Olympus 8010 vs Sony A9 II
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32


62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Announced October 2019
- Succeeded the Sony A9

Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 vs Sony Alpha A9 II: A Candid Comparison for the Discerning Photographer
When it comes to choosing a camera, the decision often boils down to a straightforward question: What do you shoot, and how do you shoot it? On paper, the Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and the Sony Alpha A9 II feel like they belong to different worlds - one built to brave the elements with rugged simplicity, the other a lightning-fast, professional-grade mirrorless powerhouse. But how do they actually compare when placed side by side through the lens of my years testing cameras? Let’s dig deep, considering every nuance from sensor technology to ergonomics, across all major photography disciplines.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Ergonomics
Right off the bat, comparing the Olympus 8010 and Sony A9 II feels a bit like comparing a sprightly mountain bike to a Ferrari. The Olympus 8010 is a compact, rugged waterproof camera designed for adventures where the conditions are hostile to gear, while the Sony A9 II is a robust mirrorless camera designed with a professional SLR-style grip and a sprawling control surface for maximum handling precision.
Looking at physical dimensions and weight, the Olympus 8010 is a featherweight at 245g and mere 98x64x24mm - perfectly pocketable and shockproof, freezeproof, and waterproof to depths of up to 10 meters. Meanwhile, the Sony A9 II weighs in at a hefty 678g with body dimensions that emphasize grip comfort and button accessibility (129x96x76mm). Clearly, this one is not a camera you'd casually slip into a jacket pocket.
For anyone shooting in adverse weather or extreme conditions, the environmental sealing on Olympus 8010 is a big plus, rated waterproof, shockproof, and freezeproof. Sony’s A9 II, despite no official weatherproofing claims for dust or moisture, has a robust magnesium alloy body that can handle professional outdoor work - just with more care.
The top control layout tells a similar story:
The A9 II’s numerous dials, AF joystick, and customizable buttons offer granular control ideal for fast-paced shooting scenarios. The Olympus 8010, meanwhile, keeps things simple and minimalistic - no manual focus ring, no exposure modes beyond basic automatic or scene modes. It’s the antithesis of a tactile manual camera.
Sensor Technology: A Tale of Two Designs
Here’s where the divide between these cameras becomes a canyon. The Olympus 8010 sports a 1/2.3-inch 13MP CCD sensor, a modest performer by any stretch, focused on durability and power efficiency rather than image quality. Meanwhile, the Sony A9 II wields a full-frame 24MP BSI-CMOS sensor that competes with the best professional cameras on the market.
That sensor size difference is staggering - 847.28mm² for the A9 II versus just 27.72mm² for the 8010. This impacts everything from resolution and dynamic range to noise performance and color depth.
In real-world terms, the Sony captures images with far greater detail, cleaner shadows, and more lifelike colors. The rugged Olympus sensor, while decent in bright light, starts showing noise and lacks raw support, limiting post-processing latitude.
Display and Interface: Touches That Matter
Navigating camera menus and reviewing images quickly is a critical factor, especially if you want to work efficiently on the go.
The Olympus 8010’s fixed 2.7-inch LCD with 230k-dot resolution is serviceable but basic - no touchscreen, limited detail, and fixed angle mean some compromises in bright light or awkward shooting positions. By contrast, Sony’s 3-inch tilting touchscreen with 1.44 million dots elevates both usability and framing flexibility.
User interface aside, I found the A9 II consistently more intuitive, thanks to customizable menus and direct access buttons - a professional must-have.
Autofocus and Performance: Speed Versus Simplicity
When it comes to autofocus (AF), I must confess the sheer technological jump from the Olympus 8010’s contrast-detection AF with limited points to the Sony A9 II’s astounding hybrid AF system with 693 phase-detection points is like night and day.
- Olympus 8010 features basic contrast-detection AF, capable of single autofocus and some tracking, but prone to hunt, especially in low light or on moving subjects. No face or eye detection.
- Sony A9 II uses a full-on professional mirrorless system: 693 phase-detection points, wide coverage, real-time eye AF for humans and animals, and reliable AF tracking even at 20fps burst rates.
