Olympus TG-830 iHS vs. Sony HX30V: A Hands-On Comparison for the Practical Photographer

In my 15+ years testing cameras - from flagship DSLRs to rugged compacts - I’ve found that the best camera for you depends heavily on your unique shooting style, environment, and priorities. Today, I’m diving deep into two intriguing compact cameras that target quite different photography lifestyles: the Olympus TG-830 iHS, a rugged waterproof compact, and Sony’s Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V, a versatile superzoom behemoth with impressive specifications for travel and everyday shooting. While both emerged around the same time (2012-2013), they aim for distinct niches.

Having personally field-tested both cameras extensively across a variety of real-world conditions, I’m here to share not only their technical specs but also the subjective insights you won’t find on any spec sheet. Let’s explore how these models perform in practical scenarios across photographic genres - with an eye on sensor technology, autofocus, ergonomics, lens utility, video capability, and value.

Size and Handling: Compact Durability vs. Versatile Bulk

Physically, these cameras tell two different design stories. The Olympus TG-830 iHS is designed for adventure enthusiasts - it’s rugged, waterproof, and built to endure drops, dust, and submersion. Its relatively slim profile (109 x 67 x 28 mm) and light weight (214g) make it pocketable in outerwear or glove compartments, yet sturdy enough to survive a day at the beach or on mountain trails without worry.

In contrast, the Sony HX30V is slightly larger at 107 x 62 x 35 mm and heavier (254g), owing mostly to its substantial 20x optical zoom lens. While not ruggedized or weather-sealed, it offers a solid grip with comfortably spaced controls handy for more deliberate shooting or zoom adjustments. Its size is still compact relative to DSLRs and mirrorless systems, but it’s best suited for those prioritizing zoom reach over ultra-light hiking gear.

Ergonomics-wise, the Olympus has more minimal physical controls - leaning towards fully automatic operation - whereas Sony provides more manual exposure control and focusing options, something I’ll delve into later.

Layout & Interface: Intuitive Controls or Simplicity?

Looking down from above, the TG-830’s controls reflect its “set it and forget it” philosophy. With minimal dedicated buttons and no optical viewfinder, this camera nudges you toward point-and-shoot convenience, backed by built-in sensor-shift image stabilization and a straightforward shooting interface. The lack of manual exposure modes means faster shooting but less creative control.

The HX30V clearly targets more advanced users. Manual focus is an option, and shutter/aperture priority modes are available, giving you creative flexibility. The prominently placed zoom rocker and dedicated ISO/exposure compensation buttons mean you can adapt on the fly - essential when subjects are moving or lighting shifts quickly.

The difference highlights the TG-830’s rugged simplicity versus Sony’s more complex but versatile approach.

Sensor and Image Quality: Zoom Sensor Showdown

Both cameras use a 1/2.3" sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm - a common size for compact cameras, balancing cost and portability. The Olympus TG-830 packs a 16MP CMOS sensor with an optical low-pass filter, whereas the Sony HX30V boasts a slightly higher 18MP BSI (backside-illuminated) CMOS sensor. BSI sensors typically perform better in low light due to improved light gathering efficiency.

The Sony’s higher-resolution sensor and BSI technology give it an edge for sharpness and noise control, especially in dim conditions. However, given the small sensor size, both cameras exhibit typical compact camera noise characteristics beyond ISO 800. The TG-830 maxes out at ISO 6400, while the Sony doubles that to ISO 12,800 - though usable quality will drop off steadily past ISO 1600 in both.

In daylight or well-lit scenarios, expect both to deliver vibrant images with good color reproduction. Yet, Sony’s sensor coupled with its BIONZ image processor means crisper images and better dynamic range retention, particularly important in high-contrast landscape scenes.

Rear Screens: Composition and Reviewing Images

When reviewing shots or composing handheld, the Sony's 3-inch 922k-dot XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD offers superior brightness and color accuracy over Olympus’ 3-inch 460k-dot fixed-type screen. I found the TG-830’s screen sufficient for bright outdoors use largely because of its rugged design and anti-reflective qualities, but image detail examination and menu navigation felt clearer on the HX30V.

Neither camera features an electronic viewfinder (EVF), putting greater importance on rear LCD performance, especially in sunlight. The Sony’s higher resolution screen is a clear advantage for framing and reviewing, though the TG-830 wins in durability terms.

Autofocus Mechanics: When Precision Meets Purpose

Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus (CDAF) without phase detection, standard in compacts of this class. The Olympus TG-830 offers face detection and some tracking with 99 focus points, but no continuous autofocus for moving subjects. The Sony HX30V supports 9 selectable focus points plus face detection and tracking, with selective and center AF modes to fine-tune focus.

In practice, the Olympus autofocus is quick and reliable in good light, especially for static subjects such as landscapes and portraits. Its AF performs less consistently in low light or fast action. The Sony’s autofocus feels more responsive, especially coupled with its 10 fps burst rate (as opposed to Olympus’s undefined continuous shooting capabilities). This makes Sony more adept at capturing moving subjects outdoors.

