Samsung EX2F vs Samsung GX-1S: A Hands-On Comparison for the Discerning Photographer

Choosing the right camera can feel like navigating a labyrinth - especially when two options come from the same brand but belong to entirely different eras and photographic philosophies. Today, I’m putting the Samsung EX2F, a 2012 compact enthusiast camera, head-to-head against the Samsung GX-1S, a 2006 advanced DSLR. By drawing on my 15+ years of hands-on experience with cameras, plus detailed lab testing protocols and real-world shooting sessions, I’ll break down how they perform across key photographic disciplines and user scenarios.

Whether you’re a casual shooter eyeing something pocketable, a seasoned enthusiast torn between portability and optical control, or even a hybrid shooter contemplating legacy glass compatibility, this comparative review is tailored with you in mind. Let’s dive in.

Seeing Them Side by Side: Size, Feel, and Ergonomics

When I first placed the EX2F next to the GX-1S, the size difference was immediately apparent.

The EX2F is a compact marvel, weighing just under 300g and fitting comfortably in a coat pocket or small bag. Its dimensions (112x62x29 mm) make it perfect for travel photographers yearning for discretion. Meanwhile, the GX-1S, with its larger DSLR body measuring 125x93x66 mm and weighing a hefty 605g, offers a substantial grip and robust presence - typical of mid-size SLRs designed for an immersive shooting experience.

Ergonomically, the GX-1S feels commanding with dedicated dials and a textured grip, better suited for those who rely on physical controls during fast-paced shoots. The EX2F, while smaller, surprises with an articulate AMOLED screen and intuitive button layout, though it requires some acclimation for manual mode handling given its compact size.

These physical differences immediately hint at their core philosophies: portability vs tactile control.

A Tale of Two Screens: Viewing and Interface

In 2012, Samsung embraced OLED technology in the EX2F, packing it with a 3-inch, fully articulated AMOLED screen boasting vibrant colors and deep contrast. This flexibility made it ideal for shooting at odd angles, macro work, or self-portraits - a feature famously missing in so many contemporaries.

The GX-1S, meanwhile, sports a more traditional fixed 2.5-inch LCD with only 210k dots resolution, reflecting mid-2000s technology.

While the EX2F’s touchscreen scorecard was lacking (no touch), the OLED clarity and articulation gave it a distinct advantage in live view framing and playback. However, absence of live view autofocus in the GX-1S limits this DSLR for video and mirrorless-style operation, which may not matter to traditionalists who prefer the optical viewfinder experience.

I found the EX2F’s customizable menus more modern and user-friendly. The GX-1S, however, obeys a tried-and-true DSLR interface hierarchy. Both cameras have manual exposure modes and exposure compensation, but the EX2F lacks the dedicated physical controls that the GX-1S provides - a trade-off between ease of use and portability.

Under the Hood: Sensor Technology and Image Quality

Here’s where the story really splits.

The EX2F features a 1/1.7-inch BSI CMOS sensor measuring approximately 7.44x5.58mm with 12 megapixels. Backside-illuminated (BSI) design provides improved low-light sensitivity over earlier CMOS variants but runs into physical limits due to sensor size. The EX2F maxes out at ISO 3200 and offers optical image stabilization to combat camera shake in low light.

Conversely, the GX-1S houses a much larger APS-C sized CCD sensor at 23.5x15.7mm with 6 megapixels. Although the resolution is lower by today’s standards, the large sensor area (about 369 mm² compared to 41.5 mm² in the EX2F) allows for far superior light gathering, dynamic range, and depth-of-field control.

Having shot both in controlled test conditions, the GX-1S delivers richer tones, smoother gradations, and cleaner shadows - especially from ISO 200 (its base) through midrange speeds. The CCD sensor yields a distinct color rendition often adored by portrait and landscape photographers, albeit at the expense of higher noise floor at elevated ISOs.

The EX2F’s image quality is impressive for a compact, harnessing DXO’s color depth score of 20.0 bits and dynamic range around 11.5 EV, but it cannot match the APS-C sensor's more natural tonal rendering or detail retention.

Autofocus and Speed: Tracking and Precision in Action

Autofocus performance is a critical real-world factor, especially for sports, wildlife, and street photographers.

The EX2F uses contrast-detection autofocus, which is slower and less reliable in tracking moving subjects compared to phase detection systems found in DSLRs like the GX-1S. I noticed lag and occasional hunting in low contrast or dimly lit scenes on the EX2F, making it more suitable for deliberate composition than fast action.

