Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-330
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-330, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-10 was launched 2 years later than the VR-330 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-10 scores vs the VR-330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus VR-330
| XZ-10 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2011 | More recent by 25 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus XZ-10
| VR-330 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Olympus VR-330
| XZ-10 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-10 vs the VR-330.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and VR-330 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specs. The visual below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and VR-330.
All in all, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-330 to give greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger XZ-10 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $428 | $220 |