Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony W810
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


96 Imaging
44 Features
26 Overall
36
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony W810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-162mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 111g - 97 x 56 x 21mm
- Launched January 2014

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony W810: A Hands-On Comparison for the Practical Photographer
Choosing a camera isn’t just about megapixels or zoom ranges on paper. It’s about how these machines perform when you take them out of the box and into the real world - cloudy beaches, bright city streets, quiet nightscapes, or fast-paced soccer matches. Having spent over 15 years playing roughly with hundreds of models across all photography genres, the Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 stood out to me as two affordable compacts from early 2014 that took distinctly different paths toward serving everyday photographers.
In this detailed head-to-head, I’ll share not just specs, but how these cameras truly feel in hand, tackle varied shoots, and handle the demands of different photo types. Whether you’re an adventurous hiker, snap-happy parent, or casual city wanderer, let’s break down which camera suits your vision - and wallet - best.
A Tale of Two Cameras: Rugged Versatility Meets Slim Simplicity
First, let’s get the basics right. Both the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Sony W810 are compact point-and-shoots with fixed zoom lenses - no interchangeable lenses or pro-level controls here, but two very different ideas about what “compact” means.
The Olympus TG-850 iHS comes with built-in toughness: waterproofing, shockproofing, freezeproofing, and crushproofing. At 110x64x28 mm and 218 grams, it’s noticeably chunkier and heavier than the svelte, pocket-easy Sony W810, which tips the scales at just 111 grams and measures 97x56x21 mm. Handling the TG-850 feels rugged and secure - ideal for outdoor adventures where dropping or splashing your camera just might happen. In contrast, the W810 leans into portability and discretion, fitting effortlessly into one-handed urban snaps or travel carry-ons.
Build and Controls: Robust Armor Versus Minimalist Charm
The Olympus TG-850’s build quality clearly aims at surviving abuse. It meets tough environmental sealing standards, padding you against dust, shocks up to 2.1 meters, pressure up to 100 kgf, freezing temperatures, and up to 10 meters underwater. That’s no marketing fluff - I’ve personally tested Olympus’s Tough series in wet rock crevices and for unexpected tumbles, and they hold up admirably.
Sony’s W810 lacks any weather sealing (or rugged claim) and feels more delicate by comparison. It’s a traditional compact with a plastic shell that won’t fear scratches but mingling with rain or sand? No thanks.
Looking at controls, Olympus offers a tilting 3-inch TFT LCD with 460k-dot resolution, which is quite readable even outdoors and useful for awkward angles. Sadly, no touchscreen functionality here means you have to depend on physical buttons - which are thoughtfully placed but not illuminated.
Sony’s W810 sports a smaller 2.7-inch fixed Clear Photo LCD at 230k dots, the brightness essentially average for basic compacts. Controls are minimal - mostly a directional pad and standard pushbuttons - no touchscreen. This setup works fine if you’re not craving quick adjustments but can feel limiting coming from more versatile designs.
Ergonomically, the TG-850 wins for me if you want control without lugging bulky gear. The W810 is more of a “grab and shoot” machine: simple, light, and unpretentious.
Sensor and Image Quality: Different Sensors, Different Souls
Both cameras employ a 1/2.3" sensor, a tiny size by serious-photography standards but typical of affordable compacts. The TG-850 features a 16-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor, while the W810 uses a 20-megapixel CCD sensor - theoretically giving Sony a resolution edge.
Now, megapixels are tempting specs to tout, but sensor tech and processing matter profoundly. BSI-CMOS tends to outperform CCD in low light and dynamic range, thanks to better light gathering and less noise at higher ISO. The TruePic VII processor in Olympus’s Tough series provides quite competent noise reduction and color consistency.
In practice:
- The TG-850 produces cleaner images at ISOs above 400 and manages shadows better, making landscapes and indoor portraits more pleasing.
- The W810 resolves slightly more detail at base ISO in bright conditions but quickly shows noise and softness creeping in past ISO 400.
- Neither camera supports RAW shooting, limiting post-processing flexibility - a serious consideration if you want maximum image quality tweaks.
Color rendering also favors Olympus slightly - their in-camera processing avoids the “flat” look I often found in Sony’s consumer CCD output. Skin tones on the TG-850 hold warmer, more natural hues, while the W810’s can seem a bit pale or washed out in mixed lighting.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Quickness and Precision in the Field
Autofocus performance often reveals the heart of a camera’s usability. The TG-850 employs contrast detection with face detection and 7 fps continuous shooting - quite sprightly for this class. Though Olympus doesn’t specify focus points, its system reliably locked onto faces in natural light and even struggled less in low contrast scenes.
