Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZR1
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40


94 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZR1: A Hands-On Comparison for Every Kind of Photographer
Choosing your next camera is an exciting step in your photography journey - whether you’re upgrading your gear or diving deeper into creative capture. The Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 are two compact cameras from the pre-mirrorless era that cater to different types of photographers. Today, we’ll explore every major aspect of these cameras side-by-side, so you get a clear understanding of which is best suited for your distinct needs and style.
Drawing from extensive hands-on testing, field experience, and technical expertise, this article unveils real-world performance and nuanced insights that only long-term camera testing can provide. So, grab a coffee and let’s get started - this deep comparison covers everything from sensor tech to ergonomics, autofocus to video capabilities, and recommended use cases across popular photography genres.
Size, Ergonomics, and Build - How They Feel in Your Hands
The first thing you notice about a camera is how it feels and fits into your workflow. Both cameras are compact but were designed for different core purposes.
Feature | Olympus TG-860 | Panasonic ZR1 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 110 x 64 x 28 | 98 x 55 x 26 |
Weight (g) | 224 | 158 |
Body Type | Ultracompact, rugged waterproof | Compact, sleek but not weather sealed |
Environmental Seal | Waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof, crushproof | None |
Screen | 3”, 460k-dot, tilting | 2.7”, 230k-dot, fixed |
Olympus TG-860 highlights: The TG-860 is a rugged, waterproof camera designed for tough conditions. Its size and weight are larger because it incorporates protective weather sealing - essential for adventurers, underwater shooters, and anyone needing a “grab-and-go” camera for extreme environments. The tilting 3” screen gives you flexible framing options for tricky angles.
Panasonic ZR1 highlights: The ZR1 is smaller and lighter, aiming for portability and ease of use in everyday scenarios like street and travel photography where discretion and compactness matter. However, it lacks any weather sealing, so caution is needed in adverse conditions.
Our take: If you need durability and flexibility outdoors, TG-860’s rugged body is unmatched in this comparison. If size and pocketability top your list, Panasonic’s ZR1 wins on ease of carry, especially in urban settings.
Sensor and Image Quality - What Captures Your Vision
Image quality fundamentally depends on the sensor, lens, and processing engine. Here’s how these cameras stack up.
Spec | Olympus TG-860 | Panasonic ZR1 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
Megapixels | 16 | 12 |
Maximum Resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Native ISO Range | 125–6400 | 80–6400 |
Antialias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
RAW Support | No | No |
Aspect Ratios | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 |
Sensor Technology: The Olympus TG-860 employs a CMOS sensor, which traditionally offers faster readout speeds and better low-light performance than Panasonic’s CCD sensor in the ZR1. CMOS sensors tend to have improved noise management and dynamic range, especially evident at higher ISOs and in tricky lighting.
Resolution Advantage: Olympus has an edge with 16MP compared to Panasonic’s 12MP. This higher pixel count allows for sharper images and larger prints without sacrificing detail - consider this if cropping or large-format printing is in your workflow.
ISO Performance: Both cameras support up to ISO 6400, but the TG-860's CMOS sensor and newer TruePic VII processor deliver better noise control and cleaner files at elevated ISOs.
Real-World Observation: In daylight, both produce crisp photos with vibrant colors, but Olympus holds up better in indoor or shadowed scenes, with less grain and better exposure handling. Still, neither camera supports RAW format, limiting post-processing flexibility.
Lens and Optics - Zoom Range and Versatility
The fixed lenses define your framing options, with optical quality critical to sharpness and aberration control.
Lens Feature | Olympus TG-860 | Panasonic ZR1 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length | 21-105mm (5x optical zoom) | 25-200mm (8x optical zoom) |
Aperture Range | f/3.5–5.7 | f/3.3–5.9 |
Macro Minimum Focus | 1 cm | 3 cm |
Image Stabilization | Optical (yes) | Optical (yes) |
Olympus Lens Takeaway: The TG-860’s 5x zoom is shorter but features a very close minimum focusing distance of 1 cm, perfect for macro shots, capturing small subjects with excellent detail. Its optical stabilization helps reduce blur in low light and zoom shots.