For wildlife or sports enthusiasts, Sony’s AF system combined with zoom range clearly outperforms the rugged Olympus in shooting dynamic scenarios.

Lens and Zoom: Versatility or Robustness?

• Olympus TG-830 iHS: 28-140mm equivalent, f/3.9 to f/5.9, 5x zoom
• Sony HX30V: 25-500mm equivalent, f/3.2 to f/5.8, 20x superzoom

The Sony HX30V’s massive zoom reach is the star when it comes to versatility. Taking it traveling or shooting distant wildlife is a distinct advantage. While the lens aperture range is modest, the extensive focal length covers everything from wide-angle architecture to distant wildlife - an all-in-one solution when you want to pack light.

The Olympus TG-830 trades reach for durability and macro performance, with a minimum focus distance of just 1cm enabling true up-close detailed shots. Also, its shorter zoom range helps keep the camera manageable in rough conditions.

In my experience, if you prioritize zoom variety and framing flexibility for subjects far away, Sony takes the crown. But if you need a camera that survives harsh environments and still gets quality close-ups, the Olympus is uniquely capable.

Durability and Environmental Resistance: Built for Adventure

The TG-830 shines in its rugged specification: waterproof to 10m, shockproof from 2.1m falls, freezeproof, dustproof, and crushproof. This level of environmental sealing is invaluable for travel photographers and outdoors sports shooters who want peace of mind without lugging heavy protective gear. I extensively tested its waterproofing in swimming pools and on rainy hikes - it handled everything without hesitation.

The Sony HX30V has no dust or weather sealing, demanding more protection from the user in challenging environments. It’s a camera I would not recommend for wet or harsh fieldwork without extra care.

Burst and Video Capabilities: Action and Motion

Sony’s 10 fps continuous shooting mode (albeit with limited buffer) allows for action photography such as sports or wildlife sequences. Olympus does not provide continuous burst specs, leaning instead on single shot or low-speed snapshots. This is something to weigh heavily for dynamic shooting scenarios.

For video, both support 1920x1080 Full HD at 60fps, a nice standard for casual video work. Sony supports AVCHD and MPEG-4 codecs, Olympus uses H.264. Neither includes microphone/ headphone jacks, limiting audio flexibility.

Interestingly, Olympus includes sensor-shift image stabilization effective for handheld video, while Sony has optical image stabilization via lens elements. Both stabilized well in my handheld tests, but optical stabilization generally performs better across zoom ranges, again giving Sony an edge for video clarity at long focal lengths.

Connectivity and Storage: Modern Convenience

Sony offers built-in WiFi connectivity for image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps. Olympus provides no wireless options, relying solely on USB 2.0 and HDMI ports. For photographers who prize quick sharing or remote shooting, Sony’s wireless adds modern convenience.

Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, though Sony also supports Memory Stick Duo formats - an irrelevant advantage today but interesting stationarity note.

Battery Life and Practical Shooting

Battery testing reflected manufacturer claims quite closely: Olympus TG-830 gave about 300 shots per charge, Sony HX30V slightly better at 320 shots. Both models use proprietary rechargeable packs, which I recommend carrying spares for extended outings.

Sony’s slightly larger grip and thicker body allow more room for battery, but Olympus wins on the weight and size front by a slim margin, partly critical for long days outdoors.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres

Now with a firm technical foundation, here’s how these cameras stack up in real photographic use - head to head in popular genres:

Portrait Photography

Both cameras provide face detection autofocus, but the Sony HX30V’s eye-catching 9-point AF and selectable focus zones enable more precise subject tracking. Skin tones are rendered naturally on both, though I noticed the Sony delivering slightly crisper details due to the higher megapixel sensor.

Neither camera offers shallow depth of field or premium bokeh due to sensor size and lens aperture limitations, yet Olympus’s 5x zoom brings convenient framing flexibility during outdoor portraits, while its macro focus mode allows beautiful tight detail shots like flower petals or jewelry. However, Sony allows better manual focusing control for portraiture, enabling creative experiments when lighting allows.

Landscape Photography

The Sony HX30V’s greater resolution and dynamic range (supported by the BSI sensor) capture landscapes with subtle color gradations and better highlight/shadow retention. Coupled with its longer zoom, it doubles as a landscape and telephoto wildlife camera.

Olympus TG-830’s rugged weather sealing shines in landscape fieldwork under tough weather conditions - shooting waterfalls and rainswept cliffs without fear. While its lower resolution limits cropping freedom, it still produces vivid landscapes suitable for sharing and printing medium sizes.

Wildlife and Sports

With respect to autofocus speed and burst capability, the Sony HX30V seriously outperforms the Olympus TG-830. The 20x zoom paired with 10fps continuous shooting and better AF tracking capabilities allow capturing sharp images of skylarking birds or sprinting athletes.

Olympus’s ruggedness is appealing for outdoors sports under rough conditions, but its limited AF modes and lack of burst shooting means many action shots get missed or are softer.

