Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer different sensor size.

The TG-830 iHS was launched 3 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-830 iHS scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TG-830 iHS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2009 | More recent by 39 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TG-830 iHS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-830 iHS offers exterior measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-830 iHS versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 91 and 77 respectively.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The visual below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-830 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-830 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will result in more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The newer TG-830 iHS should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214g (0.47 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 320 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $566 |