Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB30F
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB30F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-820 iHS was launched 11 months earlier than the WB30F so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the WB30F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung WB30F
| TG-820 iHS | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| WB30F | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB30F
| TG-820 iHS | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB30F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the WB30F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and WB30F is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and WB30F.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB30F to offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,030 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 128 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $500 | $180 |
