Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus VG-145, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-3 was brought out 2 years later than the VG-145 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-3 matches up versus the VG-145 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Olympus VG-145. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus VG-145
| TG-3 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 33 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus TG-3
| VG-145 | TG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus VG-145
| TG-3 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 offers outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus VG-145 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-3 and the VG-145.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and VG-145 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and VG-145.
Clearly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-3 to render more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent TG-3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus VG-145 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2011-07-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 120g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photographs | 160 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $0 |