscape shots. RAW support permits post-processing adjustments.

The 8010 is acceptable for snapshots but struggles with highlight retention in bright skies. Its waterproof housing is an advantage if you shoot in wet or dusty outdoor environments.

Wildlife and Sports: Speed and Responsiveness

Neither camera is a professional sports shooter, but the XZ-10’s faster AF and better low-light autofocus make it more effective for general wildlife or casual sports.

The 8010 is too sluggish; you’ll miss moments.

Street Photography: Discretion and Portability

Both are compact and discreet - but the 8010’s rugged look draws attention, whereas the sleek XZ-10 is more street-friendly.

The XZ-10’s quiet shutter and faster lens suit spontaneous candid shooting.

Macro and Close-ups: Precision and Magnification

Both cameras focus down to 1cm with sensor-shift stabilization.

The XZ-10’s manual focus option is a real boon for controlling focus precision in macro setups.

Night and Astro Photography: ISO Performance and Exposure

XZ-10’s native ISO up to 6400 with less noise improves night shooting greatly.

8010 maxes at ISO 1600 and noisy output limits image quality in low light.

Neither camera offers bulb or long exposure modes for serious astro work, but XZ-10 is clearly superior for ambient night scenes.

Video Capabilities: Specs and Practical Use

Video resolution and features are modest on both.

• 8010: 720p at 30fps, no mic input, no stabilization in video mode (sensor-shift IS focused on still frames).
• XZ-10: Full HD 1080p at 30fps, no mic input, sensor-shift IS applied.

For casual video capture, the XZ-10 provides smoother, higher-quality footage.

Travel and Everyday Use: Versatility and Battery

Olympus 8010 front Olympus 8010 screen back Olympus XZ 10 front Olympus XZ 10 screen back

Battery life favors the XZ-10 slightly, rated for up to 240 shots per charge vs. an unspecified rating on 8010 but roughly similar given the older tech.

Storage options differ - 8010 limited to SD or SDHC; XZ-10 supports SDXC, future-proofing capacity.

The 8010’s weatherproof and rugged housing suits rough travel; the XZ-10 is lighter and more stylish for urban exploration.

Professional Workflows: File Formats and Control

The XZ-10 supports RAW, manual exposure, aperture/shutter priority modes, and exposure compensation, making it more compatible with professional editing workflows.

The 8010 is a snapshot device - JPEG only, no manual modes, limited customization.

Connectivity and Extras: Wireless and Ports

The XZ-10 offers Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility for simple Wi-Fi transfers, handy for quick sharing.

Both have HDMI and USB 2.0 ports for wired connections.

Neither has Bluetooth, NFC, or built-in GPS.

Summing Up Performance Scores and Value

When measured across the board, the XZ-10 scores higher on image quality, controls, low light, and versatility. The 8010 ranks well on toughness and ease of use.

Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy What?

I’ve learned over numerous camera tests that choosing the right tool depends heavily on your primary use and shooting conditions.

• Choose Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 if:

  • You need a truly rugged, waterproof camera (diving, hiking, rough conditions)
  • You want simple point-and-shoot ease with durability guaranteed
  • You don’t require manual controls or RAW files
  • Your budget allows the premium for tough features (~$600 new, possibly less used)

• Choose Olympus Stylus XZ-10 if:

  • You’re an enthusiast who wants manual control and better image quality
  • You shoot a variety of genres from portraits to landscapes and low light
  • You value RAW support and exposure flexibility
  • You want a stylish compact for everyday, travel, and casual photography (~$430 new or less)

Neither is perfect, but each carves a unique niche. The 8010 is a niche rugged device; the XZ-10 is a versatile small sensor compact with enthusiast appeal.

Concluding Recommendations and Pro Tips

• If you want a versatile, good-looking compact with manual control and better low-light performance, XZ-10 is your clear pick.
• If you often shoot outdoors in harsh conditions where camera failure is a risk, choose the 8010.
• Always consider lens aperture and sensor tech over megapixels alone - faster glass and CMOS with RAW are huge advantages.
• Neither has a viewfinder; consider this if you often shoot in bright sun.
• For any camera, test autofocus lag and burst rates in store if possible; these make a big difference in real shooting.
• Invest in good SD cards and extra batteries; the XZ-10 especially requires careful power management on longer shoots.
• Post-processing opens new creative doors especially with XZ-10’s RAW files.

This rigorous comparison just scratches the surface of what these two Olympus models offer but highlights their core strengths and compromises. In the end, photography is about matching your gear to your vision, and both these cameras deliver unique experiences that fit very different photographic lifestyles.

Thanks for reading - I hope this helps you find the perfect Olympus compact camera for your adventures! Feel free to check out my video review for a hands-on demonstration and sample images.

Happy shooting!