Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic L10
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
66 Imaging
44 Features
38 Overall
41
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic L10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 556g - 135 x 96 x 78mm
- Announced December 2007
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic L10 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic L10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and L10 (10MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and L10 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-320 was introduced 4 years later than the L10 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic L10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the TG-320 scores against the L10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic L10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Panasonic L10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic L10
| TG-320 | L10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | December 2007 | Fresher by 50 months |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 207k | Clearer display (+23k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic L10 over the Olympus TG-320
| L10 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic L10
| TG-320 | L10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic L10 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 has got exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic L10 has measurements of 135mm x 96mm x 78mm (5.3" x 3.8" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 556 grams (1.23 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic L10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 vs the L10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and L10 is 94 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic L10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The graphic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and L10.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-320 will result in more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher TG-320 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic L10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic L10 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2007-12-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 3 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 207k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 11.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye Auto, On, Red-Eye On, Red-Eye Slow Sync, Off, Slow Sync (1&2) |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 556g (1.23 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 135 x 96 x 78mm (5.3" x 3.8" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 429 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | $350 |