Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
- Superseded the Sony NEX-3
- New Model is Sony NEX-F3
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-630 iHS was announced 17 months later than the NEX-C3 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-630 iHS matches up versus the NEX-C3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Sony NEX-C3
TG-630 iHS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | August 2011 | More recent by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
NEX-C3 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Sony NEX-C3
TG-630 iHS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has got physical measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has specifications of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-630 iHS and the NEX-C3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-630 iHS and NEX-C3 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The visual here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-630 iHS and NEX-C3.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-630 iHS having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony NEX-C3 will offer more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-630 iHS will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2011-08-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 lbs) | 225g (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 400 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $200 | $343 |