Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-20
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-20, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-10 was unveiled 12 months earlier than the WG-20 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-10 grades against the WG-20 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh WG-20
| XZ-10 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Olympus XZ-10
| WG-20 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh WG-20
| XZ-10 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 offers exterior dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 versus the WG-20.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and WG-20 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and WG-20.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-20 to provide you with extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 164g (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | 260 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $428 | $370 |