Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front
Portability
85
Imaging
47
Features
47
Overall
47

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Panasonic GF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
  • Launched October 2009
  • Renewed by Panasonic GF2
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic GF1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the GF1 (12MP) is very similar but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and GF1 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The TG-320 was released 2 years later than the GF1 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-320 scores against the GF1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic GF1

 TG-320 GF1 
LaunchedJanuary 2012October 2009Fresher by 28 months

Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus TG-320

 GF1 TG-320 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic GF1

 TG-320 GF1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 has got outside dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic GF1 has proportions of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic GF1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 vs the GF1.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and GF1 is 94 and 85 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and GF1.

As you can tell, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus TG-320 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-320 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic GF1 Portrait photography highlights
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes face detection focusing
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
60
you can focus manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focus
exports RAW files
sensor resolution low (12MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic GF1 as a Street photography camera
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competitors (155 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
64
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Sports photography details
Panasonic GF1 Sports photography details
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proof
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low battery (150 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
44
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
great battery power (380 CIPA)
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
Travel photography with Panasonic GF1
67
lighter than competitors (155g)
weather proof
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low battery (150 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
59
great battery power (380 shots)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic GF1 as a Landscape photography camera
39
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
weather proof
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
low battery (150 shots)
lack of Time Lapse recording
60
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
great battery power (380 CIPA)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
Vlogging with Panasonic GF1
32
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (155g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic port
25
supports face detect focus
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic GF1
 Olympus TG-320Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus TG-320 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
Class Waterproof Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2012-01-10 2009-10-14
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Venus Engine HD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 23
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 -
Macro focus distance 3cm -
Total lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT Color LCD TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m 6.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD Lite
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 385 gr (0.85 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 54
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.2
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.3
DXO Low light score not tested 513
Other
Battery life 150 photographs 380 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/MMC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $400