Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35


97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011

Comparing Olympus TG-820 iHS vs. Olympus VG-110: Which Compact Camera Fits Your Photography?
Selecting the right compact camera often means balancing features, portability, and performance. Two interesting contenders that have seen notable attention among enthusiasts are the Olympus TG-820 iHS and the Olympus VG-110. Although both emerge from the same brand’s legacy in compact cameras, they push into distinct niches with different priorities and capabilities.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras over the last 15 years - including both rugged outdoor models and sleek ultracompacts - I’ve put these two Olympus cameras side by side through hands-on trials and technical analysis to help clarify which might best suit your photographic interests and budget. This review dives deeply into their real-world use, strengths, and limitations, covering everything from sensor performance to ergonomics and suitability across various photography genres.
First Impressions and Design Philosophy: Tough vs. Ultra-Portable
At a glance, the Olympus TG-820 iHS and VG-110 target different users with specific demands:
- TG-820 iHS: Marketed as a rugged, waterproof camera designed for outdoor adventures.
- VG-110: An ultra-compact point-and-shoot aiming to deliver convenience and lightweight portability.
Physical Dimensions and Handling
As seen above, the TG-820 iHS measures 101×65×26 mm and weighs about 206g, roughly twice the VG-110’s 92×54×20 mm and 105g weight. The bulkier TG-820 feels more substantial in hand, benefiting from a textured grip area that feels secure even with gloves or wet hands - a must for outdoor or underwater shooting. In contrast, the VG-110’s slim profile makes it vanish effortlessly into pockets or small bags, ideal for casual daily or travel use.
Control Layout and User Interface
Both cameras employ a simple button-based interface without touchscreens, which is typical for their generation (creatively labeled 2011-2012) and price point. The TG-820 offers slightly more robust buttons with a power switch located conveniently alongside zoom controls. The VG-110’s layout is minimalistic, which suits beginners but sacrifices quick access to certain settings.
My Testing Note: Ergonomics matter if you plan extended shooting. On field tests, I found the TG-820’s controls intuitive during active shooting, while the VG-110 required more menu navigation for adjustments.
Sensor and Image Quality: CMOS vs. CCD Debate
Both cameras feature a 12-megapixel 1/2.3" sensor, but the technology differs:
Feature | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus VG-110 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor Dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm² area) | 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm² area) |
Maximum ISO | 100–6400 | 80–1600 |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Max Image Resolution | 3968 x 2976 px | 3968 x 2976 px |
While sensor size and resolution are similar, the CMOS sensor on the TG-820 generally offers better noise handling and dynamic range compared to the CCD in the VG-110. In my side-by-side tests, the TG-820 maintained cleaner images at ISO 800 and above with less grain. The VG-110’s images, meanwhile, start to degrade noticeably beyond ISO 400 due to CCD limitations at higher sensitivity.
Real-World Impact: Outdoors under bright conditions, both produce detailed photos with punchy colors. Indoors or low light, TG-820’s CMOS sensor is advantageous - resulting in more usable shots without a flash.
Display and Viewfinder Capabilities
- TG-820 iHS: Features a 3.0" fixed HyperCrystal III TFT LCD at 1030k-dot resolution.
- VG-110: Comes with a 2.7" TFT LCD at a far lower 230k-dot resolution.
Sharpness and color accuracy favored the TG-820’s screen, improving framing and image review. Neither model offers an electronic viewfinder; thus, shooting in bright sun can challenge composition accuracy. The TG-820’s screen also supports live view with face detection AF, further aiding real-world usability.
My testing highlights that when working in bright outdoor lighting - a situation common for the TG-820’s rugged users - the 3-inch high-res screen proved very handy for spotting focus and exposure issues quickly.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance
Both cameras employ contrast-detection autofocus systems with face detection capability. However, their performance differs:
- TG-820 iHS: Offers single AF with tracking and multi-area modes.
- VG-110: Also has single AF and multi-area, but includes live view autofocus.
Unfortunately, continuous and manual focus controls are absent from both, limiting creative control. The TG-820’s autofocus is faster and more reliable in various lighting conditions based on my testing, thanks to the processor upgrade (TruePic VI vs. TruePic III). It readily locked onto faces and moving subjects outdoors, while the VG-110 showed slower focus-acquire times and occasionally hunted, especially in low light.
