Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aea2e/aea2eaaf83f43ab5c09e1ef48ec446437cef3c4e" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 front"
93 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Announced November 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-310 versus Panasonic 3D1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the 3D1 (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-310 was introduced 10 months prior to the 3D1 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-310 scores versus the 3D1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Panasonic 3D1
TG-310 | 3D1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Olympus TG-310
3D1 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 10 months |
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic 3D1
TG-310 | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-310 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Panasonic 3D1 has proportions of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-310 versus Panasonic 3D1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-310 versus the 3D1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d917/1d917b209011f2ac2ed031c4eb0e4f2275f7e9da" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and 3D1 is 94 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b4c0/3b4c0f8b2a749dcc5873367be0fa84e045a955e8" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and 3D1.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-310 to resolve extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older TG-310 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/799d0/799d010078bb3359654be8340ff49a709917e124" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c452/6c452cac204adcc51f2e15bb480f01fa1b77ad9f" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
Olympus TG-310 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-310 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2011-11-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photos | 200 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $0 | $670 |