Clicky

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
71
Imaging
53
Features
85
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Released October 2013
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M1 was revealed 11 months after the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M1 matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M1 XZ-2 iHS 
ReleasedOctober 2013December 2012More modern by 11 months
Screen resolution1037k920kCrisper screen (+117k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1

 XZ-2 iHS E-M1 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M1 XZ-2 iHS 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 has outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and XZ-2 iHS is 71 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and XZ-2 iHS.

As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 will result in greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Portrait photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography factors
71
has manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/320 seconds)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
46
focusing manually
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Street photography information
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography information
78
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
has focus by touch
weather proof
lighter than competitors (497 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
66
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
heavier than others (346g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Sports photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography highlights
70
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
weather proof
has phase detect AF
bad battery life (350 CIPA)
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
good battery (340 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Travel photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography info
65
lighter than competitors (497 grams)
weather proof
has focus by touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
bad battery life (350 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
61
good battery (340 per charge)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others (346 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Landscape photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography info
73
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
bad battery life (350 per charge)
55
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
good battery (340 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
does not have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
36
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has mic support
lighter than competitors (497g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
36
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has mic port
display isn't selfie friendly
heavier than others (346g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M1Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2013-10-28 2012-12-18
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePIC VII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 81 35
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of display Tilting Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/320 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 497 grams (1.10 pounds) 346 grams (0.76 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 49
DXO Color Depth score 23.0 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score 12.7 11.3
DXO Low light score 757 216
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 340 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $799 $450