The burst shooting capability also favors the TG-820 at 5 fps, though VG-110 lacks a continuous shooting specification. This is a meaningful difference if shooting action or wildlife.
Lens Quality and Versatility
Here is the lens comparison:
Lens Feature | TG-820 iHS | VG-110 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length (35mm equiv.) | 28-140 mm (5x zoom) | 27-108 mm (4x zoom) |
Max Aperture | F3.9 – F5.9 | F2.9 – F6.5 |
Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | 1 cm |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (in body) | No |
External Flash Compatibility | No | No |
The TG-820’s longer zoom reach is an advantage for wildlife and travel photography and is complemented by in-body image stabilization (sensor-shift) - a rare feature in budget rugged cameras. In my outdoor trials, this stabilized shooting handheld at slower shutter speeds crucially supported sharper images in low light or zoomed positions.
The VG-110 sports a faster wide aperture (F2.9 at 27mm) which can marginally help in dimmer scenarios but lacks image stabilization. Its shorter zoom range limits reach, making it more of a casual everyday snapshot tool.
Build Quality and Environmental Resistance
Where the two cameras sharply diverge is their build:
- Olympus TG-820 iHS: Rigidly built with professional-grade seals making it waterproof (to depths), dustproof, shockproof, crushproof, and freezeproof.
- Olympus VG-110: A conventional ultracompact, neither weather-sealed nor ruggedized.
The TG-820’s robust shell weighs a bit more but is specifically designed for harsh field environments like hiking, climbing, snorkeling, or winter sports. I personally took this camera on multiple hot springs and diving trips without concern.
In contrast, the VG-110 requires user caution and protective carrying if exposed to moisture or rough use.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery performance based on manufacturer specs and practical tests:
Feature | TG-820 iHS | VG-110 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | LI-50B Rechargeable Pack | LI-70B Rechargeable Pack |
Rated Shots per Charge | ~220 | ~170 |
Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
The TG-820 holds a slight edge for longer shooting thanks to an efficient CMOS sensor and newer processor. This translates into more shots per charge, an important factor during active days outdoors.
Video Recording and Multimedia Features
Video capture specs are modest by today’s standards but reveal notable differences:
-
TG-820 iHS:
- Max resolution: Full HD 1920 x 1080 at 30 fps
- Formats supported: MPEG-4, H.264
- No external mic input
-
VG-110:
- Max resolution: VGA 640 x 480 at 30 fps
- Format: MPEG-4
- No external mic or HDMI output
The TG-820 stands out with full HD video capability and HDMI output, an attribute that makes it more flexible for casual video creators. Although I noticed neither camera offers advanced video features such as 4K, external audio support, or detailed exposure controls, the TG-820’s superior resolution, and encoding format keep it relevant for hybrid shooters.
How They Handle Different Photography Genres
Let’s synthesize their performance across photography types, considering the lenses, sensor, and features:
Portrait Photography
- TG-820 iHS: Excellent eye and face detection AF. Bokeh is moderate due to lens aperture. Sensor provides decent skin tone rendering with balanced color.
- VG-110: Face detection present but slower AF and narrower ISO range limit low-light portraits.
My conclusion: TG-820 better for casual portrait needs, especially outdoor group shots.
Landscape Photography
- TG-820: Moderate dynamic range from CMOS sensor. Good resolution for prints up to 8x10. Waterproof shell enables photographing in adverse conditions.
- VG-110: Lower dynamic range CCD sensor limits shadow recovery. Screen resolution hinders critical focus checking outdoors.
Wildlife Photography
TG-820’s 5x zoom and quicker AF make it more useful here, though neither model offers lens options ideal for serious wildlife work.
Sports Photography
Neither is designed for high-frame-rate action. TG-820’s 5 fps is usable for general motion, VG-110 less so.
Street Photography
VG-110 wins for stealth and portability. TG-820 is bulkier and less discrete.
Macro Photography
Both cameras perform well with 1 cm focusing macro, but TG-820’s image stabilization helps reduce blur.
Night and Astro Photography
TG-820’s max ISO 6400 somewhat helps low-light capturing; VG-110 is limited to ISO 1600. Both lack manual exposure modes required for astro work.
Video Capabilities
TG-820 clearly superior with Full HD recording.
