Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Released January 2013
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XZ-10 was announced very close to the WB800F which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the XZ-10 grades against the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung WB800F

 XZ-10 WB800F 
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus XZ-10

 WB800F XZ-10 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB800F

 XZ-10 WB800F 
ReleasedJanuary 2013January 2013Similar generation
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the XZ-10 versus the WB800F.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Generally, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and WB800F.

As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to offer more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography info
45
manual focus
provides face detection focus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
43
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Street photography camera
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (221 grams)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (218g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (5.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
52
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography info
Samsung WB800F Travel photography info
60
flash built-in
quite wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (221 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
69
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography details
53
manual focus
quite wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no Timelapse function
49
you can focus manually
decently wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging advice
Samsung WB800F Vlogging advice
35
quite wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (221g)
35
decently wide (23mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB800F
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Samsung WB800F
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Samsung WB800F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2013-01-30 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 35 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.7 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 221 grams (0.49 lbs) 218 grams (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $428 $300