Panasonic Lens Takeaway: ZR1 offers a longer zoom reaching a telephoto 200mm equivalent, better suited for distant subjects like wildlife or candid portraits from far away. Nonetheless, the 3 cm macro distance is less versatile for extreme close-ups.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed - Capturing the Moment
The autofocus capabilities are pivotal to reliable capture, especially for fast-moving scenes or spontaneous shooting.
Camera | Olympus TG-860 | Panasonic ZR1 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast Detection | Contrast Detection |
Number of Focus Points | Not specified | 11 |
Face Detection | Yes | No |
Eye Detection | Yes | No |
Continuous AF | Yes | No |
Continuous Shooting | 7 fps | 2 fps |
Olympus AF Strengths: TG-860 uses contrast detection with continuous autofocus, supplemented by face and eye detection. This allows for tracking moving subjects more reliably and is beneficial for portrait and casual action photography. The 7 fps burst rate is competitive for a compact, letting you capture sequences smoothly.
Panasonic AF Limitations: The ZR1 has a slower 2 fps continuous shooting rate and no face or eye detection. Its autofocus is limited to single-shot, which requires pre-focusing or anticipatory timing for moving subjects.
Implications: TG-860’s autofocus and burst performance serve better for wildlife and sports beginners or those capturing kids and pets. If you mostly shoot still life or landscapes, the Panasonic’s AF will suffice but with more patience.
User Interface, Controls, and Display - How Intuitive Is the Operation?
Interface design impacts your speed and overall shooting enjoyment.
Feature | Olympus TG-860 | Panasonic ZR1 |
---|---|---|
Main Screen | 3”, 460k-dot, tilting | 2.7”, 230k-dot, fixed |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Top Controls | Decent physical buttons, no illuminated buttons | Basic controls with no illumination |
Viewfinder | None | None |
Wireless Connectivity | Wi-Fi, GPS integrated | None |
Ports | USB 2.0, HDMI | USB 2.0 only |
Olympus Interface: The TG-860’s tilting LCD is useful for composing from odd angles, such as low to the ground or overhead shots. Its integrated GPS and Wi-Fi enable geotagging and wireless image transfer - valuable for travel photographers who want to quickly share images.
Panasonic Interface: The ZR1 comes with a smaller fixed screen that limits screen positioning. It lacks wireless features and HDMI output, so transferring files involves standard USB or SD card readers.
User Experience: Olympus’s up-to-date connectivity and user-friendly live view interface enhance photographic workflows. However, neither camera offers manual exposure modes or touchscreen control, which limits creative control somewhat.
Video Capabilities - Shooting Beyond Still
Both cameras offer basic video recording but excel at very different levels.
Feature | Olympus TG-860 | Panasonic ZR1 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1080p at 60 fps (Full HD) | 720p at 30 fps (HD) |
Video Format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone Port | No | No |
Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Timelapse Recording | Yes | No |
Olympus TG-860 produces smooth 1080p Full HD video at 60 frames per second, ideal for recording action or casual vlogging. The built-in stabilization helps minimize shake during handheld video.
Panasonic ZR1 maxes out at 720p and slower frame rates, recording in Motion JPEG which results in larger file sizes and lower compression efficiency.
If video is part of your creative toolkit, TG-860’s specs and features give it a clear advantage for casual to intermediate video shooters.
Battery Life and Storage - Ready for a Day of Shooting?
Shooting longevity and storage flexibility are essential, especially while traveling.
Feature | Olympus TG-860 | Panasonic ZR1 |
---|---|---|
Battery Life (CIPA) | Approx. 300 shots | Not specified |
Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal memory | SD/SDHC, internal memory |
Slots | Single slot | Single slot |
Olympus’s stated 300-shot battery life is average for compact cameras - enough for a day’s session with some conservation. The Panasonic ZR1’s battery rating is not officially listed but older small compacts typically yield similar numbers.
Olympus’s support for SDXC cards means you can use very large capacity cards, great for long trips or video. Both cameras have only one card slot - maintain multiple cards to cover your needs.
Specialty Photography: Who Shines Where?