The GX-1S’s 11 AF points and phase detection offer more precise subject acquisition and continuous focusing, crucial during sports or wildlife shoots. The 3 fps burst rate feels pedestrian today but was standard at the time and helps a bit with capturing moments in motion.

Neither camera offers eye or animal eye AF, which limits portrait-focused autofocus sophistication.

Lens Ecosystem and Versatility

One of the GX-1S’s strongest suits is compatibility with the Pentax KAF mount lens lineup, encompassing 151 lenses ranging from fast primes to super-telephoto zooms, including excellent macro and astro options.

The EX2F’s fixed 24–80mm f/1.4-2.7 lens covers a useful walk-around focal range with a spectacularly bright aperture at wide angle for a compact. But no interchangeable lenses mean you’re locked into this optical configuration, limiting versatility, although its fast aperture enables beautiful shallow depth-of-field and excellent low-light performance.

For photographers who prize tapping into diverse optics or specializing, the GX-1S is a clear winner. However, the EX2F offers a hassle-free, all-in-one package with decent zoom flexibility and excellent built-in image stabilization.

Built Quality and Environmental Suitability

Both cameras lack weather sealing or rugged protection, so neither is suited for harsh conditions without extra care. The EX2F is sleek but made largely of plastic composites, whereas the GX-1S feels more robust with a metal chassis typical of DSLRs of its generation.

Given their respective sizes, the GX-1S invites more deliberate, handheld shooting, while the EX2F is suited for on-the-go travel or street photographers looking to be discreet.

Battery, Storage, and Connectivity Conveniences

I appreciated the EX2F’s inclusion of built-in Wi-Fi, which in 2012 was uncommon and facilitates rapid image sharing and remote control via smartphones - very handy for travel bloggers and casual social shooters.

The GX-1S relies on outdated USB 1.0 and lacks HDMI or wireless connectivity, reflecting its pre-smartphone era design. However, its use of ubiquitous AA batteries can be practical in remote areas where recharging lithium-ion batteries isn’t feasible.

Versatility Across Photography Styles

Now let’s see how these cameras handle real-world photographic situations across diverse genres, informed both by lab tests and fieldwork:

Portrait Photography

The GX-1S’s APS-C sensor and broad Pentax lens ecosystem allow exquisite control over depth of field and pleasing skin tone rendering. The 6MP may sound low today, but its CCD sensor delivers creamy bokeh and excellent tonal gradation. In my portrait sessions, subjects’ eyes appeared expressive and sharp, especially using primes from the Pentax range.

The EX2F’s bright f/1.4 lens lets in lots of light, and its optical stabilization reduces blur in lower light portraits. However, small sensor size means more noise at higher ISOs and less background separation, producing a somewhat flatter aesthetic compared to GX-1S.

Neither camera supports eye detection autofocus, so manual focus finesse or careful AF point selection is needed for tack-sharp eyes.

Landscape Photography

Landscape shooters often demand wide dynamic range and high resolution.

The GX-1S’s APS-C sensor excels in dynamic range and depth of detail, capturing varied sky and shadow details without clipping harshly. The 3:2 native aspect ratio suits traditional panoramas.

The EX2F’s smaller sensor constrains dynamic range, but its sensor still registers solid 11.5 EV. The fast lens performs admirably in low light and twilight landscapes, but overall resolution and nuance lag behind.

For careful compositioners, the GX-1S’s larger sensor size trumps compact convenience, though the EX2F’s portability is tempting for spontaneous travel scenery.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Neither camera specializes in sports or wildlife capture, but I found the following:

• GX-1S’s 11 AF points, phase detection sensor, and 3 fps burst rate offer marginally improved tracking of moving animals or athletes compared to EX2F.
• EX2F’s contrast detection AF and slower shooting cadence make fast subjects challenging.
• GX-1S’s Pentax KAF mount opens access to high-quality telephotos, a meaningful advantage.

Hence, GX-1S is clearly preferable for wildlife or sports enthusiasts relying on DSLR-level optical performance.

Street Photography

EX2F shines here. Its compact size, fast lens, and silent operation (limited shutter noise) enable discreet candid captures. The bright AMOLED screen supports shooting in varied lighting angles common in street environments.

The GX-1S, bulkier and louder, draws more attention and requires more deliberate interaction, less suited for spontaneity.

Macro Photography

EX2F does not offer dedicated macro focusing range, but its lens allows decent close-ups, complemented by the articulated screen for framing low-angle shots.

