Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS200
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus 8010 and Panasonic ZS200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") use totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 8010 was manufactured 9 years before the ZS200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the 8010 grades against the ZS200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Panasonic ZS200
8010 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus 8010
ZS200 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | February 2010 | Fresher by 97 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Panasonic ZS200
8010 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 8010 has outside dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8010 and Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the 8010 against the ZS200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and ZS200 is 92 and 86 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The visual here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 8010 and ZS200.
All in all, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 8010 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Panasonic ZS200 will render greater detail due to its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older 8010 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Alternate name | mju Tough 8010 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 340g (0.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $600 | $800 |