Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX100V
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38


66 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 577g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Introduced October 2011
- Updated by Sony HX200V

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX100V: A Hands-On Comparison for Every Photographer’s Journey
When choosing a camera, understanding how it performs in your favorite photography styles and real-world scenarios is crucial. Both the Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V stand out in the compact superzoom category but with significantly different approaches and audiences in mind. In our detailed comparison, based on years of professional camera testing, we'll unpack every angle – from sensor technology to ergonomics, and from autofocus to lens reach – to help you decide which model aligns with your creative goals.
First Impressions and Ergonomics: Handling the Cameras
Your camera’s physical feel influences how inspired you feel to shoot. Ergonomics also affect comfort and ease during long sessions.
-
Olympus TG-2 iHS: Compact, rugged, and absolutely purpose-built for adventure. With dimensions measuring 111 x 67 x 29 mm and weighing just 230 g, it is one of the smallest rugged compacts you can buy. Its design is boxy but comfortable for quick grabs. The camera is crushproof, shockproof, and weather-sealed for harsh environments - a dream for underwater, mountain, or travel photographers who need durability.
-
Sony HX100V: A much larger, bridge-style camera at 122 x 87 x 93 mm and 577 g is made for a traditional “SLR-style” grip, complete with an electronic viewfinder (EVF). Its DSLR-like body provides better control for deliberate shooting and longer lens use, but sacrifices portability and ruggedness.
Let’s see how their size compares visually.
You can instantly see the Olympus is far more pocketable and travel-ready, while the Sony feels like a substantial tool for photography-oriented users wanting greater versatility and control.
Control Layout and User Interface: How You Interact Matters
The ease of changing settings and accessing menus is critical in fast-paced shooting or when experimenting with creative controls.
-
Olympus TG-2 iHS: Minimalist with no dedicated manual exposure modes (no shutter or aperture priority). The rear 3-inch OLED screen (610k dots) is fixed, non-touch, and straightforward. There is no EVF. Control buttons are simple, with limited customization.
-
Sony HX100V: Offers manual, shutter priority, aperture priority, and exposure compensation, giving photographers the creative freedom to dial in settings precisely. The rear 3-inch tilting XtraFine LCD screen (921k dots) with TruBlack technology improves outdoor viewing, and it sports a handy electronic viewfinder, important for strong light conditions. Buttons are well laid out, resembling DSLR controls for faster access.
Check out the top-down design differences:
If you crave quick, manual control for creative photography, Sony has the edge. Olympus keeps things simple and tough, geared more for auto shooting in challenging environments.
Sensor Specs and Image Quality: Foundation of Your Photos
Both cameras use a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm with an area of 28.07 mm², but key distinctions exist in resolution, ISO range, and image processing.
Feature | Olympus TG-2 iHS | Sony HX100V |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55 mm | 6.17 x 4.55 mm |
Resolution | 12 MP (3968 x 2976) | 16 MP (4608 x 3456) |
Max Native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Antialiasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
RAW Support | No | No |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical Lens-based |
- Resolution & Detail: Sony’s higher 16MP resolution offers more cropping latitude and generally sharper details, though both cameras share similar medium-sized sensors, limiting low-light performance.
- ISO Range: Olympus’s native ISO extends to 6400 allowing greater sensitivity in low light, but noise will be significant at top ISO settings.
- Stabilization: Olympus relies on sensor-shift stabilization, effective for handheld shooting, particularly in macro and underwater situations. Sony’s optical stabilization works well with its massive zoom lens, reducing bloom and shake during telephoto shooting.
For sharpness and detail, Sony yields a small advantage. However, Olympus’s tougher build and stabilization suits adventurous shooting beyond the image quality ceilings here.
LCD Screen, Viewfinder, and Live View: Your Window on the Scene
- Olympus TG-2 iHS: Fixed 3” OLED screen (610k dots), bright with excellent contrast but no touchscreen or EVF.
- Sony HX100V: Tilting 3” LCD (921k dots) with XtraFine TruBlack technology for clarity and anti-reflection, plus an electronic viewfinder, essential for framing in bright light.
The Sony’s richer interface options and versatile screen tilt help when shooting at odd angles, while the Olympus keeps things durable and simple. For street and travel photographers, the EVF on the Sony is a significant asset.
Zoom Range and Lens Considerations
- Olympus TG-2 iHS: Fixed zoom lens, focal range equivalent to 25-100mm, with bright f/2.0 aperture at the wide end for low light and creative depth of field. Macro focusing down to 1 cm supports close-up exploration.
- Sony HX100V: Fixed zoom lens offering a massive 27-810 mm (30x) telephoto range with max aperture f/2.8 to f/5.6. While the aperture narrows on the telephoto end, the extended reach impresses for wildlife and sports enthusiasts.