The GX-1S benefits from lenses designed for macro with the Pentax mount, plus mechanical focusing control for precision.

Night and Astrophotography

The EX2F’s stabilized sensor and fast lens provide modest handheld low-light abilities up to ISO 3200.

However, the GX-1S, with its larger sensor and cleaner mid-ISO performance (ISO 200 base), yields lower noise and more detail for long exposures required in astro photography - though the lack of extended bulb and specialized astro modes is a limitation.

Video Capabilities

The EX2F offers full HD (1920 x 1080) video with H.264 compression - quite a bonus for a compact from 2012.

GX-1S has no video functionality.

For vloggers or hybrid shooters, EX2F is naturally preferred.

Travel Photography

From my travel shoots, the EX2F’s pocket size, Wi-Fi, movie features, and stabilized zoom lens make it a versatile, ultra-portable companion.

The GX-1S demands a larger bag, multiple lenses, and added weight, which may not suit casual travel but rewards enthusiasts willing to prioritize image quality and control.

Professional Use

The GX-1S fits a niche for professional upright pros using Pentax lenses in portrait or product photography at 6MP resolution, benefiting from RAW support and optical viewfinder.

The EX2F is best considered a high-end compact offering RAW files and manual controls but is less robust for professional workflows demanding autofocus speed, ruggedness, or extensive lens choices.

Overall Performance in Numbers

Let's look at an overview, combining DXO scores (where applicable), burst, AF, and feature sets.

(The EX2F obtains a DXO overall score of 48, respectable for a compact. The GX-1S was never tested by DXO but excels in sensor size and autofocus.)

How They Stack Up Across Photography Types

Breaking down performance by genre helps clarify suitability:

Sample Image Gallery: Real-World Look and Feel

Below are side-by-side samples highlighting the difference in color reproduction, noise, and sharpness.

Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F screen back Samsung GX 1S front Samsung GX 1S screen back

Look closely at skin tone smoothness and shadow detail - the GX-1S produces more nuanced transitions, while the EX2F often processes sharper but slightly punchier colors.

Top-Down Design and Controls

From above, the control layouts reveal how these cameras invite engagement.

The GX-1S’s dedicated dials for ISO, shutter speed, and aperture contrast sharply with the EX2F’s more compact but less tactile button cluster.

Final Takeaways and Recommendations

Samsung EX2F - Best For:

• Photography enthusiasts seeking advanced features in a compact, pocket-friendly form.
• Travel, street, and casual portrait shooters appreciating portability and fast lens speed.
• Hybrid shooters wanting HD video and wireless connectivity.
• Beginners or intermediates requiring simple, versatile operation with manual exposure controls.

Strengths: Compactness, fast aperture zoom, OLED articulated screen, built-in stabilization, video, Wi-Fi.

Weaknesses: Smaller sensor limits low-light and dynamic range, contrast AF lags in fast action, fixed lens.

Samsung GX-1S - Best For:

• Photographers prioritizing image quality and lens versatility over portability.
• Hobbyists or semi-pros invested in Pentax lens collection seeking DSLR experience.
• Portrait, landscape, and specialty photography requiring superior tonal gradation.
• Users comfortable with manual focusing and older tech interfaces willing to trade new features for optical quality.

Strengths: Large APS-C CCD sensor, phase-detection AF, interchangeable lens flexibility, robust handling.

Weaknesses: Bulkier body, limited burst and AF sophistication, no video or wireless features, dated LCD.

Closing Thoughts

I've always believed the best camera is the one that fits your style, workflow, and goals - not necessarily the newest or flashiest. The Samsung EX2F still shines as a brilliant compact capable of vivid, eye-catching images with serious manual controls and video options, ideal for photographers valuing convenience and versatility.

The Samsung GX-1S, though older and heavier, packs a sensor and system that can still serve dedicated image-makers who prioritize image quality and optical adaptability over modern conveniences.

If you want a pocketable companion for vibrant everyday photography and some video, the EX2F remains compelling today. But if ultimate image quality, lens choice, and a classic DSLR feel are your priority, and you don’t mind the size, GX-1S is a rewarding tool even in 2024.

Whichever you choose, you’ll be engaging with thoughtfully engineered cameras that reflect different decades' values and technology - offering unique photographic experiences well worth exploring.

For ongoing insights and camera recommendations, I test gear under real-world and lab conditions, always sharing transparent reviews to empower photographers at every level.