Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 was revealed 11 months after the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M1 matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| E-M1 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2013 | December 2012 | More modern by 11 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1
| XZ-2 iHS | E-M1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| E-M1 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 has outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and XZ-2 iHS is 71 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 will result in greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-10-28 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePIC VII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 497 grams (1.10 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 73 | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | 757 | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 340 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $799 | $450 |