Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 was revealed 11 months after the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M1 matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| E-M1 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2013 | December 2012 | More modern by 11 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1
| XZ-2 iHS | E-M1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| E-M1 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 has outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and XZ-2 iHS is 71 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 will result in greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-10-28 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePIC VII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 497 grams (1.10 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 73 | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | 757 | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 340 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $799 | $450 |