Let’s match each camera’s capabilities against popular photography genres:
Genre | Olympus TG-860 | Panasonic ZR1 |
---|---|---|
Portraits | Strong: face & eye detect, solid AF, natural skin tones | Moderate: no face detection, less accurate AF |
Landscapes | Good: higher resolution, weather sealing, better dynamic range | Adequate: lower resolution, no weather sealing |
Wildlife | Useful: faster burst, continuous AF, optimum telephoto range limited | Zoom reach longer but AF slow, burst slow |
Sports | Serviceable: best burst in this comparison, continuous AF | Limited due to slow shooting rate, no continuous AF |
Street | Bulkier and rugged, less discreet | Compact, lightweight and unobtrusive |
Macro | Exceptional: 1cm focus, robust stabilization | Decent: 3cm focus is good but less versatile |
Night/Astro | Better ISO performance overall | Noise levels higher, ISO performance weaker |
Video | Superior: Full HD 60p, stabilization, timelapse | Limited: HD 720p, lower frame rate |
Travel | Rugged, versatile, GPS, Wi-Fi, longer zoom (moderate) | More lightweight, longer zoom, but no sealing |
Professional Use | Limited by lack of RAW, but reliable rugged tool | Less suited, no advanced features included |
Reliability, Build Quality and Workflow Integration
For professional or semi-professional photographers, build quality and workflow integration are important.
-
Olympus TG-860: Its crushproof, shockproof, freezeproof, and waterproof design is highly reliable under demanding conditions. While it lacks RAW capture and advanced manual controls, it has GPS for automated image data, Wi-Fi for quick transfers, and HDMI output for live broadcasting or review on larger screens.
-
Panasonic ZR1: Geared towards casual shooters, build quality is decent but does not offer environmental protection. Workflow integration is minimal with no wireless features and limited video capability, restricting its use in professional settings.
Price to Performance - What Value Do You Get?
Both cameras launched at similar prices (~$279), but their market positions differ sharply.
-
Olympus TG-860 offers ruggedness and versatility, justifying its slightly higher price with features appealing to outdoor enthusiasts and travelers looking for durability.
-
Panasonic ZR1 targets budget-conscious compact users needing a longer zoom and portable size but without specialized features for tough environments.
Given prices have dropped as these cameras age, the Olympus TG-860’s unique rugged abilities and enhanced image/video specs provide more bang for your buck in niche applications.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
Camera | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|
Olympus TG-860 | Rugged, waterproof, versatile zoom, good sensor, fast AF, video 1080p 60p, GPS, Wi-Fi, macro focus 1cm | Bulkier, no RAW support, no touchscreen, limited manual control |
Panasonic ZR1 | Compact, lightweight, longer zoom reach, adequate image quality for daylight | No weather sealing, limited video, slow AF, no face detection, poorer low light quality |
Recommendations Tailored to Your Needs
-
Outdoor Adventurers and Extreme Sports Photographers: You’ll appreciate the TG-860’s ruggedness, sharp 16MP sensor, fast continuous AF, and 1080p video at 60 fps. Take it anywhere without worry.
-
Casual Street and Travel Shooters: Panasonic ZR1’s small size and unassuming design suit street and travel shooters prioritizing portability and long zoom but working mostly in daylight conditions.
-
Macro Photographers: The TG-860’s 1cm macro focusing and stabilization are game changers for close-up work on insects, flowers, or fine details.
-
Video Enthusiasts: Olympus TG-860 is the clear winner with Full HD at 60 fps and timelapse capabilities.
-
Budget-Conscious Beginners: Panasonic ZR1 can be a good introduction if you mostly want point-and-shoot ease and don’t prioritize advanced features.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Both cameras have unique selling points rooted in their design philosophy and user base. Your choice hinges on your photography style and environment.
-
If you want a durable, feature-rich mid-compact that thrives outdoors, the Olympus TG-860 is an outstanding option that delivers value in image quality, ruggedness, and versatility.
-
If portability with a long zoom and simplicity wins for you - mainly urban photography or casual travel - the Panasonic ZR1 remains relevant but with limitations in autofocus speed and video.
Before buying, I recommend you try holding both cameras to see which fits your hands and shooting style better. Look for deals and consider accessories like extra batteries or protective cases, especially if you gravitate toward the Panasonic ZR1's compactness.
Explore one or both cameras in-depth; they can be enriching tools in your creative arsenal, offering enjoyable photo and video experiences at approachable prices. Your next memorable shot could be just the start - with either camera, the key is getting out there and capturing your world.
Happy shooting, and remember - the best camera is the one you have with you when inspiration strikes.
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $279 | $280 |