Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/791ae/791aebc8a3b37ba2887be6bf87ec90d5ae9b78ee" alt="Sony ZV-1 front Sony ZV-1 front"
88 Imaging
55 Features
86 Overall
67
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 294g - 105 x 60 x 44mm
- Announced May 2020
- New Model is Sony ZV-1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony ZV-1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and ZV-1 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and ZV-1 (1") feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was brought out 9 years prior to the ZV-1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony ZV-1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the ZV-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony ZV-1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony ZV-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony ZV-1
TG-820 iHS | ZV-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 922k | Sharper screen (+108k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony ZV-1 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
ZV-1 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2020 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 101 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony ZV-1
TG-820 iHS | ZV-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony ZV-1 has proportions of 105mm x 60mm x 44mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.7") and a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony ZV-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the ZV-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a5f7/3a5f72d730e30413dcd33eb748852743f944a2fa" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and ZV-1 is 92 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0ac0/a0ac032ceb1c073fcc1695d3d8a0ef898814227e" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The image below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and ZV-1.
As you have seen, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony ZV-1 will produce more detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55885/55885b671b9b977a7f0dbb14de2c1ba5a8d215d9" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0415d/0415d7538a88ebbadf0e5c3022a9ad2de90f70e0" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony ZV-1 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony ZV-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony ZV-1 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2020-05-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 24.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 24 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 294 grams (0.65 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 105 x 60 x 44mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 260 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $500 | $750 |