Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-3
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony NEX-C3, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is pretty close but the TG-310 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-310 was revealed 7 months prior to the NEX-C3 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-310 matches up versus the NEX-C3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony NEX-C3
TG-310 | NEX-C3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus TG-310
NEX-C3 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 7 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony NEX-C3
TG-310 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-310 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has specifications of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony NEX-C3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-310 vs the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/316ac/316ac0d30ee452b322a36e35eaf4a000e5f667a7" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-310 and NEX-C3 is 94 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b8fc/6b8fcfca4ad02ff477aa2d66a7b83eef3e8fd690" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The graphic below should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and NEX-C3.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-310 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony NEX-C3 will render more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older TG-310 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b77b/5b77b1881a9f569d814d59136f12712e5a5aeddc" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbcc3/fbcc3da88f1ecad62e33c21bf5923620dd34b9c9" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus TG-310 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-01-06 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 pictures | 400 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $343 |