Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic G95
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


67 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Launched April 2019
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-G90
- Succeeded the Panasonic G85

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic G95, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor size.

The TG-830 iHS was announced 7 years prior to the G95 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-830 iHS matches up vs the G95 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Panasonic G95
TG-830 iHS | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
G95 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2019 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 75 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+780k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic G95
TG-830 iHS | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has external measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Panasonic G95 has sizing of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") having a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic G95 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-830 iHS against the G95.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-830 iHS and G95 is 91 and 67 respectively.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The image underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-830 iHS and G95.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-830 iHS with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Panasonic G95 will give extra detail with its extra 4.3MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-830 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20.3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) | 536 grams (1.18 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 290 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $998 |