Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax X-5
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax X-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Released August 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax X-5: Which Compact Camera Deserves Your Attention?
Choosing the right camera can be daunting - especially when faced with two intriguing compact options like the Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and the Pentax X-5. Both aim to bridge the gap between easy portability and advanced features, but they fulfill different roles. After hands-on testing with each, we’re here to guide you through every nuance - from sensor capabilities to real-world handling, so you can confidently pick the perfect fit for your photographic journey.

An upfront look at the size and ergonomics contrast: The sleek Olympus XZ-10 is notably more compact and pocketable compared to the chunkier, bridge-style Pentax X-5.
First Impressions: Design, Build, and Handling
Before diving deep into specs, how a camera feels and operates day-to-day can greatly influence your creative process.
Olympus XZ-10: Compact Elegance with User-Friendly Controls
-
Body & Size: The XZ-10 is a compact small sensor camera designed to slip easily into your pocket or bag. At 221 grams, it strikes a nice balance of sturdiness without bulk.
-
Control Layout: It incorporates conventional dials and buttons with an intuitive touchscreen interface on its 3-inch, 920k-dot fixed screen, helping you adjust settings swiftly.
-
Ergonomics: Thanks to its smaller size, it’s ideal for street photography and casual shooting, letting you stay unobtrusive and spontaneous.
-
No Viewfinder: It lacks any optical or electronic viewfinder; you'll rely entirely on the screen - a compromise for a pocketable format.
Pentax X-5: Bridge Camera Brute Force with Versatile Features
-
Body & Size: The X-5 is a superzoom bridge camera. Its SLR-like body is bulkier (595 grams) and designed for a firm grip, with plenty of dedicated controls.
-
Control Layout: Without a touchscreen, the interface relies on physical buttons and a tilting 3-inch LCD at 460k dots. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) offers 230k dots, ideal in bright conditions.
-
Ergonomics: Due to its size and weight, it’s more suitable for controlled shooting - wildlife, travel, or situations where zoom reach outweighs compactness.
-
Viewfinder Advantage: The inclusion of an EVF sets it apart for precise framing in bright daylight or active shooting scenarios.

A look at the top control layout: Olympus offers minimalistic dials, while Pentax leans towards more extensive physical controls suited for enthusiast shooters.
Sensor & Image Quality: Comparing the Heart of the Camera
Both cameras feature 1/2.3" BSI CMOS sensors, but they differ in resolution and nuances affecting image rendering.
| Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
| Effective Resolution | 12 Megapixels | 16 Megapixels |
| Max Native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| RAW Support | Yes | No |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Maximum Image Resolution | 3968 x 2976 pixels | 4608 x 3456 pixels |
What This Means Practically
-
Resolution Edge: Pentax X-5’s higher 16MP count theoretically delivers more detailed images and better cropping flexibility. However, the high pixel density on the small sensor may increase noise in low-light conditions.
-
RAW Advantage: Olympus’s RAW support gives you greater post-processing latitude to fine-tune exposure, white balance, and noise reduction - a boon for enthusiasts seeking creative control.
-
Sensor Similarities: Both leverage backside illumination (BSI) which enhances light-gathering ability, crucial for low-light shooting.
-
Dynamic Range & Noise: Without DxOMark scores to compare, picture quality evaluation rests on practical testing. The XZ-10’s sensor tends to produce crisper low-light shots with less noise at higher ISOs due to less aggressive pixel packing.

The sensor dimensions and specs reveal that while both have similar sizes, the Pentax packs more megapixels into roughly the same sensor area.
Autofocus & Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy Under the Lens
For action, portraits, or wildlife, autofocus (AF) performance defines your success in capturing decisive moments.
| Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast-detection with Face Detection | Contrast-detection with Face Detection |
| Number of Focus Points | 35 | 9 |
| Continuous AF | No | No |
| AF Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Burst Shooting FPS | 5 frames per second | 10 frames per second |
| AF Live View | No | Yes |
What We Found
-
Speed: Pentax’s faster 10fps burst rate paired with electronic viewfinder support gives it an edge for fast action like sports or wildlife bursts.
-
Focus Points: The Olympus offers a greater number of AF points (35 vs 9), which helps with more precise focusing across the frame, especially beneficial in portraits or macro where selective focus is key.
-
AF Tracking: Both provide tracking but lack true continuous autofocus, meaning they are best suited for subjects with predictable movement.
-
Live View AF: X-5’s live view supports autofocus, while XZ-10 does not, enhancing the Pentax’s flexibility for framing and focusing via the screen.
Practical Shooting Notes
If you often shoot moving subjects like children or pets, Pentax’s burst rate and EVF advantage will be helpful. For portraits or controlled scenes, Olympus offers simpler precise AF targeting and RAW flexibility.
