Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1

Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
33
Overall
36
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-320 and Sony QX1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Lens-style by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The TG-320 was launched 3 years earlier than the QX1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the TG-320 matches up against the QX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony QX1

 TG-320 QX1 
Screen size2.7""Bigger screen (+2.7")
Screen resolution230k0kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus TG-320

 QX1 TG-320 
LaunchedSeptember 2014January 2012More modern by 32 months
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony QX1

 TG-320 QX1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 features external dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has specifications of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Compare the Olympus TG-320 and Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the TG-320 against the QX1.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and QX1 is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and QX1.

As you can see, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony QX1 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus TG-320
Portrait photography with Sony QX1
34
good MP (14 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
66
manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-320
Street photography with Sony QX1
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than others (155g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
69
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
features touch to focus
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Sports photography factors
Sony QX1 Sports photography factors
41
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (150 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
56
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good battery life (440 shots)
max frames per second low (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Travel photography camera
67
lighter than others (155g)
environment sealing
good MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
terrible battery (150 CIPA)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
71
good battery life (440 shots)
features touch to focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (216 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus TG-320
Landscape photography with Sony QX1
39
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
terrible battery (150 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse function
64
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (440 CIPA)
tiny screen ( inch)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
Sony QX1 as a Vlogging camera
32
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
lighter than others (155 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone port
32
touch screen
comes with face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Sony QX1
 Olympus TG-320Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus TG-320 Sony Alpha QX1
Class Waterproof Lens-style
Introduced 2012-01-10 2014-09-03
Physical type Compact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 1600 16000
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.1 -
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.6
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches -
Screen resolution 230k dots 0k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 216 gr (0.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 photos 440 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $0 $500