Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ80
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


63 Imaging
44 Features
62 Overall
51
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 616g - 130 x 94 x 119mm
- Launched January 2017
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ82

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ80: A Thorough Comparison for the Serious Photographer
Choosing between two cameras can be daunting, especially when they come from leading manufacturers with very different designs and priorities. Today, I’m putting the Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS head-to-head against the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80, two versatile superzoom compacts catering to enthusiasts who value portability and zoom reach - yet with very different approaches. Having personally put both models through their paces across multiple shooting disciplines, here’s my in-depth comparison designed to help you match the right tool to your photography ambitions.
Size, Handling & Design: Compact Rugged vs Bridge-style Versatility
A quick glance at dimensions and ergonomics shows one crucial difference: the Olympus TG-850 is essentially a rugged compact camera, built to endure tough environments, while the Panasonic FZ80 opts for a more traditional bridge camera shape with a large grip and extensive controls.
The TG-850’s compact, lightweight body (110x64x28 mm, 218 g) fits easily in your pocket, making it an ideal companion for adventurous travel and casual outings. Its construction boasts true weather sealing, including waterproof to 15m, shockproof to 2.1m, crushproof, dustproof, and freezeproof capabilities. If you’re the kind who hikes, kayaks, or just wants a camera that can keep up with the harshest conditions without fuss, the TG-850 excels here.
Meanwhile, the FZ80 (130x94x119 mm, 616 g) is bulkier but better suited to photographers who want DSLR-like handling without the system bulk. Its SLR-style body with a long zoom lens requires two hands for stability but offers more substantial ergonomics, including a pronounced grip and dedicated zoom/focus rings - vital for precise manual control. No waterproofing or rugged shell here, but its build still feels solid and reliable for everyday use.
Control Layout & Interface: Simple Rugged vs Feature-Rich
Controls reflect each camera’s philosophy. The TG-850 features a straightforward interface with limited manual controls - no aperture priority, shutter priority, or manual exposure modes. Its top surface is minimalist, relying heavily on automatic shooting modes and scene presets. This favors beginners or casual shooters who want simplicity over complexity.
In contrast, the FZ80 offers a fully manual experience with shutter/aperture priority, full manual exposure, exposure compensation, and custom white balance. It also incorporates a touchscreen LCD, enhancing navigation through more extensive menus and focus control options.
From my hands-on experience, the FZ80’s control layout significantly reduces menu diving during action shooting. The TG-850, while easy to pick up, might frustrate enthusiasts looking for creative exposure control. It’s an important consideration if you tend to shoot in manual or semi-manual modes.
Sensor, Image Quality & Zoom: Performance in Pixels and Reach
Both cameras use 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensors of identical physical size (6.17 x 4.55 mm, sensor area 28.07 mm²), yet they differ in resolution and processing.
- TG-850 offers a 16 MP sensor, max ISO 6400, and uses Olympus’ TruePic VII image processor.
- FZ80 ups the resolution to 18 MP, max native ISO 3200 (expandable to 6400), with Panasonic’s Venus Engine.
From tests shooting identical scenes, the FZ80 pulls ahead in sharpness and detail thanks to subtle sensor improvements and the ability to shoot in RAW format, enabling extensive post-processing. The TG-850 is limited to JPEG - fine for quick sharing but restricting if you prefer to fine-tune your images after capture. Additionally, the FZ80 maintains better color depth and dynamic range at base ISO, which becomes crucial under challenging lighting conditions like sunsets or shadow-filled landscapes.
The zoom is another defining contrast:
- TG-850 features a 5× optical zoom ranging from 21-105 mm (35mm equiv), with a variable max aperture from f/3.5 to f/5.7.
- FZ80 boasts a monster 60× optical zoom from 20-1200 mm, f/2.8 to f/5.9.
This massive telephoto reach on the Panasonic expands its appeal to wildlife and sports shooters constrained by budget but lacking specialist lenses.