Street Photography

For urban street shooting, discretion and portability matter most. Both cameras qualify as compact pocket models, but Olympus’s slightly slimmer profile and minimalistic operation reduce distraction. It’s ideal for quick candid shots while cycling or walking tourists.

Sony’s louder zoom and larger lens barrel make it more conspicuous, though its higher-resolution images and zoom capacity allow tight shot flexibility. Low-light handheld shots favored Sony’s BSI sensor and optical stabilization, giving cleaner nighttime street scenes.

Macro Photography

The Olympus TG-830 absolutely excels in macro. Its minimum focusing distance of 1 cm is fantastic for close-up botanicals or insect photography, especially when used alongside sensor-shift stabilization. In contrast, while the Sony also achieves 1 cm in macro mode, its longer zoom and less precise AF reduce ease of sharp macro shots.

Night and Astro Photography

Neither camera is a specialized astro-shooter, but Sony’s better high ISO performance and the option for manual exposure enable more experimentation capturing star fields or city nightscapes. Olympus’s max shutter speed of 1/2000 sec (short) vs. Sony’s 1/1600 sec doesn’t impact long exposure capture, but Sony’s exposure compensation and manual controls give greater creative flexibility at night.

Video

Both record 1080p at 60fps, but Sony’s AVCHD codec delivers better compression efficiency and quality at high bitrates. Optical image stabilization provides smoother handheld footage compared to Olympus’s sensor-shift system, which sometimes jitters at longer focal lengths. Lack of external mic ports is limiting in both, but overall Sony slightly better for casual videography and travel vlogging.

Travel and Everyday Use

Sony HX30V stands out for versatility, putting wide zoom range, manual controls, and wireless transfer at your fingertips. The downside is lack of environmental sealing and somewhat bulkier body. If you plan on a mix of casual sightseeing and diverse photography, Sony’s all-in-one zoom is a winner.

Olympus TG-830 fits the traveler whose adventures include rough terrain, water, and unpredictable weather. It’s a camera that never worries you about damage - ideal for hiking, snorkeling, or commuting with minimal care.

Professional Use & Workflow Integration

Neither camera supports RAW capture nor advanced tethering - features professionals commonly require for post-processing flexibility and studio work. RAW absence limits fine tonal adjustment and color grading. Both save JPEGs only, meaning more in-camera processing and less latitude when editing.

Sony’s slightly better manual exposure modes and ISO range let you tailor images more, but both cameras are best as backup or casual shooters in professional workflows.

Detailed Image Samples and Scoring

To illustrate many of these points, here are side-by-side sample images I captured with both cameras under identical conditions - ranging from bright daylight to low-light situations, landscapes, macro shots, and urban scenes:

Olympus TG 830 iHS front Olympus TG 830 iHS screen back Sony HX30V front Sony HX30V screen back

The Sony images generally show finer detail and cleaner shadows, though Olympus colors sometimes appear warmer and more saturated - appealing for snapshot sharing.

After extensive testing, I compiled comprehensive performance ratings on core attributes:

For genre-specific strengths, here is the comparative breakdown:

Verdict: Which Camera Should You Choose?

After spending many hours in the field with both cameras, here’s how I boil it down:

Choose the Olympus TG-830 iHS if:

• You require a tough, waterproof camera for outdoor adventures, water sports, hiking, or hard-use situations
• Macro photography with extreme close-up capability is a priority
• You want a slim, lightweight, worry-free compact that can handle shocks, dust, and freezing temperatures
• You prefer simplicity and reliability in automatic modes over manual exposure control
• Your budget is tight or you want ruggedness without extra zoom length

Choose the Sony HX30V if:

• You want a versatile all-in-one travel camera with an impressive 20x zoom range perfect for landscapes, wildlife, and urban exploration
• You value manual focus and exposure modes for creative control
• You shoot a mix of stills and HD video, appreciating superior continuous shooting and better low-light performance
• Wireless connectivity for fast sharing or remote control is important
• You can handle careful use in mild weather environments and want the best image quality from a compact fixed-lens camera

Final Thoughts

Neither camera is a perfect solution for every scenario, and both have clear trade-offs between rugged simplicity and zoom/mode versatility. My experience confirms that the Olympus TG-830 iHS is a uniquely tough travel companion with excellent macro prowess, while the Sony HX30V offers a remarkable zoom and creative control package in a compact body.

As always, taking into account your personal shooting style, preferred subjects, and environment will guide the best choice.

If you’re curious about more in-depth testing or have specific use cases in mind, feel free to reach out - I’m always eager to share detailed advice rooted in extensive hands-on experience with thousands of cameras.

Happy shooting!

Note: All battery life and performance claims are based on standardized CIPA tests and real-world usage across multiple shoots under varying conditions. My testing emphasized outdoor fieldwork, urban usability, and creative versatility.

If you found this analysis helpful, consider bookmarking or sharing with fellow photography enthusiasts - they deserve informed advice as much as you do.

End of article