Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-70
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-80
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-70: The Ultimate Waterproof Compact Camera Showdown
When it comes to rugged, waterproof compact cameras tailored for adventurous photography, two models often come up for consideration: the Olympus TG-320, announced in 2012, and the more recent Ricoh WG-70, launched in early 2020. Both aim to serve photographers who want a durable, splash-ready companion for travel, outdoor sports, underwater shots, and more, but they come from different eras of camera technology with distinct strengths and trade-offs.
In this in-depth review and comparison article, we’ll dive into the technical specs, real-world performance, build quality, and photographic versatility of these two cameras. Whether you’re into macro photography of underwater critters, shooting vibrant landscapes, or just want a reliable waterproof camera for everyday use, we will guide you through which of these models fits your workflow and creative ambitions best.
Let’s begin by visually comparing their size and handling - a critical consideration when selecting gear you want to carry often.
Feel the Difference: Size and Ergonomics Compared
Compact cameras with rugged, waterproof builds need to strike a balance between ergonomics, portability, and durability. Let’s examine how the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-70 compare physically.
| Feature | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (WxHxD) | 96 x 63 x 23 mm | 123 x 62 x 30 mm |
| Weight | 155 g | 193 g |
| Body Type | Compact, waterproof | Compact, waterproof |
| Environmental Sealing | Waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, freezeproof | Waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, crushproof, freezeproof |

Observations:
- The Olympus TG-320 is noticeably smaller and lighter by almost 40 grams, making it easier to stash in a pocket or strap on for travel.
- The Ricoh WG-70 is bulkier, but the added size contributes to extra environmental robustness, including crushproof certification - something the TG-320 lacks.
- Both have sturdy builds designed to withstand harsh conditions, but the WG-70 offers more comprehensive protection for intensive outdoor use.
Ergonomics:
While you won’t find extensive manual control dials on either model, their button layouts and grip design affect ease of use in the field. The TG-320’s more compact form may appeal more to casual photographers, whereas the WG-70’s bulk can make it easier to hold steadily, especially with gloves on in cold weather.
Control Layouts and Interface Usability
Physical design is only part of the story. Let’s see how each camera’s controls facilitate or hinder quick operation.

- The TG-320 keeps things minimal, with essential buttons but no touch interface or illuminated keys. Its fixed 2.7-inch TFT LCD is limited in resolution (230k dots), but sufficient for framing.
- The WG-70 offers a similar screen size and resolution but adds more customizability in controls. Notably, it supports manual focus (more on that later) and has a more robust button set to accommodate advanced features like exposure bracketing.
- Both lack viewfinders - relying exclusively on the rear LCD for composition, which is common for waterproof compacts but requires care in bright sunlight.
You’ll appreciate the WG-70’s slightly upgraded interface for more control-driven shooting scenarios, yet if simplicity is your priority, the TG-320’s straightforward layout keeps distractions minimal.
The Sensor and Image Quality: Old Tech vs Newer Advances
At the heart of any camera is its sensor, critical for image quality, low light ability, and dynamic range.

| Specification | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS (Back-Side Illuminated CMOS) |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
| Megapixels | 14 MP | 16 MP |
| Native ISO Range | 80 – 1600 | 125 – 6400 |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/2000 sec | 1/4000 sec |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| RAW Support | No | No |
Sensor Technology Impact
- The TG-320 uses an older CCD sensor, which, while capable of producing good color and detail, is less efficient in low light and higher ISO settings.
- The WG-70’s BSI-CMOS sensor benefits from modern design, with improved light-gathering ability and higher maximum ISO (up to 6400 vs TG-320’s 1600). This results in cleaner images in dim environments and potentially better dynamic range.
Resolution and Detail
The WG-70 packs 16 megapixels, a modest increase over the TG-320’s 14 MP, but the difference is minor in practical detail. Still, the WG-70 output should exhibit finer image detail and improved texture rendition due to sensor innovations.
Shutter Speed Range
WG-70’s faster max shutter speed (1/4000 vs 1/2000 sec) lets you freeze very fast action or shoot wide-open in bright sun more easily, a boon for outdoor sports and wildlife photography.
Display and User Interface
Both cameras feature fixed, non-touch TFT LCDs with the same 2.7” diagonal and 230k pixel resolution.

