Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL240
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Superseded the Olympus TG-860
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly similar and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsThe TG-870 was manufactured 6 years after the TL240 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TG-870 grades against the TL240 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Samsung TL240. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Samsung TL240
| TG-870 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 74 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Olympus TG-870
| TL240 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung TL240
| TG-870 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-870 features physical measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the TG-870 and the TL240.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and TL240 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The pic here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and TL240.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to offer you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Portrait photography features
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography features
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Street photography features
Samsung TL240 Street photography features
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
environment sealing
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than average in class (221 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports focus by touch
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (160 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Sports photography highlights
Samsung TL240 Sports photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
better than average battery (300 per charge)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-870
Travel photography with Samsung TL240
better than average battery (300 CIPA)
environment sealing
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (21mm)
more heavy than average in class (221g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
supports focus by touch
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (160g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-870 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Landscape photography camera
rather wide (21mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
better than average battery (300 shots)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-870
Vlogging with Samsung TL240
rather wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than average in class (221 grams)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (160 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST5000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2016-01-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $280 | $171 |
