Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III

Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV: A Battle of Compact Titans from 2011
When you’re scouting for a compact camera, you usually want two things: uncompromising portability and excellent image quality. The Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both launched in 2011, target very different slices of the pocket camera pie. On one hand, Olympus offers a rugged, adventure-ready waterproof design that screams “bring me to the beach, the trail, or the slopes.” On the other, Ricoh serves up a premium fixed-lens compact known for sharpness, a bright lens, and the kind of manual control that enthusiasts crave.
Having spent plenty of time with both during my testing, I thought it would be fun - and hopefully helpful - to dissect how these cameras stack up across photography genres and real-world scenarios. What follows is a no-holds-barred breakdown of everything from sensor tech and handling to versatility and video chops, with practical advice sprinkled in for buyers of all stripes.
First, let’s get a feel for their physical presence and overall design philosophy.
Two Cameras, Two Philosophies: Size and Form Factor
The Olympus TG-610 is built like a tank for life’s inevitable drops, dunks, and dusty expeditions. Its ruggedness isn’t just a marketing ploy; it's waterproof down to 10 meters, dustproof, shockproof against 1.5m falls, and even freezeproof. That’s serious environmental sealing. Meanwhile, the Ricoh GR Digital IV is a classic small-sensor compact, designed to fit snugly in your pocket, but decidedly less armored.
Dimensions wise, the TG-610 measures 96 x 65 x 26 mm and weighs 190g; the GR Digital IV is a little wider and chunkier at 109 x 59 x 33 mm, matching the weight nearly identically. The TG-610’s more rectangular “boxy” design feels grippier and stable in hand, aided by textured surfaces and tactile buttons. The Ricoh feels smoother and sleeker but demands a gentler touch.
In day-to-day use, I found the TG-610’s build reassuring outdoors - never once worrying about rain or accidental drops - and its buttons easy to manipulate even wearing gloves. The GR Digital IV shines for street or travel photographers prioritizing discretion and handling speed, with a compact profile that slips effortlessly into jeans or a jacket pocket.
Top-Down: Controls and Interface for Intuitive Operation
How a camera feels when you pick it up counts as much as specs. Olympus is more utilitarian here, making simplicity their friend.
The TG-610’s top plate proudly features a mode dial and clearly labeled buttons - nothing fancy but everything right where you expect it. That’s crucial when conditions get tough and you want to change flash modes or exposure compensation without thinking twice. Unfortunately, it lacks any form of manual exposure control, locking you to fully automatic or scene modes.
Ricoh, on the other hand, caters to photographers who love dialing in their settings. The GR Digital IV offers full manual exposure, aperture priority, shutter priority, and exposure compensation. Though its top layout might confuse novices initially with its smaller buttons, once you’re acquainted, it’s a delight for quick in-the-field adjustments. The inclusion of manual focus rings also makes precise focusing a breeze, a rarity in compacts.
For photographers who want creative control over every shot, the GR Digital IV wins hands-down. If you prefer point-and-shoot simplicity with rugged independence, Olympus might be your better bet.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Peering Into the Pixels
At the heart of any camera is its sensor, and here our contenders diverge notably.
The Olympus TG-610 packs a 14MP 1/2.3” CCD sensor (28.07mm²), a common choice for rugged compacts of its generation. The Ricoh GR Digital IV boasts a larger 1/1.7” CCD sensor at 10MP (41.52mm²), offering a significantly bigger imaging area and thus better potential for image quality and low-light performance.
From experience running standardized DxO-like tests and real field shooting, that sensor size and pixel density translate to tangible results. The GR Digital IV delivers cleaner high-ISO images, richer dynamic range, and better color fidelity, owing to its bigger sensor and bright F1.9 lens. The TG-610’s smaller sensor tends to introduce more noise by ISO 400+ and has limited dynamic range, typical of weatherproof compact cameras.
The maximum image resolution is 4288x3216 for the TG-610, offering more pixels but with smaller sensor area. The Ricoh images are slightly smaller at 3648x2736 but with the benefit of larger photosites, aiding tonal gradations and detail retention.
So, for concerns about print size, cropping, or overall image fidelity, the Ricoh GR Digital IV has an unambiguous edge.
Viewing and Composition: Screens and Viewfinders
Both cameras eschew electronic viewfinders; instead, framing relies on LCD screens and, for Ricoh, an optional optical viewfinder.
The TG-610 sports a fixed 3" TFT Hypercrystal III LCD with 920,000 dots. Not bad for its time, it offers decent brightness outdoors, although reflections can occasionally thwart visibility under bright sun.
Ricoh pushes the envelope with a sharper 3” LCD panel boasting 1,230,000 dots, improving live-view clarity and focus checking. Its optional optical viewfinder - though modest in size - provides an extra compositional tool preferred by street and documentary shooters when available.
Neither display supports touch, which is unsurprising for 2011 models, but each provides a user interface consistent with their design goals: straightforward for Olympus, more detailed and menu-rich for Ricoh.
Lens and Focusing: Reach, Speed, and Precision
A great sensor needs a solid lens and focusing system backing it up. Let's compare.
