Clicky

Sony A6400 vs Sony RX10 IV

Portability
83
Imaging
69
Features
88
Overall
76
Sony Alpha a6400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front
Portability
52
Imaging
53
Features
82
Overall
64

Sony A6400 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs

Sony A6400
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Push to 102400)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
  • Introduced January 2019
Sony RX10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Revealed September 2017
  • Old Model is Sony RX10 III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sony A6400 vs Sony RX10 IV: An Expert Hands-On Comparison for Every Photographer’s Needs

Selecting the right Sony camera among its diverse offerings can be daunting, especially when two models like the Sony Alpha a6400 and Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV present substantial but distinct capabilities. Having extensively tested both cameras in various shooting environments - from controlled lab settings to unpredictable real-world conditions - this article dives deep into their technical prowess, handling nuances, and suitability across photography disciplines. Read on as we provide an exhaustive comparison designed to empower enthusiasts and professionals alike in making an informed decision aligned with their creative goals and budgets.

First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics

Before delving into core specifications, appreciating the physical presence and usability often defines a photographer’s attachment and shooting comfort. The A6400, embodying Sony’s rangefinder-style mirrorless design, contrasts starkly with the DSLR-esque, bridge camera build of the RX10 IV.

Sony A6400 vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison

The A6400’s compact form factor (120x67x50 mm, 403 g) makes it an ideal choice for those prioritizing portability and discreet shooting - traits prized by travel, street, and even event photographers who value minimalism without sacrificing core controls. Conversely, the RX10 IV is bulkier and substantially heavier (133x94x145 mm, 1095 g), reflecting its integrated 24-600 mm 25x zoom lens and enhanced construction designed to facilitate longer telephoto work and extended grip comfort. The larger handgrip and more pronounced physical controls lend the RX10 IV a familiar familiar feel for action and wildlife shooters accustomed to DSLR ergonomics.

Sony A6400 vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison

Both cameras feature tilting 3-inch touchscreens, although the RX10 IV’s higher screen resolution (1440 vs. 922 k dots) affords finer preview details, beneficial especially during critical focus confirmation in macro and telephoto work. Neither camera has an articulating screen optimized for vlogging, but the A6400’s selfie-friendly tilt encourages front-facing capture, enhancing usability for content creators.

Sensor and Image Quality: APS-C vs. 1-Inch Performance

The A6400 wields a 24MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.6 mm), whereas the RX10 IV uses a smaller but custom 20MP 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (13.2 x 8.8 mm). These sensor choices inherently define their target applications and image quality envelopes.

Sony A6400 vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison

Dynamic Range and Color Depth
DxOmark ranks the A6400 highly, evidencing a superior dynamic range (~13.6 EV) and impressive color depth (24 bits), which translate into rich tonality and more latitude during highlight and shadow recovery in raw post-processing workflows. The RX10 IV, although not tested by DxOmark explicitly, with its smaller sensor and 20MP count, cannot match that top-tier capability. Still, it boasts commendable image quality for a fixed-lens superzoom, making it a versatile tool where convenience outweighs absolute sensor supremacy.

Low-Light Handling
The A6400 shines with a native ISO range of 100-32000, extendable to 102400, featuring lower noise levels and greater detail retention at high sensitivities - ideal for indoor events, night scenes, or astrophotography. Meanwhile, the RX10 IV’s ISO tops out at 12800 (25600 boosted), reflecting its more limited low-light prowess but compensated by its built-in optical image stabilization (absent in the A6400), aiding in handheld shooting slower shutter speeds.

Autofocus Systems: Speed Meets Precision

Autofocus technology represents one of the defining strengths of modern Sony cameras, and both models leverage Sony’s Bionz X processor and hybrid AF systems with phase-detection and contrast-detection.

The A6400 offers 425 focus points widely spread across the frame, including real-time eye AF for people and animals, delivering pinpoint accuracy crucial in portraiture and wildlife photography. Its autofocus acquisition speed is lightning-fast, especially benefiting tracking of unpredictable subjects and rapid subject re-acquisition after temporary blockages.

The RX10 IV has a more modest 315 AF points, still sufficient for most scenarios, coupled with a locking and tracking system optimized for telephoto subject isolation. Its 24 fps burst shooting with continuous AF extends its utility for high-speed action and wildlife sequences, far outperforming the A6400's 11 fps.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Assessing durability, both cameras feature environmental sealing that guards against dust and moisture - non-negotiable for photographers working in demanding outdoor conditions such as landscape or wildlife photography. However, neither is rated as waterproof, crushproof, or freezeproof, which means caution is required in extreme weather contexts.

The RX10 IV’s heft and solid build support heavier use, often shaking off fatigue during all-day shoots with heavier zoom requirements. Conversely, the lighter A6400 demands additional care in rough scenarios but rewards users with greater mobility.

Viewing Systems: Electronic Viewfinders and Screens

Sony provides excellent electronic viewfinders (EVFs) on both models with 2.36-million dot resolution, 100% coverage, and approximately 0.7x magnification, delivering razor-sharp framing previews and vital exposure feedback.

