Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS42
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Increase to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS42, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") posses different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-320 was announced 2 years later than the FS42 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the TG-320 scores versus the FS42 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic FS42
| TG-320 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | April 2009 | More recent by 34 months |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus TG-320
| FS42 | TG-320 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic FS42
| TG-320 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 has exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS42 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-320 vs the FS42.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and FS42 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The visual below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and FS42.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-320 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-320 will give greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent TG-320 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2009-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 132 gr (0.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $580 |