Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX700
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
94 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Panasonic FX700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX700 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX700, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the FX700 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-320 was launched 18 months after the FX700 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the TG-320 matches up against the FX700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Panasonic FX700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic FX700
| TG-320 | FX700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Olympus TG-320
| FX700 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic FX700
| TG-320 | FX700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic FX700 has specifications of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX700 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-320 versus the FX700.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and FX700 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through technical specs. The image here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and FX700.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of files though you need to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer TG-320 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-320
Portrait photography with Panasonic FX700
MP count good (14 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography info
Panasonic FX700 Street photography info
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition (155 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
Sports photography with Panasonic FX700
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FX700 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition (155g)
environment sealing
MP count good (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-320
Landscape photography with Panasonic FX700
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse function
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FX700 as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone jack
fairly wide (24mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2010-07-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 176 gr (0.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $399 |
