Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-820 iHS was unveiled 24 months prior to the WG-4 GPS making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the TG-820 iHS scores vs the WG-4 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TG-820 iHS | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | 460k | Clearer display (+570k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
WG-4 GPS | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | February 2012 | Newer by 24 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TG-820 iHS | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the WG-4 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The pic here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and WG-4 GPS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 240 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $500 | $210 |