Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
![Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Tough-TG-2-iHS/Olympus-TG-2-iHS-front.jpg)
![Pentax WG-10 front Pentax WG-10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-WG-10/Pentax-WG-10-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the WG-10 (14MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The TG-2 iHS was manufactured within a month of the WG-10 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the WG-10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Pentax WG-10. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Pentax WG-10
TG-2 iHS | WG-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
WG-10 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax WG-10
TG-2 iHS | WG-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | ![]() | June 2013 | Same age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got external measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-10 has sizing of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the WG-10.
![Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-2-iHS-vs-Pentax-WG-10-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and WG-10 is 91 and 93 respectively.
![Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-2-iHS-vs-Pentax-WG-10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The pic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and WG-10.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-10 to produce extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively.
![Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-2-iHS-vs-Pentax-WG-10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-2-iHS-vs-Pentax-WG-10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax WG-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax WG-10 |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2013-06-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | OLED | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 1.20 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 260 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $380 | $0 |