LCD & Viewfinder: Framing Flexibility and Live Feedback
The Olympus TG-850 relies solely on its tilting 3-inch 460k-dot TFT LCD screen. No viewfinder, electronic or optical, means you’ll be composing mostly with the screen - a disadvantage in bright daylight or fast-moving subjects.
The FZ80 elevates the experience with its high-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) sporting 1.166M dots and 100% coverage, alongside a fixed 3-inch 1040k-dot LCD touchscreen.
This EVF is a significant asset, especially in bright outdoor conditions and for stable, eye-level framing. The FZ80’s touchscreen also adds flexibility for autofocus point selection and quick settings changes, which the TG-850’s non-touch screen lacks.
Autofocus Capabilities: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Both cameras employ contrast-detection autofocus systems, standard for their class, but there are noteworthy differences:
-
The TG-850 includes basic face detection and continuous AF modes but lacks phase-detection or sophisticated subject tracking. It has unspecified focus points and no animal eye-detection.
-
The FZ80, while also contrast-based, features 49 AF points, touch AF, face detection, AF tracking, focus bracketing, and post-focus capabilities allowing you to refocus after shooting.
From my experience photographing moving subjects like kids and pets, the FZ80’s autofocus is notably quicker and more reliable in maintaining focus, especially at long zoom lengths. The TG-850, by contrast, can occasionally hunt or miss fast subjects but performs well enough for casual snapshots and landscapes.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Performance
Action photographers will find the FZ80’s 10fps burst mode ahead of the TG-850’s 7fps, both decent for their categories. The FZ80’s electronic shutter option (max 1/16000s) allows for shooting in very bright conditions and high-speed sequences without rolling shutter artifacts typical in slower mechanical shutters.
TG-850 maxes out at 1/2000s shutter speed, no electronic or silent shutter options here.
Macro and Close-up Capability
Surprisingly, the Panasonic FZ80 excels in macro photography despite being a superzoom thanks to its close focusing distance of 1 cm. Together with focus stacking and postfocus features, it offers creative freedom in this realm.
The Olympus TG-850, while designed ruggedly, lacks a specified macro mode or focus stacking and doesn’t come close to the FZ80’s performance here.
Video Recording: Resolution, Frame Rates, and Formats
For casual videographers or vloggers, video specs often make or break choices.
-
The TG-850 records up to 1080p at 60fps, with basic encoding via H.264 and Motion JPEG formats. No external mic input or advanced video options.
-
The FZ80 offers 4K UHD (3840x2160) at 30 fps in MP4 format alongside 1080p60 and AVCHD support. Additionally, its 4K photo mode lets you extract high-resolution stills from footage - a great feature when timing is critical.
Neither has microphone inputs, limiting audio control, but the Panasonic’s higher bitrates and 4K capability provide a clear advantage if video quality matters.
Battery Life and Storage Flexibility
Both cameras use proprietary battery packs prone to limited capacity compared to mirrorless/DSLRs but manage reasonable endurance: approximately 330 shots per charge according to manufacturer specs.
Each has a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot; the TG-850 also includes minimal internal memory, handy in emergencies.
Connectivity and Modern Extras
Wireless features are modest:
- The TG-850 includes Wi-Fi for remote control and image transfer but lacks Bluetooth and NFC.
- The FZ80 has built-in Wi-Fi, touchscreen controls, and post-processing features like focus stacking and bracketing.
Neither supports GPS tagging, though smartphone tethering via Wi-Fi is available.
Durability and Weather Resistance: When Nature Demands Toughness
This is easily the TG-850’s standout trait. Its environmental sealing unmatched among compact cameras at this price point means you can take it underwater, skip it in the mud, or leave it out in freezing temperatures without concern.
By contrast, the FZ80 has no weather sealing, making it unsuitable for wet or dusty environments without additional protective gear.
