Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony H200
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony H200 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony H200, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is very similar and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-830 iHS was announced very close to the H200 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-830 iHS matches up versus the H200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony H200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sony H200
TG-830 iHS | H200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
H200 | TG-830 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony H200
TG-830 iHS | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | January 2013 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-830 iHS comes with outer measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony H200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-830 iHS and the H200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and H200 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading specifications. The image underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-830 iHS and H200.
To sum up, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Sony H200 to offer you greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 20cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214g (0.47 pounds) | 530g (1.17 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 240 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | LI-50B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $250 |