While both have tilting touchscreens, the RX10 IV’s top LCD (absent on the A6400) offers quick exposure info, ISO, and battery status review - features appreciated by photojournalists and professionals seeking faster manual adjustments.

Sony A6400 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The touchscreen implementation on the A6400 supports intuitive touch focus and menu navigation, while the RX10 IV tempers touchscreen capabilities with physical control prominence, a trade-off favoring users who prioritize tactile feedback, especially in bright outdoor conditions where touch screens sometimes falter.

Lens Ecosystem and Versatility

Perhaps the largest practical divergence lies in their lens architecture. The A6400 employs Sony’s E-mount system, compatible with over 120 lenses ranging from compact primes to professional telephotos. This flexibility suits photographers intending to build a dedicated system for specialized needs, from sweeping landscapes to macro close-ups.

In stark contrast, the RX10 IV sports an integrated, non-interchangeable 24-600 mm f/2.4-4 lens, an extraordinary superzoom encompassing wide to extreme telephoto focal lengths with minimal aperture variation and fast maximum apertures for a long zoom. This lens is optically stabilized, internally focused, and designed to minimize aberrations across its range.

For photographers who prefer an all-in-one solution without lens swaps - travelers, event shooters, and wildlife enthusiasts who value fast response at various focal lengths - the RX10 IV offers unmatched convenience. However, this non-modular approach limits ultimate optical specialization achievable via prime or specialty lenses with the A6400.

Performance Across Photography Genres

Portrait Photography

The A6400’s superior sensor size, real-time eye AF, and vast autofocus points equip it well for portrait work demanding precise skin tone rendition and delicately blurred backgrounds. Using fast prime lenses such as the Sony 50mm f/1.8 or 85mm f/1.8, photographers can exploit the APS-C sensor’s depth of field control to achieve creamy bokeh and excellent subject separation.

Conversely, while the RX10 IV’s lens offers f/2.4-4 apertures across focal lengths, it cannot match the shallow depth of field consistency or maximum aperture width prime lenses provide. Its eye AF performs admirably but less flexibly due to sensor and lens design constraints.

Landscape Photography

Here, the A6400’s better dynamic range and 24MP resolution make it a natural favorite, capturing fine textural details vital for landscapes. Though the RX10 IV’s ultra-wide 24 mm start is appealing, its smaller sensor limits expansive tonal gradation and resolution.

However, the RX10 IV includes an internal polarizer filter and excellent zoom versatility - beneficial for compressed telephoto landscape compression effects in distant mountain ranges, for example - plus optical stabilization essential for slow ISO and handheld shots.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

The RX10 IV’s unique combination of 24 fps shooting speed, integrated 600 mm reach, and optical image stabilization creates a compelling package for wildlife and sports enthusiasts unwilling to carry multiple lenses. Its lack of interchangeable lenses is less a hindrance for users content with the superzoom.

Yet, the A6400 can be paired with professional zooms such as the Sony 70-350 mm OSS lens, offering superior image quality, faster apertures, and specialized features, albeit with added weight and cost. Its advanced AF system also provides top-notch tracking accuracy for fast action.

Street and Travel Photography

The compactness and agility of the A6400 make it ideal for street and travel photographers seeking a discrete, lightweight system without compromising image quality. Its silent electronic shutter and tilting screen help capture candid street moments.

The RX10 IV’s versatility enables tracking distant subjects for travel wildlife or sports, but size and weight may restrict quick reactions in hectic urban contexts.

Macro Photography

Neither camera is a dedicated macro system, but the RX10 IV’s 3 cm minimum focus distance at telephoto lengths offers surprising close-up capabilities with stabilization. Meanwhile, the A6400’s compatibility with specialized macro lenses yields higher image quality and precision focus stacking options.

Night and Astro Photography

Thanks to the A6400’s larger imaging sensor, lower noise performance, and robust dynamic range, it excels in dimly lit scenes including astrophotography. While internal image stabilization is absent, sturdy tripods and remote shutter controls mitigate these gaps.

The RX10 IV’s optical stabilization and fast lens aid handheld low-light work, but smaller sensor size limits noise control at extreme ISOs critical for star-field capture.

Video Capabilities: Comparing the Moving Image Potential

Video shooters will find each Sony camera offers 4K UHD capture at 30p, but differences in codecs, sound input options, and stabilization separate their suitability.

  • Sony A6400: Records 4K UHD at 30p/100 Mbps using the XAVC S codec with clean HDMI output, supports microphone input but lacks headphone jack for audio monitoring (a potential drawback for professional videographers). It also provides full pixel readout without pixel binning, contributing to sharp video footage.

  • Sony RX10 IV: Offers 4K 30p/25p/24p recording in XAVC S and AVCHD formats, includes both external mic and headphone jacks, and crucially, features optical image stabilization that significantly smooths handheld video capture. The RX10 IV is a better turnkey superzoom video camera but limited by smaller sensor characteristics.