Lens and Zoom: Reach versus Brightness
Your lens defines framing, subject isolation, and creative possibilities.
| Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Type | Fixed, 5x Zoom | Fixed, 26x Superzoom |
| Focal Length (35mm Equivalent) | 26 – 130 mm | 22 – 580 mm |
| Max Aperture | f/1.8 (wide) - 2.7 (tele) | f/3.1 (wide) - 5.9 (tele) |
| Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | 1 cm |
| Stabilization Type | Sensor-Shift | Sensor-Shift |
| External Flash Support | Yes | No |
| Filters Diameter | Not specified (likely 37-46 mm) | Not specified |
What You Gain
-
Olympus XZ-10’s Bright Lens: A very bright f/1.8 at wide angle allows excellent low light capture and more natural background blur (bokeh) - ideal for portraits and artistic street shots.
-
Pentax X-5’s Superzoom: The massive 26x superzoom covering 22-580mm opens wildlife, sports, and travel photography doors where you can’t physically get close.
-
Aperture Tradeoff: Pentax’s narrower aperture at longer zooms limits bokeh and low-light performance.
-
Flash Usage: Only the Olympus supports external flashes, expanding creative lighting possibilities.
Real-World Lens Use
If crisp, professional-quality portraits or low-light shooting inspire you, Olympus’s brighter lens is compelling. If you prioritize ultimate zoom flexibility - say, for birdwatching or cityscapes - Pentax delivers.
Display & Viewfinder: Composing Your Shots
The ability to see and frame your shots comfortably plays a critical role in camera usability.
| Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Screen Type | Fixed Touchscreen LCD (3", 920k dots) | Tilting LCD (3", 460k dots) |
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic Viewfinder (230k dots) |
User Experience Insights
-
Olympus’s Bright, Detailed Touchscreen: Large dot count makes menus and live view vivid; touch capabilities speed up navigation and focusing.
-
Pentax’s Tilting LCD: Tilting helps with creative angles but lower resolution means less detailed previews.
-
Electronic Viewfinder: Pentax’s EVF affords shooting from eye-level, allowing steadier shots and better framing in bright sunlight.
In bright outdoor conditions or fast action, Pentax's EVF gives a solid advantage. For casual, leisurely shooting, Olympus’s touchscreen excels with its responsiveness.

Comparing rear displays: Olympus’s crisp touchscreen vs Pentax’s versatile tilting LCD paired with an EVF.
Battery Life & Storage: Staying Powered and Ready
Stamina is critical for travel or shooting days on end.
| Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Type | Proprietary Li-50B | 4 x AA batteries |
| Rated Battery Life | Approx. 240 shots (CIPA) | Approx. 330 shots (CIPA) |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (single slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (single slot) |
Notes on Practical Use
-
Battery Format: Olympus’s proprietary lithium-ion is compact but needs charging gear on the go.
-
Pentax’s AA Batteries: Easier to find replacements anywhere but adds weight/size and inconsistent performance based on battery quality.
-
Battery Life: Pentax’s higher count is decent, but 330 shots still requires carrying spares for heavy shooting days.
If battery convenience and reduced gear are priorities, Olympus edges out - especially for short trips or street sessions. Pentax benefits longer outings where AA batteries can be swapped quickly.
Video Capabilities: Capture More than Stills
Video is a must-have feature even for hybrid shooters or vloggers.
| Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | Full HD 1080p (30fps) | Full HD 1080p (30fps) |
| Other Resolutions | 720p at 30fps | 720p at 60fps and 480p |
| Video Format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Sensor-shift |
Observations
-
Format Quality: Olympus’s H.264 offers better compression and file size control compared to Pentax’s older Motion JPEG codec, which produces very large files.
-
Higher Frame Rate Option: Pentax’s 720p at 60fps caters to smooth slow-motion footage - nice for creative video effects.
-
No Audio Inputs: Neither camera offers external mic input - limiting audio quality control for serious vloggers.
-
Stabilization: Both provide sensor-shift IS to keep handheld video steady.
If you need versatile, higher-quality video in a compact form, Olympus wins. Pentax’s frame rate options are nice but hampered by bulky codec files.
Specialized Photography: How Do They Perform?
Let’s examine the cameras across major photography styles to see their real-world roles.
Portrait Photography
-
Olympus XZ-10: Wider aperture f/1.8 allows flattering background blur and better subject isolation. Face detection AF helps lock focus on eyes. The higher-res, crisp screen makes framing easy.
-
Pentax X-5: Long zoom is less helpful for tight headshots but versatile for environmental portraits. Aperture ceiling limits creative bokeh.