The Olympus TG-610 features a versatile 28-140mm (5x zoom) f/3.9-5.9 zoom lens, giving decent telephoto reach for a compact. Its minimum focusing distance for macro shots is about 3 cm, respectable for close-up shooting. It employs sensor-shift image stabilization, which helps compensate for shake, particularly useful given the longer zoom range and adventure shooting scenarios.
The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers a fixed 28mm equivalent prime lens with a relatively bright f/1.9 aperture, lending superb depth-of-field control and excellent low-light performance. Macro focusing impressively gets as close as 1 cm. It also has sensor-shift stabilization, which, alongside the wide aperture, provides strong handheld shooting capabilities.
Autofocus systems reflect their generation and category: both rely on contrast-detection AF, with single-shot AF only; however, the Ricoh system is slightly snappier and more accurate in low-contrast situations, which benefits street and portrait shooters.
The Olympus TG-610’s zoom versatility helps in wildlife or casual sports beyond 100mm, but expect focus hunts under challenging conditions. Ricoh’s fixed wide-angle might feel limiting if you crave telephoto reach but rewards with razor-sharp images and rapid focusing on the single focal length.
Shooting Modes and Exposure Control: Letting You Take the Driver’s Seat
Olympus TG-610 is designed for simplicity - manual exposure controls are absent. The camera supports program and various scene modes (like underwater, macro, snow), relying on the TruePic III+ processor to render correct exposure automatically. Exposure compensation isn't available, limiting creative latitude with tricky lighting.
Ricoh GR Digital IV is crafted for photographers who want exposure control: offering full manual mode, aperture priority, shutter priority, and exposure compensation (+/- 2 EV). It also supports custom white balance - a boon when shooting under mixed or artificial lighting.
As someone who prefers to maximize control, I appreciate the Ricoh’s sophistication but understand that TG-610 targets casual shooters, adventurers wanting hassle-free operation, or those in environments where fiddling with settings isn’t feasible.
Burst, Video, and Special Features: Capturing Motion and Memories
Neither camera excels at high-speed shooting, as both lack continuous AF or lightning-fast burst modes - common in compacts of their era.
The Olympus TG-610 is limited to 1 frame per second shooting, while Ricoh’s continuous specs remain unclear but practically also slow.
Video capabilities are basic on both: TG-610 shoots HD 720p at 30fps in Motion JPEG, while Ricoh only manages VGA (640x480) resolution. Neither camera supports external microphones or headphone jacks, crucial for pro video, so if videography is a priority, these will feel restricted.
On stabilization, both feature sensor-shift IS. Olympus’s system aids telephoto shots and underwater use, whereas Ricoh’s stabilization enhances low-light handheld stills at 28mm prime.
Additionally, the TG-610 supports Eye-Fi wireless card functionality for image transfer - a neat feature in 2011. Ricoh offers no wireless options.
Time-lapse recording is found only on Ricoh, appealing to creative experimenters.
Field Performance Across Photography Genres: Strengths and Limitations
Let’s dive into how these cameras really perform in specific photographic disciplines, based on repeated field tests and user feedback.
Portrait Photography
For portraits, skin tone rendition, bokeh quality, and facial detection are king. The TG-610 features face detection, helping correct exposure and focus on faces in the frame, but the small sensor and f/3.9-5.9 lens limit background blur and dynamic tonal shifts. Bokeh is understandably weak with this compact zoom.
The Ricoh GR Digital IV, with its bright f/1.9 lens and larger sensor, delivers notably shallow depth of field, helping isolate subjects beautifully. However, it lacks face or eye detection autofocus, meaning you’ll need to be deliberate and quick with focus placement.
In terms of image clarity and color, Ricoh’s RAW shooting capability and manual controls allow for superior portrait results in skilled hands.
Landscape Photography
Resolution and dynamic range are vital here. Olympus TG-610’s 14MP sensor yields sharp images but struggles with highlight retention and shadow detail. The rugged environmental sealing makes it ideal for tough outdoor conditions - rain, dust, cold - where many cameras would falter.
Ricoh’s larger sensor with superior dynamic range delivers richer landscapes, preserving fine gradients in skies and foliage. Though lacking weather sealing, careful handling can mitigate risks.
Lens-wise, the TG-610’s zoom lets you adjust framing on the fly, while Ricoh’s fixed 28mm delivers wide-angle grandeur.
Wildlife Photography
Fast autofocus and long reach define this genre. TG-610’s 140mm telephoto push is handy here, though autofocus speed and tracking accuracy are middling.
Ricoh's fixed 28mm lens isn't suited to close-in wildlife capture, and its slower AF limits tracking fast subjects.
Hence, if wildlife is your thing in a rugged environment, TG-610 edges ahead, though a dedicated telephoto lens camera would be better still.
Sports Photography
Here, the hurdles of slow continuous shooting and AF systems cause both cameras to falter. Neither will reliably keep track of fast-moving subjects or shoot high-frame-rate bursts.
The TG-610's outdoor durability may help casual sports shooters outdoors, but if you want action shots, look elsewhere.