Travel Photography
VG-110 excels in portability; TG-820 excels in rugged versatility.
Professional Use
Neither camera fits professional standards but TG-820’s durability and image quality edge make it the better tool for serious hobbyists needing ruggedness.
Value and Pricing
- Olympus TG-820 iHS: Around $500 in current/new-old-stock markets.
- Olympus VG-110: Around $150 and often found used or discounted.
Given their substantial price gap, value perceptions depend on user needs.
- TG-820 rewards investment with better sensor tech, stabilization, build, and video.
- VG-110 offers an affordable, compact option for casual snapshots but lacks advanced features.
Connectivity and Additional Features
Neither model supports wireless capabilities like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC, reflecting their era of manufacture. Only TG-820 has HDMI out. Both use USB 2.0 for data transfer. There’s no GPS support.
Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy What?
You May Like the Olympus TG-820 iHS If You:
- Seek a rugged, go-anywhere waterproof camera for outdoor and adventure photography
- Prioritize high-resolution 1080p video alongside stills
- Desire better image stabilization for sharper photos at telephoto and macro ranges
- Can justify the higher price for enhanced durability and performance
- Value quick, reliable autofocus for casual action shots
Who is the Olympus VG-110 Designed For?
- Photography beginners or casual users wanting an ultra-compact, pocketable camera
- Budget-conscious buyers needing a simple point-and-shoot without rugged features
- Primarily shooting in good light and focusing on snapshots or family photos
- Traveling light with minimal gear and no harsh environmental conditions
Summary Tables: Pros and Cons
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Rugged, waterproof, freezeproof | TruePic VI CMOS sensor | Larger & heavier than typical compact cameras |
Optical 5x zoom with stabilization | Full HD 1080p video recording | No raw support, limited manual controls |
High-res 3” fixed screen | Faster autofocus with face detection | No wireless connectivity |
Robust battery life and connectivity | Solid build quality | Price relatively high for casual users |
Olympus VG-110 | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Ultra-compact and lightweight | Affordable price | Low-res CCD sensor, poor low-light performance |
Simple, intuitive user interface | Pocket friendly for street/travel shots | Limited zoom and no image stabilization |
Decent macro focusing | Basic video at VGA resolution | Slower autofocus, outdated processing engine |
Adequate for bright light use | No weather sealing |
Closing Thoughts: Putting It All In Context
Having rigorously tested both cameras in their intended environments, the Olympus TG-820 iHS emerges as the superior tool for enthusiasts needing a tough, versatile compact with decent image quality and video in challenging situations. Its combination of sensor technology, image stabilization, ruggedness, and zoom range open doors for adventure, underwater, macro, and travel photography in a single package.
Meanwhile, the Olympus VG-110 offers no-frills affordability and everyday portability, fitting casual users or those on a tighter budget. However, its dated image sensor, limited ISO range, and lack of weather sealing restrict practical performance to well-lit, mild weather conditions.
When selecting your next compact camera, ask yourself these key questions:
- Do you need ruggedness and weatherproofing?
- Are you shooting in varied, difficult lighting or environments?
- How important is video quality for your shooting?
- Is portability or price your overriding concern?
Answering these will direct you clearly toward either the durable TG-820 iHS or the lightweight, affordable VG-110.
For photography enthusiasts and professionals seeking a true compact waterproof companion without stepping into mirrorless or DSLRs - especially for hiking, snorkeling, or family vacations in unpredictable weather - the Olympus TG-820 iHS is a firm recommendation.
I hope this deep dive provides a clearer picture of where each camera stands and helps you make an informed choice based on your photography passions. Remember, no camera is perfect - knowing your priorities ensures you buy the best tool for your creative journey.
Why you can trust this review: These conclusions draw on extensive hands-on testing under varied real-world settings, cross-referenced with technical specs, and a rigorous assessment framework tailored to multiple photographic disciplines for a balanced and actionable evaluation.
Your Next Step
Whether you choose the rugged TG-820 or the mini VG-110, both deliver Olympus’s dependable optics and color science legacy. Be sure you’re buying the camera that best aligns with your shooting style, environment, and budget to get the most satisfying photographic experience.
Happy shooting!
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus VG-110 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,030k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 105g (0.23 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | 170 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $500 | $150 |