Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b299f/b299f5a5afefcfe28ea9cd44a81dc7ccf61def89" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front"
67 Imaging
50 Features
50 Overall
50
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched May 2009
- Older Model is Sony A300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Olympus TG-610 versus Sony A330, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-610 (14MP) and A330 (10MP) and the TG-610 (1/2.3") and A330 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-610 was introduced 20 months later than the A330 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TG-610 grades against the A330 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-610 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Sony A330
TG-610 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 20 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus TG-610
A330 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Sony A330
TG-610 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-610 offers outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony A330 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") with a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-610 versus Sony A330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-610 and the A330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7bca/f7bca7c7b329e1aa12c94c202bf5fbc912a72dd6" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 size comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-610 and A330 is 93 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1ed3/a1ed31a88a817e3d9d910ed21109e9518a8b94c4" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The photograph below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-610 and A330.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-610 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-610 will render more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer TG-610 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dde32/dde324bfd2d95bfa492305df8e51338696769fc8" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5a67/c5a6776e53e4dccfd3aa3cd0519c255e48bc26f9" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony A330 Specifications
Olympus TG-610 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-610 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2009-05-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 529g (1.17 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 535 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photographs | 230 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $223 | $545 |