Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony T900 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony T900, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 3 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the TG-1 iHS grades against the T900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony T900
| TG-1 iHS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 40 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| T900 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 610k | Crisper display (+312k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony T900
| TG-1 iHS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS features physical dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony T900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-1 iHS against the T900.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The visual here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and T900.
As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files although you really should consider the age of the cameras into account. The newer TG-1 iHS will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 143g (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $300 |