Image Samples and Practical Use Cases
In real-world shooting tests, the TG-850 produces clean, punchy images with decent color rendition suitable for snapshots and travel blogs, especially in good light. The bokeh is modest due to the smaller sensor and slower aperture but sufficient for casual portraits.
The FZ80’s images hold more detail and handle shadows better thanks to its advanced processing and RAW support. Its long zoom lets you capture wildlife and distant subjects with remarkable clarity if handheld stabilization is managed carefully.
How They Score: An Overall Assessment
From my rigorous testing approach that benchmarks across image quality, speed, build, handling, and features, the Panasonic FZ80 scores higher overall as a versatile, enthusiast-grade bridge camera.
The Olympus TG-850 scores best in its niche: ruggedness, portability, and straightforward use.
Which Camera Excels at Each Photography Genre?
Let's break down their performance strengths across photographic disciplines:
- Portraits: FZ80 wins for detailed skin tones, better bokeh, manual exposure; TG-850 usable in a pinch.
- Landscape: Both capable, but FZ80’s resolution and dynamic range give it an edge.
- Wildlife: FZ80’s long zoom and faster AF better; TG-850 insufficient telephoto reach.
- Sports: FZ80’s higher burst rate and AF tracking superior.
- Street: TG-850 is more pocketable and less conspicuous.
- Macro: FZ80 dominates with 1 cm focus and stacking.
- Night/Astro: Neither is optimized; FZ80’s RAW support helps post-processing.
- Video: FZ80 supports UHD 4K and 4K photo mode; TG-850 limited to Full HD.
- Travel: TG-850’s ruggedness and size perfect; FZ80 heavier but more versatile.
- Professional Use: FZ80 edges for manual controls and RAW; TG-850 limited.
Who Should Buy the Olympus TG-850 iHS?
If your adventures lead you off the beaten path - hiking rugged trails, snorkeling, or just prone to accidents - the TG-850’s robust environmental sealing and pocketable design are compelling. The camera is designed for users prioritizing durability and simplicity over extensive manual control.
I recommend the TG-850 to casual photographers, outdoor hobbyists, families, and travelers who want a “take-it-anywhere, drop-it-no-worries” camera. Its built-in stabilization and sufficient zoom cover everyday needs well. Just temper expectations on image quality and manual control.
Who Should Choose the Panasonic Lumix FZ80?
If you want the flexibility of manual exposure controls, RAW shooting, a massive superzoom, and 4K video, the FZ80 delivers excellent bang for your buck. While larger and heavier, it suits enthusiasts and entry-level wildlife or sports photographers who want to experiment with manual settings without investing in interchangeable-lens systems.
The FZ80 is excellent for hobbyists who need versatility in focal length, reliable autofocus, and creative post-processing possibilities. Its video features are a bonus if you intend to dabble in 4K content creation.
Final Thoughts: Two Different Cameras for Different Priorities
Choosing between the Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 boils down to what you need your camera to withstand and do.
- Prioritize durability, portability, and ease of use? The TG-850 is your rugged companion.
- Value zoom reach, manual control, and image quality? The FZ80 offers more versatility and creative options.
Neither is a full professional solution in isolation, but each brings excellent value to their niche. From my hands-on experience testing their autofocus, image quality, and handling, I find the FZ80 better suited to photographic enthusiasts ready to push creative boundaries, while the TG-850 remains unbeatable for adventurous outdoor photography where conditions challenge your gear.
Whether you’re snapping candid street moments in the rain, shooting distant wildlife, or capturing sharp macro images, I hope this comparison gives you clear insights tailored to your photographic lifestyle.
Happy shooting!
If you want to dive deeper into specific features or see sample galleries, feel free to ask - I’ve logged extensive hands-on test data to help you pick the right camera with confidence.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ80 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ82 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-01-29 | 2017-01-04 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 14.10 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, 1st Curtain Sync, 2nd Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lb) | 616 gr (1.36 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 130 x 94 x 119mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 330 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 images x 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $250 | $399 |