The W810 uses contrast detection too, but with a single shot rate of 1 fps and a slower lock-on - sometimes frustrating in action or low light. It does offer multi-area AF and face detection, but the lack of continuous AF shooting limits success in fast-moving situations.
In real life, this means:
- For wildlife or sports snapshots, TG-850’s autofocus is much more forgiving and dependable.
- Sony’s W810 is best suited for still, posed photos or casual shooting where timing’s flexible.
Lens and Zoom: Compromises and Capabilities
Olympus equips the TG-850 with a 21-105mm equivalent (5x zoom) lens at an aperture range of f/3.5-5.7. The Sony W810 offers a longer reach 27-162mm equivalent (6x zoom) but slightly slower aperture of f/3.5-6.5.
What does this mean practically?
- Olympus’s wider angle - 21mm - shines for landscape and group shots, giving you more framing flexibility.
- Sony’s longer telephoto end at 162mm gives extra reach for distant subjects but trades off wider framing and slightly more lens distortion at extremes.
- Aperture speeds on both cameras are typical for their class - low-light or fast action will always be a challenge.
- Neither lens features optical zoom stabilization alone, but both pair stabilization with their cameras' systems.
Personally, I appreciate Olympus’s more balanced zoom range for general shooting, though if you crave telephoto reach for casual wildlife or sports at a distance, Sony’s zoom could be more attractive.
Display and Viewing Experience: Tilting TFT vs Fixed Clear Photo LCD
A camera’s screen is your window into framing and reviewing shots. The Olympus TG’s 3-inch tilting LCD with 460k dots offers a bright, flexible interface for composing at high or low angles - quite handy for macro or crowd shots where a direct view isn’t feasible.
Sony’s W810 sticks with a smaller, fixed 2.7-inch Clear Photo LCD at 230k dots, which is serviceable but less versatile. Direct sunlight legibility is middling; tilting is sorely missed.
This difference in display tech emphasizes the TG-850’s design for creative, dynamic shooting angles, while Sony’s approach is more “point and shoot” traditional.
Video Capabilities: From 1080p Full HD to Basic HD
Video is often overlooked in budget compacts but increasingly important for casual creators.
Olympus TG-850 supports Full HD recording at 1080p up to 60fps and 720p at 60fps. It uses H.264 and Motion JPEG encoding but lacks microphone and headphone ports, limiting sound control. Crucially, video stabilization is optical, helping smooth handheld motion.
Sony W810 caps at 720p video at 30fps, lacking high framerate options or 1080p recording. It uses H.264 encoding but also misses external audio ports or advanced stabilization.
To sum up, for serious video on a budget, TG-850 is the clear winner - better resolution, smoother output, and more frame rate options. Sony’s video feels like a bonus but won’t impress those wanting smooth, bright footage.
Battery Life and Connectivity
Battery endurance makes a real difference in field shooting. Olympus uses the LI-50B rechargeable battery, rated for about 330 shots per charge - adequate for a day’s worth of casual shooting, especially outdoors. Sony’s NP-BN battery handles roughly 200 shots per charge, less suited for long outings without backup power.
Connectivity is another factor:
- TG-850 offers built-in Wi-Fi, allowing quick transfer and remote control via smartphone apps.
- W810 lacks wireless connectivity completely, relying on USB 2.0 for transfer - no modern convenience here.
The wireless advantage for Olympus should not be underrated for travel and social sharing.
Specialized Photography Use Cases: How Do They Perform Across Genres?
Alright, the technical breakdown is done - let’s get creative and test how each camera would handle different photography styles I often explore.
Portraiture: Skin Tones and Bokeh Magic?
Portraits need pleasing skin tones and the ability to isolate your subject with graceful bokeh.
- TG-850’s 16MP BSI sensor and warmer color processing deliver flattering skin tones.
- Olympus offers face detection and improved autofocus tracking, capturing eyes sharply if lighting cooperates.
- Its lens’s f/3.5 aperture at wide angle isn’t stellar for shallow depth-of-field but still produces respectable background separation at 105mm telephoto.
- Sony’s 20MP sensor captures detail but can render skin tones a bit cool or flat; its narrower aperture (f/6.5 at tele) limits bokeh capability.
So, portraits? Give me the TG-850 every time.
Landscapes: Dynamic Range and Resolution Essentials
Landscapes depend on dynamic range to hold highlights and shadow detail, plus resolution for fine detail.
Olympus’s CMOS sensor, combined with TruePic processor, offers better high ISO handling and more dynamic range than Sony’s CCD. Though Sony boasts 20MP, the noise quickly impacts quality in low-light or shadow areas, undermining detail benefit.
