Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX75
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35


94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX70

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX75, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The TG-320 was introduced 20 months later than the FX75 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TG-320 scores versus the FX75 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic FX75
TG-320 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus TG-320
FX75 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic FX75
TG-320 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 provides physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has sizing of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX75 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-320 vs the FX75.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and FX75 is 94 and 94 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The graphic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and FX75.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution and you should expect similar quality of photographs but you will need to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent TG-320 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $139 |