Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-310 and Olympus TG-630 iHS, both Waterproof digital cameras and both are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-310 was introduced 24 months before the TG-630 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-310 matches up against the TG-630 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| TG-310 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus TG-310
| TG-630 iHS | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 24 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| TG-310 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-310 enjoys outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-310 and Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-310 vs the TG-630 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-310 and TG-630 iHS is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The pic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and TG-630 iHS.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-310 to deliver more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-310 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-630 iHS Portrait photography highlights
good resolution (14 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
offers face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-310
Street photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competition (155 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography information
Olympus TG-630 iHS Sports photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery (150 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (220 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition (155g)
weather proof
good resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low battery (150 CIPA)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
weather proof
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
bad battery life (220 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-630 iHS Landscape photography features
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
weather proof
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
low battery (150 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse recording
pretty wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual exposure
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
bad battery life (220 shots)
no Timelapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
Vlogging with Olympus TG-630 iHS
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic socket
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
no external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $200 |