Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS200
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-10 versus Panasonic ZS200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") possess different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-10 was introduced 6 years before the ZS200 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the ZS200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Panasonic ZS200
XZ-10 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus XZ-10
ZS200 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | January 2013 | Fresher by 61 months | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 920k | Crisper display (+320k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic ZS200
XZ-10 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-10 versus Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the XZ-10 against the ZS200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and ZS200 is 91 and 86 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The graphic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and ZS200.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-10 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Panasonic ZS200 will provide greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older XZ-10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 340g (0.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 370 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $428 | $800 |