Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-50
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
63 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched November 2013
- Previous Model is Pentax K-30
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-50 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-50, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the K-50 (16MP) is very comparable but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and K-50 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-320 was released 22 months before the K-50 making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-50 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-320 matches up against the K-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 and Pentax K-50. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Pentax K-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Pentax K-50
TG-320 | K-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-50 over the Olympus TG-320
K-50 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | January 2012 | Newer by 22 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax K-50
TG-320 | K-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Pentax K-50 has sizing of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") with a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-50 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 versus the K-50.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and K-50 is 94 and 63 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The image below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and K-50.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Pentax K-50 will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-50 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Pentax K-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Pentax K-50 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 51600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 650 grams (1.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1120 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photographs | 410 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $610 |