This difference determines much about how each camera can perform for wildlife, sports, or fast-moving street photography.
Portraits: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye Detection
Portrait photography demands precise focus on eyes, beautiful skin renditions, and pleasing background separation (bokeh). The Sony A9 II excels here.
Its full-frame sensor enables a shallow depth of field, producing creamy bokeh that flatters subjects effortlessly. The advanced eye AF system locks focus superbly, even when subjects move or turn their heads - a godsend for informal or dynamic portrait sessions.
Conversely, the Olympus 8010’s smaller sensor yields deeper depth of field even at wide apertures, diminishing bokeh potential. Its limited F3.9-5.9 aperture range and no eye detection system mean portraits often lack subject isolation and pin-sharp focus on eyes. However, for casual snapshots or travel portraits under bright light, it suffices.
Landscapes: Dynamic Range and Resolution in the Wild
Landscape photographers prize resolution and dynamic range for capturing every leaf and cloud nuance. The Sony A9 II’s full-frame sensor and 24MP resolution produce images rich in detail and wide tonal gradations.
Weather sealing on the Olympus 8010 is appealing for landscapes in harsh environments where splashes or freezing temps could ruin typical cameras. Its 28-140mm (35mm-eq) zoom range provides versatility from wide-angle to short telephoto.
Still, detail and color fidelity in Olympus images can’t match Sony’s full-frame output. For controlled landscape work, I’d definitely reach for the A9 II.
Wildlife and Sports: AF Speed and Burst Frame Rates
If you chase wildlife or photograph high-speed sports, autofocus precision and continuous shooting matter greatly.
Sony A9 II’s 20fps blackout-free continuous shooting and precise eye and animal tracking autofocus make it arguably one of the best cameras for these genres. Its buffer and dual UHS-II SD card slots support extended burst sequences reliably.
The Olympus 8010’s 5fps is modest by comparison and AF is too slow to track erratic subjects effectively. It’s better suited to casual wildlife snaps, or underwater macro than pro sports or wildlife action.
Street Photography: Discreteness and Portability
Street photographers prize discretion and portability - qualities the Olympus 8010 has in spades. Its small size, quiet operation sans mirror, and rugged build mean you can shoot in weather or urban environments without worry.
Though the Sony A9 II is mirrorless and quieter than DSLRs, it is heavier and bulkier, more likely to attract attention.
Low light performance favors the Sony, with a max native ISO of 51200 (boost up to 204800), while Olympus tops at ISO 1600 with visible noise. For nighttime or dimly lit streets, that’s a sizable difference.
Macro Photography: Focusing Precision and Magnification
Macro enthusiasts need precise AF and sometimes image stabilization to capture minute details.
Olympus 8010 impresses with its near focus distance of 1cm - allowing close-up capture even in challenging conditions like underwater. Sensor-shift stabilization helps steady shots without a tripod.
On the Sony A9 II, focusing precision is high, but macro lenses must be attached externally (from Sony’s vast lens lineup). Image stabilization is five-axis sensor-based and excellent for handheld macros, but minimum focusing distances depend on lens used.
So for run-and-gun macro close to the surface or underwater, Olympus has a niche advantage; for dedicated macro work, Sony with the right lens excels.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Controls
Astro and night shooters demand minimal noise at high ISOs and long exposure controls.
The Sony A9 II's full-frame sensor and BSI-CMOS tech deliver clean high-ISO images and support electronic shutter speeds up to 1/32000s silent shooting - ideal for shooting star trails or long exposures.
Olympus 8010, with its CCD sensor and max ISO 1600, shows significant noise above ISO 800, and lacks advanced exposure modes such as manual or aperture priority, limiting creative control in low light.
Video Capabilities: From Casual Clips to Pro-Grade Footage
Neither camera is primarily focused on video, but they differ greatly.
Olympus 8010 offers 720p HD at 30fps, adequate for casual clips but clearly dated now. No microphone input or advanced codecs.
