Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f84/67f84ba37112e0b724a4e30ca9f4099db427b4f9" alt="Samsung GX-1S front Samsung GX-1S front"
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung GX-1S, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The TG-870 was unveiled 10 years later than the GX-1S and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-870 scores vs the GX-1S with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Samsung GX-1S. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Samsung GX-1S
TG-870 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | ![]() | January 2006 | More recent by 122 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 210k | Clearer screen (+711k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus TG-870
GX-1S | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung GX-1S
TG-870 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 features outer dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung GX-1S in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-870 vs the GX-1S.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4860/c486039fc85cf67b7b4ebeab99f40265c71d7cab" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and GX-1S is 91 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/650ec/650ec27454b7345fc99a01c4fe8afa35a43c38c4" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The visual here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and GX-1S.
All in all, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-870 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-870 will render greater detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern TG-870 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da6fa/da6fae30130aa7f99ce9c40c6f15d96ae90150a7" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cdf1/3cdf1a2016603b0c0d2d8de787b035f37dc068b4" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung GX-1S |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2016-01-06 | 2006-01-16 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 6MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 605g (1.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $280 | $850 |