Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX350
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Announced December 2016
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX350 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus TG-320 and Sony HX350, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and HX350 (20MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-320 was introduced 6 years before the HX350 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TG-320 scores versus the HX350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony HX350
TG-320 | HX350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Olympus TG-320
HX350 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2016 | January 2012 | Fresher by 60 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony HX350
TG-320 | HX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony HX350 has dimensions of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-320 and Sony HX350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-320 vs the HX350.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and HX350 is 94 and 62 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing technical specs. The visual below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and HX350.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony HX350 to produce greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older TG-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2016-12-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 652 grams (1.44 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | 300 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | - |