Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS15
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 136g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS15 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS15, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and FS15 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-4 was brought out 6 years after the FS15 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS15 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the TG-4 matches up versus the FS15 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS15 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Panasonic FS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic FS15
| TG-4 | FS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 76 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS15 over the Olympus TG-4
| FS15 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FS15
| TG-4 | FS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS15 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 features external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS15 has sizing of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS15 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-4 compared to the FS15.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and FS15 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS15 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and FS15.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to render extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FS15 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2009-01-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 136g (0.30 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $379 | $180 |