Neither supports advanced video features like 10-bit output or high frame rate 4K modes, signaling their positioning as hybrid rather than cinema-grade tools.

Battery Life and Storage Considerations

Both share the NP-FW50 battery type:

  • The A6400 slightly edges out in longevity, rating approximately 410 shots per charge versus the RX10 IV’s 400 - a minor difference but relevant on long shoots without spares.

They each rely on single SD card slots, compatible with UHS-I cards. The RX10 IV additionally supports Sony Memory Stick formats, reflecting legacy versatility but less critical today.

Connectivity and Additional Features

Both cameras incorporate built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for remote control and wireless file transfer, supporting Sony’s Imaging Edge mobile apps. Their USB 2.0 ports limit tethering speeds compared to newer implementations but remain functional.

The RX10 IV’s HDMI interface facilitates external monitor output with higher bit depth, appealing to serious videographers. Both lack GPS units, which is notable for geotagging dependent workflows.

Pricing and Value Proposition

At list prices around $900 (A6400) versus $1700 (RX10 IV), the decision partially hinges on priorities between interchangeable lens flexibility and all-in-one zoom convenience.

The A6400’s lower cost, superior sensor performance, and lens ecosystem arguably provide better long-term value for photographers willing to invest time and resources into system expansion.

The RX10 IV’s premium price is justified by its one-lens versatility, blazing continuous shooting, and stabilized telephoto capability attractive to event, wildlife, or travel shooters aiming to minimize kit bulk.

Objective Scoring and Performance Analytics

To crystallize this detailed evaluation, we synthesized test results and real-world performance through comprehensive scoring.

The A6400 ranks higher in image quality and low light scores, while the RX10 IV excels in continuous shooting and telephoto versatility.

When broken down by photography type:

  • Portraits, Landscapes, Macro, and Night/Astro: Sony A6400 leads due to sensor superiority and interchangeable lenses.
  • Wildlife, Sports, and Travel: Sony RX10 IV shines with extended telephoto reach, high burst rates, and robust stabilization.
  • Street Photography and Video: A6400 favored for smaller size and advanced video features.

Gallery: Sample Images for Visual Reference

The following gallery presents paired sample images captured with each camera under varied lighting and subjects, illustrating their imaging strengths and rendering differences.

Close scrutiny shows the A6400’s advantage in noise control and color fidelity, while the RX10 IV impresses with sharpness and reach without lens change.

Final Recommendations: Best Fit by User Needs

Choose the Sony A6400 if you:

  • Prioritize image quality with an APS-C sensor offering wider dynamic range and noise performance.
  • Need an expandable lens system to explore diverse optical effects and specialties.
  • Shoot portraits, landscapes, macro, or night scenes demanding subtle tonal gradations.
  • Desire a lightweight, compact camera suitable for street and travel without compromising versatility.
  • Are an enthusiast or professional prioritizing photo-centric workflows with occasional video.

Choose the Sony RX10 IV if you:

  • Require an all-in-one superzoom bridge camera with exceptional 24-600 mm focal length range.
  • Shoot high-speed action or wildlife requiring up to 24 fps burst with reliable autofocus tracking.
  • Value optical image stabilization for sharp handheld shots at telephoto and video.
  • Need video outputs including headphone monitoring and balanced audio inputs.
  • Want a robust, weather-sealed camera capable of enduring extended outdoor conditions without lens swaps.

Conclusion: Two Sony Cameras Tailored to Different Creative Journeys

The Sony A6400 and RX10 IV each exemplify Sony’s commitment to innovation and quality but serve notably different use cases. Hands-on testing confirms the A6400’s place as a compact, high-quality, upgradeable imaging platform, favored by photographers who want control and creative freedom. Meanwhile, the RX10 IV’s integrated superzoom and speed cater to action-hungry shooters needing flexibility and convenience without carrying multiple lenses.

Prospective buyers should weigh these factors with their personal vision, shooting style, and budget in mind. By carefully evaluating how each camera’s strengths align with their artistic ambitions, photographers can confidently invest in a Sony model that empowers their next photographic chapter.

For further technical questions or tailored advice, feel free to consult our detailed Sony camera ecosystem guides and hands-on reviews.

Sony A6400 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony A6400 and Sony RX10 IV
 Sony Alpha a6400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
General Information
Brand Sony Sony
Model Sony Alpha a6400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
Type Advanced Mirrorless Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2019-01-15 2017-09-12
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by Bionz X Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 6000 x 4000 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 32000 12800
Maximum boosted ISO 102400 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 425 315
Lens
Lens mounting type Sony E fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-600mm (25.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 121 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.7
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 922 thousand dot 1,440 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,359 thousand dot 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.7x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed 11.0fps 24.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 6.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/2000s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 403 gr (0.89 lb) 1095 gr (2.41 lb)
Dimensions 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 83 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.6 not tested
DXO Low light score 1431 not tested
Other
Battery life 410 images 400 images
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-FW50 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $898 $1,698