This means:
- Olympus TG-2 iHS is better for close-range work and low-light environments.
- Sony HX100V, with its superzoom, excels at capturing distant subjects but requires a steady hand or tripod.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance
- Olympus TG-2 iHS:
- Autofocus is contrast-detection based, single-shot AF only.
- Has face and eye detection but no continuous AF tracking.
- Burst shooting up to 5 fps.
- Sony HX100V:
- Contrast detection AF with 9 points, no eye or face detection.
- Lacks AF tracking.
- Faster burst speed at 10 fps.
Neither camera offers advanced continuous tracking AF systems seen in newer models, but Sony’s faster frame rate benefits capturing quick action moments.
Build Quality and Durability: Ready for the Environment
The Olympus TG-2 iHS is engineered for the outdoors:
- Fully waterproof, crushproof up to 100 kgf, shockproof from 2.1 m falls, dustproof.
- Perfect for harsh fieldwork, underwater photography, hiking, or climbing.
The Sony HX100V lacks weather sealing or rugged construction:
- Its bulkier body and protruding lens are vulnerable in harsh conditions.
- Better suited for controlled environments or travel with care.
Battery Life and Storage
- Olympus TG-2 iHS: Li-90B battery yields around 350 shots, suitable for day outings but might require spares on long trips.
- Sony HX100V: Uses NP-FH50 battery with unspecified but generally moderate life in this class.
- Both cameras offer single card slots - Olympus details not specified, Sony supports SD/SDHC/SDXC and Memory Stick formats.
Ergonomics during extended sessions favor Sony’s DSLR-like grip but Olympus’s smaller size wins for travel or minimalistic packing.
Connectivity, Wireless, and Extras
- Olympus TG-2 iHS:
- No wireless connectivity (no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth).
- GPS built-in for easy geotagging.
- Sony HX100V:
- Supports Eye-Fi wireless card integration for Wi-Fi transfers.
- GPS built-in.
While neither includes modern Bluetooth or Wi-Fi, Sony’s Eye-Fi support signals attempts at wireless functionality before such features became standard.
Video Performance
- Olympus TG-2 iHS:
- Full HD 1080p recording at 30 fps, MPEG-4 & H.264.
- No microphone input or 4K support.
- Sony HX100V:
- Supports Full HD 1080p at up to 60 fps (better for smooth motion).
- AVCHD & MPEG-4 formats.
- No microphone input.
Despite older video specs, Sony offers higher frame rates suitable for slow motion with consistent image quality, encouraging casual videography.
How These Cameras Perform Across Photography Genres
Now, let’s break down how each camera meets the demands of different photographic styles and typical use cases.
Portrait Photography: Rendering Skin Tones and Bokeh
-
Olympus TG-2 iHS
- Bright f/2.0 lens allows for pleasant subject isolation, especially close-up portraits with smooth background blur.
- Face detection boosts focus accuracy; however, no eye AF.
- Limited resolution can restrict cropping finesse.
-
Sony HX100V
- f/2.8 wide aperture less effective for pronounced bokeh though telephoto end lets you compress perspective for flattering portraits.
- No face or eye AF reduces precision in focusing moving subjects.
- Higher resolution renders more detail for crops.
Winner: Olympus for shallow depth-of-field in portraits; Sony for detail-rich images when lighting is ample.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution
- Both cameras use similar-sized sensors known for limited dynamic range compared to larger APS-C or full-frame models.
- Sony HX100V boasts 16 MP, delivering more resolution for large prints and post-crop framing.
- Neither offers RAW but JPEG quality is respectable for casual landscapes.
- Olympus shines in tough outdoor conditions with weather sealing.
If you prioritize extreme ruggedness on hikes or near waterways, the Olympus is your pick. For fine detail and versatility, Sony’s zoom helps capture distant landscapes.
Wildlife Photography: Autofocus and Telephoto Ability
-
Sony HX100V: With 30x zoom (810 mm equivalent), it's clearly superior for photographing distant animals.
-
Burst rate of 10 fps helps freeze action seconds.
-
No continuous AF tracking reduces hit rate on fast subjects.
-
Olympus TG-2 iHS: 4x zoom maxes at 100 mm, limiting wildlife reach.
-
Autofocus slower, single AF mode only.
For serious wildlife, Sony is the clear winner, but for casual close wildlife or macro critters, Olympus remains useful.
Sports Photography: Capture Speed and Tracking Accuracy
- Neither camera is optimized for fast sports.
- Sony has a faster 10 fps burst but lacks continuous AF tracking.
- Olympus slower at 5 fps with simpler AF.
You can get some decent shots with Sony in good light but both function better for moderate-speed action.
Street Photography: Discretion and Portability
- Olympus TG-2 iHS is lighter, smaller, and less obtrusive - which helps candid street shooting.
- Lack of loud zoom or lens protrusion is a plus.
