Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH8
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-6.4) lens
- 123g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH8 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FH8, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FH8 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FH8 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was brought out 4 years after the FH8 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH8 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the FH8 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH8 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic FH8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FH8
E-M1 II | FH8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | January 2012 | Newer by 58 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH8 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FH8 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FH8
E-M1 II | FH8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH8 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic FH8 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 123 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FH8 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the FH8.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and FH8 is 68 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH8 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The image underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and FH8.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will deliver more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH8 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FH8 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 4cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 123g (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 260 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $149 |