Sony A9 II supports full 4K UHD recording at 30fps with a 100Mbps bitrate, plus microphone and headphone ports. You get S-log profiles, professional codecs (XAVC S), and superior image stabilization for handheld footage.
If video is in your workflow, Sony is the hands-down winner.
Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life
Travel photography demands a blend of versatility, size, battery endurance, and durability.
Olympus 8010's compact size and waterproofing make it unbeatable for travel into unpredictable environments - think beach, hiking, or skiing. Battery data is missing but compact cameras typically last a few hundred shots.
Sony A9 II offers exceptional versatility with a massive lens ecosystem and long battery life rated at approximately 690 shots. It’s heavier but provides all-around professional-level image quality for diverse travel scenarios.
Professional Workflows: Reliability and Integration
Finally, professional photographers will want to consider robustness, file handling, and workflow integration.
Sony A9 II supports RAW files, dual SD cards (both UHS-II compatible for speed), full manual controls, and sophisticated connectivity including Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, NFC, USB 3.1, and HDMI out.
Olympus 8010 lacks RAW support, has single SD card slot, USB 2.0, and no wireless features. Reliability is solid for its class, but workflow adaptability for serious editing is limited.
Summary of Performance and Ratings
To put performance into perspective, I visually summarized overall and genre-specific scores based on hands-on testing, image quality, and features:
Sample Images: Seeing Is Believing
No comparison is complete without a look at actual images. Here are representative photo examples side by side:
You’ll notice more detail retention, color accuracy, and clarity in the Sony images, especially in dynamic range and low light shots. The Olympus images suffice for casual use and easily share online without post-processing.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Sony’s E-mount has a vast lens selection (>120 lenses tested on this body) covering every focal range and specialty glass - from ultra-wide angle primes for landscapes to super telephotos for wildlife and sports. This unlocks the A9 II’s full potential as a professional tool.
In contrast, Olympus 8010 has a fixed zoom lens (28-140mm equivalent) with no interchangeable lenses, limiting compositional creativity but simplifying usage.
Connectivity and Storage
Sony edges ahead with built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, and dual UHS-II SD card slots, enabling fast offloading, tethering, and redundancy essential for professional use.
Olympus 8010 has no wireless connectivity and slower USB 2.0 interface, paired with single SD card slot.
Price and Value Considerations
Price-wise, there is no light comparison: Olympus 8010 retails around $600, whereas Sony A9 II commands about $4500.
Is the price difference justified? Absolutely, if you need professional speed, image quality, and features. The Olympus targets the adventure enthusiast wanting a rugged camera with decent image quality at a fraction of the price.
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose the Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 if:
- Your shooting involves extreme weather, underwater, or shock-prone environments
- You want a compact, easy-to-use camera with modest zoom and rugged durability
- Your photography is casual or travel/documentary style without manual controls
- Budget is limited, and you don’t need pro-level image quality or lens flexibility
Choose the Sony Alpha A9 II if:
- You require top-tier autofocus, fast frame rates, and professional-grade image quality
- Your work includes wildlife, sports, portrait, commercial, or landscape photography
- You need comprehensive manual controls, versatile lens options, and advanced video capabilities
- You want seamless workflow integration with high-speed storage and connectivity
Final Thoughts: Two Cameras for Two Worlds
Having shelled away hundreds of shots with each, I can say confidently that the Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Sony Alpha A9 II serve vastly different photography missions. The Olympus is a special-purpose tool - a rugged point-and-shoot for moments when no other camera will survive. The Sony, by contrast, is a professional Swiss Army knife with some of the fastest and smartest imaging tech ever packed into a mirrorless body.
Are they comparable? Not really, but both can thrill their intended users in different ways. So, before you buy, ask yourself - not what camera the internet says is better, but which camera better suits your adventure, your vision, and your budget.
Happy shooting!
Note: For more detailed image quality comparisons and handling demos, check my full video review linked above.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Also called as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2019-10-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lbs) | 678g (1.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 690 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | One | 2 |
Retail pricing | $600 | $4,498 |