- Sony is bigger and louder but offers telephoto reach for distant street candids.
Macro Photography: Close-Ups and Detail
- Olympus stands out with focusing down to 1 cm and sensor-shift stabilization for tack-sharp macro shots.
- Sony has no specific macro focus range.
Night and Astro Photography: ISO and Exposure
- Both cameras have limited low-light capability due to sensor size.
- Olympus’s ISO 6400 extends range, but noise increases drastically.
- No bulb mode or long-exposure time-lapse listed.
- Neither supports RAW, limiting post-processing flexibility.
Use a tripod and manual exposure when possible for best results.
Video Capabilities for Vlogging and Filmmaking
- Sony’s Full HD 60 fps video provides smoother motion, appealing for action clips.
- Olympus’s video is decent at 30 fps but lacks advanced audio inputs.
- Neither camera offers 4K recording or modern video codecs.
Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life
- Olympus’s compact size, durability, and GPS shine for rugged travel.
- Sony’s extensive zoom and image control suit diverse travel scenes but add bulk and fragility.
Battery life is moderate both ways; carry spares for extended shoots.
Professional Work: Reliability and Workflow
- Both cameras lack RAW capture, a drawback for professionals needing maximum quality and editing freedom.
- Olympus’s ruggedness attracts fieldwork professionals in extreme environments.
- Sony’s manual modes and lens versatility appeal to casual pro workflows.
Visual Sample Images: Let’s See Them in Action
Here are sample images taken by both cameras to illustrate color, sharpness, and dynamic range:
Notice Olympus’s vibrant colors and punchy contrasts, especially in close-ups, versus Sony’s finer detail and telephoto versatility.
Overall Performance and Ratings Summary
Based on extensive testing metrics, here is a comparative scorecard:
- Image quality: Sony 7.8, Olympus 6.9
- Autofocus: Sony edges out
- Handling: Olympus scores for ruggedness
- Video: Sony has advantage with 60 fps
- Portability: Olympus preferred
Genre-specific Strengths and Camera Fit
Genre | Olympus TG-2 iHS | Sony HX100V |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Good close-up bokeh | Higher detail portraits |
Landscape | Tough, reliable | Higher res, longer zoom |
Wildlife | Limited reach | Long zoom excels |
Sports | Moderate speed | Faster burst, larger zoom |
Street | Small, discreet | Bulkier, more zoom |
Macro | Excellent close focus | No macro specifics |
Night/Astro | Higher ISO limit | Lower ISO, smoother video |
Video | Basic 1080p/30fps | 1080p/60fps, AVCHD |
Travel | Lightweight, rugged | Versatile zoom |
Professional Work | Rugged field tool | More manual control |
Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Choose the Olympus TG-2 iHS if you:
- Need a durable, rugged waterproof camera for adventure and travel.
- Value portability and weather-sealing.
- Shoot lots of close-up, macro, or underwater photos.
- Prefer simple operation with effective stabilization.
- Want GPS baked in for geo-tagging outdoor shots.
- Don’t mind lower resolution and limited manual control.
Choose the Sony HX100V if you:
- Require extended 30x zoom for wildlife, sports, or distant subjects.
- Want faster burst shooting and manual exposure modes.
- Prefer an electronic viewfinder and tilting screen.
- Shoot video and want smoother slow-motion footage.
- Are okay with a larger, heavier camera body.
- Desire a traditional SLR-style grip and control layout.
Getting the Most From Your Camera: Tips for New Owners
- Olympus TG-2 iHS: Explore underwater environments, practice macro focus techniques, and experiment with landscape HDR modes to enhance dynamic range. Invest in accessories like underwater housings and spares batteries.
- Sony HX100V: Leverage the zoom for distant subjects, learn manual exposures, and experiment with video modes. Supplemental tripods will improve telephoto stability.
Conclusion
Both the Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot HX100V offer unique benefits poised for different shooting styles and priorities. The Olympus excels in ruggedness, portability, and macro prowess, making it a front-runner for travelers and adventure seekers. The Sony’s expansive zoom, manual controls, and electronic viewfinder suit photographers prioritizing reach, creative control, and video smoothness.
By weighing your shooting preferences, environments, and handling needs, you’ll find that one of these cameras can serve as a reliable, inspiring tool for your creative journey. Whether you want to capture intimate nature close-ups or distant wildlife, or shoot vibrant street corners or miles of landscapes, your choice between Olympus and Sony depends on how much ruggedness, zoom reach, and manual control you need.
If you’re intrigued by these models, we recommend handling them in person to experience ergonomics and menus firsthand. Pair them with compatible accessories like extra batteries, memory cards, or tripods to unlock their full potential. Your next photo adventure awaits!
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX100V Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2011-10-21 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | OLED | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.70 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 577g (1.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $380 | $429 |