- The TG-320’s LCD is basic but delivers accurate color for framing and review.
- The WG-70 enhances usability slightly thanks to its more modern image processing, but the screen specs remain similar.
- Neither supports articulating screens or touch control, which limits video shooting and awkward-angle compositions.
For users wanting a waterproof point-and-shoot with simple framing, both screens suffice, though the WG-70 offers a slightly cleaner, more responsive menu system.
Autofocus Performance and Focus Control
Autofocus capabilities differ significantly between these cameras, especially important for action, macro, and wildlife photography.
| Camera Feature | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus System Type | Contrast-detection AF | Contrast-detection AF |
| Number of Focus Points | Unknown, no dedicated points | 9 focus points |
| Face Detection AF | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous AF | No | Yes |
| Manual Focus | No | Yes |
| Macro Focus Distance | 3 cm | 1 cm |
Real-World AF Considerations
- The Ricoh WG-70’s continuous autofocus and manual focus options provide more control over subject sharpness, critical in macro (especially underwater) and fast-moving scenarios.
- The closer macro focusing distance (1 cm vs 3 cm) allows you to get dramatically closer to subjects, enhancing creative potential.
- The TG-320 features face detection but lacks continuous AF and manual focus, resulting in slower or less precise focusing in dynamic scenes.
If you want to experiment with manual focus for creative shots and rely on consistent tracking, the WG-70’s autofocus system is a clear advantage.
Photo and Video Capabilities: What Can You Capture?
Both cameras cater thoughtfully to casual photographers and adventurers but differ notably in video and photo modes.
| Feature | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Photo Resolution | 4288 x 3216 (14 MP) | 4608 x 3456 (16 MP) |
| Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps | 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps, 720p @ 120 fps |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Flash Modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, Off |
| Exposure Bracketing | No | Yes |
| White Balance Bracketing | Yes | No |
| Timelapse Recording | No | Yes |
Video Capability Insights
- The WG-70 records full HD 1080p video at 30fps, and even slow-motion 720p video at 120fps, enabling creative slow-motion capture. This is a standout feature for an outdoor compact camera.
- The TG-320 tops out at 720p HD resolution and 30fps, adequate but less versatile.
- Neither has microphone or headphone ports, limiting audio control.
Advanced Photo Features
The WG-70’s exposure bracketing enhances dynamic range capture, valuable for landscapes and HDR workflows, while TG-320 offers no such bracketing but supports white balance bracketing to manage tricky lighting.
Overall, the WG-70 is the stronger multimedia performer, appealing to hybrid shooters who want stills and video versatility.
Durability in the Field: Sealing and Toughness
Both cameras promise ruggedness with environmental sealing, but to differing degrees.
| Durability Feature | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Waterproof | Yes (up to 3 m / 10 ft) | Yes (up to 14 m / 46 ft) |
| Dustproof | Yes | Yes |
| Shockproof | Yes (1.5 m drop) | Yes (2 m drop) |
| Crushproof | No | Yes (100 kgf force) |
| Freezeproof | Yes (down to -10°C) | Yes (down to -10°C) |
The WG-70 is built to higher rugged standards, especially with its extreme depth waterproof rating and crushproof certification, thanks to stronger seals and reinforced construction. If you’re serious about diving, snorkeling, or industrial-strength adventures, it’s the safer bet.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery life and data management are vital for extended trips.
| Feature | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Type | Rechargeable Li-ion (LI-42B) | Rechargeable Li-ion |
| Approx. Shots per Charge | 150 | 300 |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (1 slot) | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC (1 slot) |
The WG-70 doubles the TG-320’s battery life rating, allowing for longer shooting before recharge. Its internal memory is a minor bonus, providing some buffer in case your card fills or is removed accidentally.
Connectivity: Sharing and Transfer Options
- The TG-320 lacks wireless connectivity.
- The WG-70 features wireless transmission capabilities, enabling easier photo sharing and remote control functions (though no Bluetooth or NFC).
For casual shooters who want quick file transfer to smartphones or tablets, the WG-70 presents a more modern approach, reflecting the evolving connectivity expectations of the past decade.
