Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Olympus VG-110, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was introduced 13 months after the VG-110 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the VG-110 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus VG-110. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus VG-110
| TG-820 iHS | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | February 2011 | Newer by 13 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| VG-110 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus VG-110
| TG-820 iHS | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys exterior dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has specifications of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Olympus VG-110 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the VG-110.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and VG-110 is 92 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The image here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and VG-110.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP so you should expect comparable quality of photos but you may want to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more modern TG-820 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus VG-110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus VG-110 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,030k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 105g (0.23 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | 170 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $500 | $150 |