Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus VG-145, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-3 was brought out 2 years later than the VG-145 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-3 matches up versus the VG-145 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Olympus VG-145. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus VG-145
| TG-3 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 33 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus TG-3
| VG-145 | TG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus VG-145
| TG-3 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 offers outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus VG-145 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-3 and the VG-145.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and VG-145 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and VG-145.
Clearly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-3 to render more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent TG-3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus VG-145 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2011-07-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 120g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photographs | 160 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $0 |