Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Old Model is Pentax K100D S
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is relatively well matched but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and K200D (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-2 iHS was released 4 years after the K200D which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the K200D when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Pentax K200D. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Pentax K200D
| TG-2 iHS | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | September 2008 | More modern by 59 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| K200D | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax K200D
| TG-2 iHS | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS offers exterior measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Pentax K200D has dimensions of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") along with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the K200D.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and K200D is 91 and 61 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The pic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and K200D.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will give extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-2 iHS will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax K200D |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2008-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 690 gr (1.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $380 | $600 |