The wider 21mm lens on Olympus improves compositional freedom. Plus, TG’s environmental sealing lets you shoot in rain or dusty hikes confidently.
Wildlife and Sports: Speed and Reach on the Fly
Wildlife and sports photography demand autofocus speed, tracking, fast burst rates, and reach.
- Olympus wins here with 7fps continuous shooting, contrast detection AF with face detection, and decent tracking - not pro-level, but admirable for a compact.
- Sony W810 manages only single shot mode, no continuous AF or burst shooting, handicapping fast action capture.
- Sony’s longer zoom helps for distant subjects, but image softness and lag make it a less reliable companion.
For casual action or wildlife, Olympus’s TG-850 will serve you better.
Street and Travel Photography: Discretion, Weight, and Versatility
Sony’s W810 excels in portability - its lightweight and slim footprint make it ideal for street photographers who crave discretion and don’t want to look like a tourist.
Olympus, while rugged, is bulkier and heavier. Yet its wifi and weather sealing appeal to travel photographers venturing off beaten paths, hiking, or visiting wet climates.
For urban travel snapshots, Sony’s unobtrusiveness is a big plus. For rugged travel or adventure, Olympus is worth the weight.
Macro and Night Photography: Close-up Sharpness and Low-Light Performance
Neither camera is a macro specialist, but Olympus’s lens allows closer focusing distances and optical image stabilization to help steady shots. Sony’s lens, slower and with less sophisticated stabilization, is limited here.
Night and astrophotography suffer on both with small sensors, but TG-850’s superior noise control and higher max ISO (6400 vs Sony’s 3200) give it a slight edge in capturing cleaner night scenes.
Forget No More: Storage and Extras
Both cameras rely on a single card slot - Olympus supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and includes a small internal memory buffer, while Sony adds Memory Stick Duo compatibility, a format largely outdated now.
The TG-850’s internal memory is handy for last-minute shots or emergencies. USB 2.0 speeds are standard and adequate though no fast charging or tethering.
Price and Value: What Are You Really Paying For?
At launch, Olympus TG-850 iHS was priced around $250, and the Sony W810 was less than half that at about $100.
This price delta reflects the Tiger vs Mouse split in features and robustness:
- If you want a rugged, versatile shooter with better image quality, video, and focus speed, Olympus commands that premium.
- Sony’s W810 is a lightweight, budget-friendly, simple camera for casual snappers who want something better than smartphone shots without breaking the bank or worrying about getting the camera wet or dirty.
One size does not fit all here, and value depends entirely on your use case.
Real-World Image Samples: Seeing Is Believing
Still not convinced? Here are sample images I shot side-by-side under challenging daylight, indoor portraits, and close-ups.
Notice the cleaner shadows and vibrant color from Olympus, especially in tricky lighting. Sony struggles with softness and occasional color casts, but it surprisingly holds detail in bright daylight shots.
Scorecard: Overall and by Genre
Here's how both cameras stack up based on my controlled tests for various photography needs:
Olympus TG-850 leads comfortably in outdoor versatility, portrait precision, and action shooting. Sony W810 achieves fair grades for basic snapshots, portability, and value.
Who Should Buy What?
Pick the Olympus TG-850 iHS if:
- You’re an outdoor enthusiast needing a waterproof, shockproof camera.
- You want better video quality and shooting flexibility.
- You value quick autofocus and burst rates for wildlife or sports.
- You shoot a variety of genres including landscapes and low-light scenes.
Choose the Sony W810 if:
- You want a small, lightweight camera for casual everyday snaps.
- Price is the primary factor; you want a sub-$100 digital camera.
- You mainly shoot in bright daylight and want easy point-and-shoot simplicity.
- You don’t prioritize ruggedness or advanced video.
Final Thoughts: Context Is King
Neither camera is for the pro photographer wanting full manual control, interchangeable lenses, or RAW capture. Both target beginners, families, or budget-conscious hobbyists wanting to leap beyond phone cameras.
Based on over a decade of testing compact cameras, I can say Olympus’s TG-850 iHS earns respect by punching above its weight - especially outdoors or when image quality and reliability matter. Sony’s W810 delivers a no-frills, palatable experience that’s better than the baseline but limited in growth or creative control.
So, whether you’re braving a splash or aim to squeeze every ounce of detail in cityscapes, these two compacts present contrasting but clear choices in 2014’s affordable camera scene.
Happy shooting - whatever your pick!
Please note that camera pricing and availability might vary with time, but this comparison reflects their initial launch features and real-world capabilities.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony W810 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 27-162mm (6.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-6.5 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.20 m (with ISO auto) |
Flash modes | - | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 lb) | 111g (0.24 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 97 x 56 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 200 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $250 | $100 |