Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Released January 2013
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Below, we are comparing the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very similar but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The XZ-10 was revealed 17 months later than the GR Digital IV making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the XZ-10 grades vs the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 XZ-10 GR Digital IV 
RevealedJanuary 2013September 2011More recent by 17 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus XZ-10

 GR Digital IV XZ-10 
Display resolution1230k920kSharper display (+310k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 XZ-10 GR Digital IV 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 provides external dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the XZ-10 versus the GR Digital IV.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and GR Digital IV is 91 and 92 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and GR Digital IV.

Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-10 using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus XZ-10 will offer greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics much more aggressively. The younger XZ-10 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography features
45
focusing manually
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
41
has manual focus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-10
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (221 grams)
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Sports photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography details
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery life (390 per charge)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography information
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography information
60
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (221 grams)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
67
better than average battery life (390 per charge)
built-in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
53
focusing manually
relatively wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
missing Timelapse function
53
has manual focus
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (390 per charge)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging highlights
35
relatively wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (221g)
29
good max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2013-01-30 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.7 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 1 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 221 gr (0.49 pounds) 190 gr (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 photos 390 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at release $428 $599