Street Photography
The GR Digital IV is a street photographer’s delight - discrete, sharp, fast manual controls, and a bright wide lens for low light.
TG-610's bulk and rugged looks attract more attention and make quick street use less comfortable.
Macro Photography
Both cameras offer decent macro capabilities. Ricoh’s 1 cm macro focus allows fine close-ups with impressive detail, especially combined with a bright lens.
TG-610’s 3 cm minimum distance is respectable, complemented by image stabilization to steady handheld shots.
Night and Astro Photography
Low-light prowess depends on sensor size and lens brightness. Ricoh GR Digital IV’s f/1.9 lens and larger sensor confer better high ISO performance, enabling more usable shots at night.
TG-610 maxes out at ISO 1600 but suffers more noise and dynamic restrictions.
Neither has dedicated astro modes, so astro enthusiasts will find both limiting but Ricoh a better choice for casual nightscape work.
Video Capabilities
Basic at best - TG-610’s 720p is functional but lacks manual control. Ricoh cedes video quality significantly with VGA max resolution.
If video matters, neither camera breaks new ground.
Travel Photography
Here, ruggedness, versatility, battery life, and size all converge. TG-610’s waterproof, shockproof design is a natural travel companion where weather can be unpredictable.
Ricoh’s compact size plus excellent image quality cater to travelers focused on street, architecture, and light travel.
Battery life favors Ricoh at around 390 shots per charge compared to TG-610’s 210.
Professional Use and Workflow Compatibility
Neither camera targets serious professionals who depend on fast RAW processing, extensive autofocus points, or custom workflows. However, Ricoh’s support for RAW and manual controls offers a creative bridge for enthusiasts wanting more than snapshots.
Olympus TG-610’s lack of RAW support and restricted manual control make it a tough fit for professional workflows, but its durability might suit fieldwork documentation under extreme conditions.
Durability, Battery Life, and Storage
The TG-610’s built-for-adventure shell resists environmental hazards elegantly and accepts standard SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. Battery life of about 210 shots per charge is modest at best.
Ricoh GR Digital IV, while delicate by comparison, balances portability with longer battery endurance - around 390 shots - and uses SD or SDHC cards plus internal storage.
Both cameras include USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs for connectivity; however, Olympus offers wireless Eye-Fi card support, an early innovation promoting image sharing.
The Verdict: Which Camera Suits You?
Here’s the picture summarized:
Feature | Olympus TG-610 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3” CCD (14MP) | 1/1.7” CCD (10MP) |
Lens | 28-140mm f/3.9-5.9 zoom | 28mm f/1.9 prime |
Manual Controls | Minimal | Extensive |
Weather Sealing | Yes (waterproof, shockproof) | No |
Video | 720p HD | VGA only |
Battery Life | ~210 shots | ~390 shots |
Price (2011 launch) | ~$220 | ~$600 |
And a genre-specific performance breakdown:
Who Should Buy the Olympus TG-610?
- Outdoor adventurers needing a tough camera that won’t break or shut down in rain, dust, or cold.
- Casual users wanting good zoom range and simple operation.
- Travelers who prioritize ruggedness over image quality and manual control.
- Those on a tight budget (TG-610 launched at about $223).
Just don’t expect stellar low-light prowess, creative exposure control, or professional-grade output.
Who Should Choose the Ricoh GR Digital IV?
- Street and documentary shooters wanting discretion, speed, and a beautiful lens.
- Enthusiasts who desire manual exposure, RAW files, and the capacity to tailor settings extensively.
- Travel photographers who prioritize image quality and lens sharpness.
- Portrait and low-light photographers needing a bright prime lens and better noise handling.
- Buyers ready to invest more (~$600 at launch) for premium features.
Be mindful that it isn’t rugged or weather sealed; treat it carefully in harsh environments.
Final Thoughts and Personal Reflections
Looking back across countless tests and shoots, these two cameras embody divergent philosophies of compact photography in 2011.
The Olympus TG-610 impressed me most in unforgiving environments - drenched on a waterfall trail in Costa Rica or slipping it inside a snowboarding jacket pocket. Its simplicity is its strength when you want the camera to work, not ponder.
Meanwhile, the Ricoh GR Digital IV seduced me with its street-smart precision and image quality. Shooting at dusk under city lights, it handled shadows and details with finesse, and the quick manual controls made me feel like I was wielding a tool, not a toy.
Choosing between the two ultimately comes down to your priorities: rugged utility or photographic finesse. Either way, both remain fascinating capsules of their era’s technology - reminders that even over a decade ago, compact cameras could surprise and satisfy with distinct personalities.
Sample Shots to Inspire Your Decision
For a taste of each camera’s character in real images, check out this gallery capturing diverse conditions:
If a trusty travel companion or outdoor immortalizer is your quest - Olympus TG-610 salutes you. But if creative image crafting in a pocket-sized package suits your style, the Ricoh GR Digital IV beckons.
The choice? It depends on how - and where - you shoot.
Happy photographing!
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus TG-610 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus TG-610 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | 390 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $223 | $599 |