Verdict: Olympus best for portraits.
Landscape Photography
-
Olympus XZ-10: Good dynamic range; fixed screen limits hi/lo angle composing. Lacks weather sealing.
-
Pentax X-5: Zoom range great for framing distant details; tilting screen and EVF help composition. No weather resistance.
Verdict: Pentax favored for zooming landscape shots.
Wildlife Photography
-
Olympus XZ-10: Limited zoom reach makes distant wildlife challenging.
-
Pentax X-5: 580mm equivalent lens ideal for observing wildlife from afar; faster burst also helps.
Verdict: Pentax excels.
Sports Photography
-
Olympus XZ-10: 5 fps burst with good AF points ok for casual sports.
-
Pentax X-5: Twice the burst rate, EVF for tracking fast action.
Verdict: Pentax preferred for sports.
Street Photography
-
Olympus XZ-10: Small size, light weight, quick AF, and bright lens for discreet candid shots.
-
Pentax X-5: Heavy, more conspicuous; less practical.
Verdict: Olympus best for street.
Macro Photography
- Both offer close focusing (~1 cm), stabilized sensors, and face detection but Olympus’s brighter lens facilitates better background separation.
Recommendation: Tie, slight edge to Olympus.
Night & Astro Photography
-
Olympus’s brighter lens and RAW support assist capturing stars and night scenes better.
-
Pentax’s higher pixel count and tilting screen support versatile composition but noise may be higher.
Verdict: Olympus leads slightly.
Travel Photography
-
Olympus: Lightweight, pocketable, excellent walk-around lens.
-
Pentax: Bulkier, more versatile zoom covering all scenarios.
Recommendation: Choose Olympus for minimalism, Pentax for all-in-one reach.
Professional Use
- Neither camera is built for professional workflows but Olympus’s RAW and external flash support make it slightly more versatile for creative control.
Connectivity, Software, and Additional Features
| Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Compatible | Eye-Fi Compatible |
| HDMI | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| GPS | No | No |
| Self Timer | 2 or 12 seconds | 2 or 10 seconds |
Wireless support is limited to Eye-Fi cards in both cameras, a dated solution unlikely to satisfy modern wireless needs. HDMI output supports external monitors or playback.
Price and Value: What Does Your Dollar Buy?
| Camera | Approximate Price (USD) |
|---|---|
| Olympus XZ-10 | $428 |
| Pentax X-5 | $230 |
-
Olympus XZ-10 is nearly twice the price, justified by brighter lens, RAW shooting, and touchscreen usability.
-
Pentax X-5 appeals to budget-conscious buyers needing extensive zoom reach and faster burst.
Sample shots showcase Olympus’s superior low-light color and sharpness vs Pentax’s versatile focal length range.
Summary Scores and Final Thoughts
Overall, Olympus scores higher for image quality and portability, while Pentax shines in zoom versatility and burst speed.
Scored across genres: Olympus leads in portraits, night, macro; Pentax dominates wildlife, sports, and landscapes involving telephoto reach.
Who Should Buy the Olympus Stylus XZ-10?
-
You prioritize image quality with a bright lens, RAW capabilities, and touch screen control.
-
Your photography involves portraits, street, night, or macro.
-
You want a lightweight, pocketable camera for quick access and discreet shooting.
-
You don’t need extreme zoom but want artistic versatility.
Who Should Choose the Pentax X-5?
-
You need a generous superzoom for wildlife, travel, sports, and landscape telephoto shooting.
-
Burst shooting speed and electronic viewfinder aid active shooting.
-
Budget-conscious buyers seeking a capable all-rounder with telephoto reach.
-
You prefer a traditional control layout and don’t mind bulkier gear.
Final Recommendations
If your heart is on image quality, portability, and creative control - step into the Olympus XZ-10. Its bright f/1.8 lens, RAW files, and touch interface empower photographers chasing excellence in a compact package.
If you’re driven by reach, fast action capture, and a wide zoom versatile enough to cover everything from landscapes to wildlife, the Pentax X-5 is your toolkit on a budget - albeit with sacrifices in low-light prowess and portability.
Getting Started and Next Steps
Whichever you choose, we encourage hands-on testing to feel which camera syncs best with your style. Explore compatible lenses and accessories especially if you opt for Olympus’s external flash support or Pentax’s zoom extender modules.
Remember, the best camera is the one you’ll carry and use enthusiastically. Both these models offer unique strengths to fuel your photographic adventures.
Happy shooting!
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax X-5 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Pentax X-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Pentax X-5 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2012-08-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 22-580mm (26.4x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 230 thousand dots |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 9.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 595g (1.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $428 | $230 |