Lens Specifications and Optical Range
Both cameras have fixed zoom lenses tailored for flexible, everyday shooting.
| Specification | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length (35mm equivalent) | 28-102 mm (3.6x zoom) | 28-140 mm (5x zoom) |
| Maximum Aperture | f/3.5 – f/5.1 | f/3.5 – f/5.5 |
| Macro Capability | 3 cm minimum focusing | 1 cm minimum focusing |
The WG-70’s longer focal range lets you zoom further, beneficial for wildlife or sports snapshots when you can’t get too close to your subject. Its closer macro focusing distance enhances your ability to capture fine detail on insects or underwater flora.
Sample Images and Real-World Use Cases
Seeing the images these cameras produce in real-world use rounds out the assessment.
- The Olympus TG-320 delivers lifelike skin tones and decent outdoor color saturation but reveals some noise and softness in low light or underwater shots.
- The Ricoh WG-70 produces sharper, more detailed images with stronger color fidelity and better high ISO behavior, thanks to its BSI-CMOS sensor.
- Both struggle somewhat with fine bokeh due to small sensors and limited aperture, but the WG-70’s more advanced autofocus helps lock onto eyes for portraits.
- Landscape shots benefit from WG-70’s better dynamic range and exposure bracketing capability.
Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down how these cameras perform in your favorite photography disciplines.
| Genre | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-70 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Fair | Good | WG-70 better eye detection, color |
| Landscape | Fair | Good | WG-70 with bracketing & better DR |
| Wildlife | Poor | Fair | WG-70 longer zoom & continuous AF |
| Sports | Poor | Fair | WG-70 faster shutter & continuous AF |
| Street | Good | Good | TG-320 smaller & lighter |
| Macro | Fair | Good | WG-70 better focus & closer minimum distance |
| Night/Astro | Poor | Fair | WG-70 higher ISO, slower noise |
| Video | Basic HD | Full HD + slow-mo | WG-70 more versatile |
| Travel | Good | Good | TG-320 size vs WG-70 battery life |
| Professional Work | Limited | Limited | Neither replace dedicated pro gear |
Overall Performance and Ratings
A synthetic score helps summarize the above considerations.
- Ricoh WG-70 leads with improved sensor tech, higher resolution, more comprehensive ruggedness, and better video.
- Olympus TG-320 remains a champion of compactness and simplicity but shows its age in sensor and feature set.
Who Should Choose Which?
| User Type | Recommended Camera | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Casual hikers and beachgoers | Olympus TG-320 | Lightweight, waterproof, user-friendly |
| Underwater macro shooters | Ricoh WG-70 | Superior macro focus (1cm), crushproof durability |
| Adventure sports enthusiasts | Ricoh WG-70 | Faster shutter, longer zoom, video slow-mo |
| Budget-conscious buyers | Olympus TG-320 (used market) | Lower initial cost, simplicity |
| Vloggers and hybrid shooters | Ricoh WG-70 | Full HD video, slow-motion, wireless transfer |
Wrapping Up: Expert Recommendations
If you want a durable, versatile waterproof compact with modern sensor tech, superior macro and video performance, and excellent autofocus, the Ricoh WG-70 is the clear choice. Its long zoom range, improved battery life, and ruggedness make it a reliable tool for serious hobbyists and adventurers.
Conversely, the Olympus TG-320 caters to those prioritizing simplicity, compactness, and ease of use, ideal if your needs are modest, your budget tight, or you prefer a less complex interface.
Getting Started With Your Rugged Camera
Whichever camera aligns with your needs, consider investing in these accessories for an optimal experience:
- Extra SD cards (Class 10 or UHS-I recommended)
- Spare batteries or portable chargers for extended trips
- Waterproof cases or attachments for deeper dives beyond rated depths
- Lens cleaning kits to maintain optical clarity after outdoor use
Check out hands-on trials or rentals if possible - handling these sturdy compacts offers invaluable insight before committing.
The key to unlocking rewarding outdoor and underwater photos is pairing your camera choice with your creative vision and shooting scenarios. Both the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-70 open doors to adventure photography, each with its own flavor.
Feel free to explore sample images, detailed specs, and user reviews to deepen your understanding, and embrace the journey of creating stunning images in the wild!
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 300 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $0 | $280 |